1. Association Between 2010 Medicare Reform and Inpatient Rehabilitation Access in People With Intracerebral Hemorrhage
- Author
-
Nneka L. Ifejika, Farhaan S. Vahidy, Mathew Reeves, Ying Xian, Li Liang, Roland Matsouaka, Gregg C. Fonarow, and James C. Grotta
- Subjects
healthcare policy ,inpatient rehabilitation facility ,intracerebral hemorrhage ,Medicare ,outcome ,rehabilitation ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
Background Evidence suggests intracerebral hemorrhage survivors have earlier recovery compared with ischemic stroke survivors. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services prospective payment system instituted documentation rules for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) in 2010, with the goal of optimizing patient selection. We investigated whether these requirements limited IRF and increased skilled nursing facility (SNF) use compared with home discharge. Methods and Results Intracerebral hemorrhage discharges to IRF, SNF, or home were estimated using GWTG (Get With The Guidelines) Stroke registry data between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2015 (n=265 444). Binary hierarchical models determined associations between the 2010 Rule and discharge setting; subgroup analyses evaluated age, geographic region, and hospital type. From January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2009, 45.5% of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage had home discharge, 22.2% went to SNF, and 32.3% went to IRF. After January 1, 2010, there was a 1.06% absolute increase in home discharge, a 0.46% increase in SNF, and a 1.52% decline in IRF. The adjusted odds of IRF versus home discharge decreased 3% after 2010 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95–1.00). Lower odds of IRF versus home discharge were observed in people aged
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF