Search

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare color alterations (ΔE) of white-spot lesions (WSLs) bleached before versus after resin infiltration (RI)., Methods: Using the facial surfaces of bovine maxillary incisors, WSLs were created and the teeth were allocated into 2 groups (n = 45/group): bleach then RI (B-RI group) and RI then bleach (RI-B group). To determine ΔE, Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage L∗ a∗ b∗ (L∗ represents lightness, ranging from black to white [0-100]; a∗ represents green to red chromaticity [-150-+100]; and b∗ represents blue to yellow chromaticity [-100-+150]) measurements were obtained at baseline, after WSL formation, and after RI and bleaching. Representative specimens were evaluated by means of scanning electron microscopy. Statistical analyses included the Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon signed rank tests (P ≤ .0016) and repeated measures analysis of variance (P ≤ .05)., Results: No differences in ΔE were found comparing B-RI with RI-B groups or when the B-RI group was compared with bleached enamel. A statistically significant difference was found when the RI-B group was compared with bleached enamel (ΔE, 0.81; P < .001), but the difference was deemed not clinically significant. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that bleaching after RI increased surface roughness of the resin., Conclusions: There were no clinically significant differences in ΔE of WSLs when bleach was applied before or after RI; however, applying bleaching agent after RI roughened the surface of the resin material., Practical Implications: Results indicate that ΔE were not clinically significantly different between WSLs bleached before versus after RI, although it is best to sequence bleaching before RI therapy, as bleaching after RI roughened the restoration's surface., (Copyright © 2022 American Dental Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The authors conducted a randomized, single-masked clinical trial involving patients who had completed orthodontic treatment to assess changes in the appearance of white-spot lesions (WSLs) that were treated with resin infiltration., Methods: The authors divided affected teeth into control and treatment groups. In the treatment group, they restored teeth with WSLs by using resin infiltration. They evaluated changes in WSLs photographically by using a visual analog scale (VAS) (0 = no change, 100 = complete disappearance) and area measurements (in square millimeters). The authors analyzed the data by using two-way analysis of variance., Results: The mean VAS ratings for treated teeth demonstrated marked improvement relative to that for control teeth immediately after treatment (67.7 versus 5.2, P < .001) and eight weeks later (65.9 versus 9.2, P < .001). The results for treated teeth showed a mean reduction in WSL area of 61.8 percent immediately after treatment and 60.9 percent eight weeks later, compared with a -3.3 percent change for control teeth immediately after treatment and a 1.0 percent reduction eight weeks later., Conclusions: Resin infiltration significantly improved the clinical appearance of WSLs, with stable results seen eight weeks after treatment., Practical Implications: Resin infiltration, a minimally invasive restorative treatment, was shown to be effective for WSLs that formed during orthodontic treatment.