Search

Background: To evaluate how a national policy of testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) regardless of symptoms was implemented during outbreaks in Dutch nursing homes in the second wave of the pandemic and to explore barriers and facilitators to serial testing. Methods: We conducted a mixed‐method study of nursing homes in the Netherlands with a SARS‐CoV‐2 outbreak after 15 September 2020. Direct care staff and management from 355 healthcare organizations were invited to participate in a digital survey. A total of 74 out of 355 (20.9%) healthcare organizations participated and provided information about 117 nursing homes. We conducted 26 in‐depth interviews on the outbreak and the testing strategy used. We also conducted four focus group meetings involving managers, physicians, nurses, and certified health assistants. Recordings were transcribed and data were thematically analyzed. Results: One hundred and four nursing homes (89%) tested residents regardless of their symptoms during the outbreak, and 85 nursing homes (73%) tested the staff regardless of their symptoms. However, interviews showed testing was sometimes implemented during later stages of the outbreak and was not always followed up with serial testing. Barriers to serial testing regardless of symptoms were lack of knowledge of local leaders with decisional making authority, lack of a cohort ward or skilled staff, and insufficient collaboration with laboratories or local public health services. Important facilitators to serial testing were staff willingness to undergo testing and the availability of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests. Conclusions: Serial testing regardless of symptoms was only partially implemented. The response rate of 21% of nursing home organizations gives a risk of selection bias. Barriers to testing need to be addressed. A national implementation policy that promotes collaboration between public health services and nursing homes and educates management and care staff is necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To explore changes in care goals and treatment orders around the occurrence of pneumonia and intake problems, and whether hospitalization is in line with earlier agreed-upon do-not-hospitalize orders. Design Data were collected as part of the Dutch End of Life in Dementia study (2007-2011), a longitudinal observational study with up to 3.5 years of follow-up. Setting Long-term care facilities (N = 28) in the Netherlands. Participants Newly admitted nursing home patients (N = 372) in various stages of dementia. Measurements Semiannually, physicians completed questionnaires about care goals and treatment orders, and they continuously registered episodes of pneumonia, intake problems and hospitalization. We report on changes in care goals and treatment orders during follow-up in relation to the developing of pneumonia and intake problems and on hospitalization and reasons for hospitalization. Results The proportion of patients with palliative care goals and do-not-treat orders rose during follow-up, especially before death. Treatment orders most frequently referred to resuscitation and hospitalization (do-not order increased from 73% to 92%, and from 28% to 76%, respectively). The proportions of patients with a palliative care goal and do-not-treat orders were similar after developing pneumonia, but increased after intake problems. During follow-up, 46 patients were hospitalized one or more times. Hospitalization occurred despite a do-not-hospitalize order in 21% of decisions. The most frequently reported reason for hospitalization was a fracture, especially in patients with a do-not-hospitalize order. Conclusion Care plans, including global care goals (predominantly palliative care goals), are made soon after admission, and specific treatment orders are agreed upon in more detail when the condition of the patient worsens. Establishing care plans shortly after nursing home admission may help to prevent burdensome treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]