Search

Background: Observational studies have consistently found a link between low serum 25‐hydroxyvitamin D concentration and higher risk of cognitive impairment. Results from randomized controlled trials have been mixed, and few have been conducted in the general population. Methods: We recruited 21,315 community‐dwelling Australians aged between 60 and 84 years to participate in the D‐Health Trial, a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. The intervention was monthly oral doses of 60,000 international units of vitamin D or placebo for 5 years. We assessed cognitive function in a randomly sampled group of participants aged ≥70 years using the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) at 2 and 5 years after randomization. The primary outcome for this analysis was TICS score; the secondary outcome was the proportion of people who had cognitive impairment (defined as TICS score ≤25). We analyzed data using mixed models (linear and logistic). Results: We interviewed 3887 participants at year 2 and 3614 participants at year 5. The mean TICS score at these time points was 32.3 and 32.2, respectively. Vitamin D supplementation did not affect cognitive function as measured by TICS score (mean difference between vitamin D and placebo groups 0.04; 95% CI −0.14 to 0.23), or alter risk of cognitive impairment (odds ratio 1.00; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.33). Conclusions: Monthly bolus doses of vitamin D supplementation neither enhanced nor hindered cognitive function among older adults. Population‐wide vitamin D supplementation of older adults that are largely vitamin D replete is unlikely to substantially benefit cognition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Retirement villages (RVs), also known as continuing care retirement communities, are an increasingly popular housing choice for older adults. The RV population has significant health needs, possibly representing a group with needs in between community‐dwelling older adults and those in long‐term residential care (LTC). Our previous work shows Gerontology Nurse Specialist (GNS)‐facilitated multidisciplinary team (MDT) interventions may reduce hospitalizations from LTC. This study tested whether a similar intervention reduced hospitalizations in RV residents. Methods: Open‐label randomized controlled trial in which 412 older residents of 33 RVs were randomized (1:1) to an MDT intervention or usual care. Setting: RVs across two District Health Boards in Auckland, New Zealand. Residents were eligible if considered high risk of health/functional decline (triggering ≥3 interRAI Clinical Assessment Protocols or needing special consideration identified by GNS). Intervention: GNS‐facilitated MDT intervention, including geriatrician/nurse practitioner and clinical pharmacist, versus usual care. Primary outcome was time from randomization to first acute hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were rate of acute hospitalizations, LTC admission, and mortality. Twelve residents died before randomization; all others (n = 400: MDT intervention = 199; usual care = 201) were included in intention‐to‐treat analyses. Results: Mean (SD) age was 82.2 (6.9) years, 302 (75.5%) were women, and 378 (94.5%) were European. Over median 1.5 years follow‐up, no difference was found in hazard of acute hospitalization between the MDT intervention (51.8%) and usual care (49.3%) groups (Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.77–1.34). No difference was found in the incidence rate of acute hospitalizations between the MDT intervention (0.69 per person‐year) and usual care (0.86 per person‐year) groups (incidence rate ratio = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.59–1.10). Similar results were seen for the proportion of residents with LTC transition (HR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.65–2.11) and mortality (HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.36–1.35). Conclusion: Further studies are needed to assess the effects of other patient‐centered interventions and outcomes with adequate primary care integration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To test a new cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia ( CBT-I) program designed for use by nonclinicians. Design Randomized controlled trial. Setting Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare system. Participants Community-dwelling veterans aged 60 and older who met diagnostic criteria for insomnia of 3 months duration or longer (N = 159). Intervention Nonclinician 'sleep coaches' delivered a five-session manual-based CBT-I program including stimulus control, sleep restriction, sleep hygiene, and cognitive therapy (individually or in small groups), with weekly telephone behavioral sleep medicine supervision. Controls received five sessions of general sleep education. Measurements Primary outcomes, including self-reported (7-day sleep diary) sleep onset latency ( SOL-D), wake after sleep onset ( WASO-D), total wake time ( TWT-D), and sleep efficiency ( SE-D); Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index ( PSQI); and objective sleep efficiency (7-day wrist actigraphy, SE-A) were measured at baseline, at the posttreatment assessment, and at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Additional measures included the Insomnia Severity Index ( ISI), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 ( PHQ-9)), and quality of life (Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short-form Survey version 2 ( SF-12v2)). Results Intervention subjects had greater improvement than controls between the baseline and posttreatment assessments, the baseline and 6-month assessments, and the baseline and 12-month assessments in SOL-D (−23.4, −15.8, and −17.3 minutes, respectively), TWT-D (−68.4, −37.0, and −30.9 minutes, respectively), SE-D (10.5%, 6.7%, and 5.4%, respectively), PSQI (−3.4, −2.4, and −2.1 in total score, respectively), and ISI (−4.5, −3.9, and −2.8 in total score, respectively) (all P < .05). There were no significant differences in SE-A, PHQ-9, or SF-12v2. Conclusion Manual-based CBT-I delivered by nonclinician sleep coaches improves sleep in older adults with chronic insomnia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To determine the effectiveness of a proactive primary care program on the daily functioning of older people in primary care. Design Single-blind, three-arm, cluster-randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Setting Primary care setting, 39 general practices in the Netherlands. Participants Community-dwelling people aged 60 and older (N = 3,092). Interventions A frailty screening intervention using routine electronic medical record data to identify older people at risk of adverse events followed by usual care from a general practitioner; after the screening intervention, a nurse-led care program consisting of a comprehensive geriatric assessment, evidence-based care planning, care coordination, and follow-up; usual care. Measurements Primary outcome was daily functioning measured using the Katz-15 (6 activities of daily living ( ADLs), 8 instrumental activities of daily living ( IADLs), one mobility item (range 0-15)); higher scores indicate greater dependence. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, primary care consultations, hospital admissions, emergency department visits, nursing home admissions, and mortality. Results The participants in both intervention arms had less decline in daily functioning than those in the usual care arm at 12 months (mean Katz-15 score: screening arm, 1.87, 95% confidence interval ( CI) = 1.77-1.97; screening and nurse-led care arm, 1.88, 95% CI = 1.80-1.96; control group, 2.03, 95% CI = 1.92-2.13; P = .03). No differences in quality of life were observed. Conclusion Participants in both intervention groups had less decline than those in the control group at 1-year follow-up. Despite the statistically significant effect, the clinical relevance is uncertain at this point because of the small differences. Greater customizing of the intervention combined with prolonged follow-up may lead to more-robust results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]