Search

Background Cerebrovascular diseases are common comorbidities in patients with cancer. Although active cancer causes ischemic stroke by multiple pathological conditions, including thromboembolism attributable to Trousseau syndrome, the relationship between stroke and inactive cancer is poorly known. The aim of this study was to elucidate the different underlying pathogeneses of cryptogenic stroke in active and inactive patients with cancer, with detailed investigation by transesophageal echocardiography. Methods and Results CHALLENGE ESUS/CS (Mechanisms of Embolic Stroke Clarified by Transesophageal Echocardiography for Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source/Cryptogenic Stroke) registry is a multicenter registry including data of patients initially diagnosed as having cryptogenic stroke and undergoing transesophageal echocardiography. Patients were divided into active cancer, inactive cancer, and noncancer groups, and their clinical features were compared. Of the total 667 enrolled patients (age, 68.7±12.8 years; 455 men), 41 (6.1%) had active cancer, and 51 (7.5%) had a history of inactive cancer. On multinomial logistic regression analysis, infarctions in multiple vascular territories (odds ratio [OR], 2.73; 95% CI, 1.39–5.40) and CRP (C‐reactive protein) (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01–1.19) were independently associated with active cancer, whereas age (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01–1.08), contralateral carotid stenosis from the index stroke lesion (OR, 4.05; 95% CI, 1.60–10.27), calcification of the aortic valve (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.09–4.05), and complicated lesion of the aortic arch (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.11–4.10) were significantly associated with inactive cancer. Conclusions Patients with cancer were not rare in cryptogenic stroke. Although patients with active cancer had more multiple infarctions, patients with inactive cancer had more atherosclerotic embolic sources potentially causing arteriogenic strokes. Registration URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/; Unique identifier: UMIN000032957.

BackgroundEndovascular therapy has been shown to be effective in patients with acute cerebral large‐vessel occlusion, but real‐world efficacies are unknown. Methods and ResultsWe conducted a prospective registry at 46 centers between October 2014 and January 2017. Eligible patients were those who were aged 20 years or older, with acute cerebral large‐vessel occlusion, and who were hospitalized within 24 hours of the onset. We enrolled both consecutive patients who were treated with or without endovascular therapy. Endovascular therapy included thrombectomy, balloon angioplasty, stenting, local fibrinolysis, and piercing. The primary outcome was a favorable outcome as defined by a modified Rankin Scale of 0 to 2 at 90 days after onset. Secondary outcomes were modified Rankin Scale of 0 to 1 and mortality. Safety outcomes were intracerebral hemorrhage or a recurrence of ischemic stroke. We constructed the 2242 (1121 each) propensity score–matched patients cohort based on a propensity score for endovascular therapy and estimated the adjusted odds ratio, followed by sensitivity analyses on original 2399 (1278 in endovascular therapy versus 1121 in no endovascular therapy) patients. In the propensity score–matched cohort, favorable outcomes were observed in 35.3% and 30.7% of patients in the endovascular therapy and no endovascular therapy groups, respectively (P=0.02). The adjusted odds ratio for the favorable outcome was 1.44 (95% confidence interval, 1.10–1.86, P=0.007). The efficacy of endovascular therapy in achieving favorable outcomes did not differ between our subgroups and in the sensitivity analyses. ConclusionsEndovascular therapy decreased disabilities at 90 days in real‐world patients with acute cerebral large‐vessel occlusion. Clinical Trial RegistrationURL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02419794.