Search

Background: Frailty is an emerging risk factor for surgical outcomes; however, its application across large populations is not well defined. We hypothesized that frailty affects postoperative outcomes in a large health care system., Study Design: Frailty was prospectively measured in elective surgery patients (January 2016 to June 2017) in a health care system (4 hospitals/901 beds). Frailty classifications-low (0), intermediate (1 to 2), high (3 to 5)-were assigned based on the modified Hopkins score. Operations were classified as inpatient (IP) vs outpatient (OP). Outcomes measured (30-day) included major morbidity, discharge location, emergency department (ED) visit, readmission, length of stay (LOS), mortality, and direct-cost/patient., Results: There were 14,530 elective surgery patients (68.1% outpatient, 31.9% inpatient) preoperatively assessed (cardiothoracic 4%, colorectal 4%, general 29%, oral maxillofacial 2%, otolaryngology 8%, plastic surgery 13%, podiatry 6%, surgical oncology 5%, transplant 3%, urology 24%, vascular 2%). High frailty was found in 3.4% of patients (5.3% IP, 2.5% OP). Incidence of major morbidity, readmission, and mortality correlated with frailty classification in all patients (p < 0.05). In the IP cohort, length of stay in days (low 1.6, intermediate 2.3, high 4.1, p < 0.0001) and discharge to facility increased with frailty (p < 0.05). In the OP cohort, ED visits increased with frailty (p < 0.05). Frailty was associated with increased direct-cost in the IP cohort (low, $7,045; intermediate, $7,995; high, $8,599; p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Frailty affects morbidity, mortality, and health care resource use in both IP and OP operations. Additionally, IP cost increased with frailty. The broad applicability of frailty (across surgical specialties) represents an opportunity for risk stratification and patient optimization across a large health care system., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: General surgery training has historically lacked a standardized approach to resident quality improvement (QI) education aside from traditional morbidity and mortality conference. In 2013, the ACGME formalized QI as a component of residency training. Our residency chose the NSQIP Quality In-Training Initiative (QITI) as the foundation for our QI training. We hypothesized that a focused curriculum based on outcomes would produce change in culture and improve the quality of patient care., Study Design: Quality improvement curriculum design and implementation were retrospectively reviewed. Institutional NSQIP data pre-, during, and post-curriculum implementation were reviewed for improvement., Results: A QITI project committee designed a 2-year curriculum, with 3 parts: didactics, focused on methods of data collection, QI processes, and techniques; review of current institutional performance, practice, and complication rates; and QI breakout groups tasked with creating "best practice" guidelines addressing common complications in our NSQIP semi-annual reports. Educational presentations were given to the surgical department addressing reduction of cardiac complications, pneumonia, surgical site infections (SSIs), and urinary tract infections (UTIs). Twenty-four residents completed both years of the QITI curriculum. National NSQIP decile ranks improved in known high outlier areas: cardiac complications, ninth to fourth decile; pneumonia, eighth to first decile; SSIs, tenth to second decile; and UTIs, eighth to third decile. Pneumonia and SSI rates demonstrated statistical improvement after curriculum implementation (p < 0.003)., Conclusions: Implementing a QITI curriculum with a full resident complement is feasible and can positively affect surgical morbidity and nationally benchmarked performance. Resident QI education is essential to future success in delivering high quality surgical care., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: To identify patients with a high risk of 30-day mortality after elective surgery, who may benefit from referral for tertiary care, an institution-specific process using the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) Risk Calculator was developed. The goal was to develop and validate the methodology. Our hypothesis was that the process could optimize referrals and reduce mortality., Study Design: A VASQIP risk score was calculated for all patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery at a single Veterans Affairs (VA) facility. After statistical analysis, a VASQIP risk score of 3.3% predicted mortality was selected as the institutional threshold for referral to a tertiary care center. The model predicted that 16% of patients would require referral, and 30-day mortality would be reduced by 73% at the referring institution. The main outcomes measures were the actual vs predicted referrals and mortality rates at the referring and receiving facilities., Results: The validation included 565 patients; 90 (16%) had VASQIP risk scores greater than 3.3% and were identified for referral; 60 consented. In these patients, there were 16 (27%) predicted mortalities, but only 4 actual deaths (p = 0.007) at the receiving institution. When referral was not indicated, the model predicted 4 mortalities (1%), but no actual deaths (p = 0.1241)., Conclusions: These data validate this methodology to identify patients for referral to a higher level of care, reducing mortality at the referring institutions and significantly improving patient outcomes. This methodology can help guide decisions on referrals and optimize patient care. Further application and studies are warranted., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Surgeons. All rights reserved.)

Background: Case mix index (CMI) is calculated to determine the relative value assigned to a Diagnosis-Related Group. Accurate documentation of patient complications and comorbidities and major complications and comorbidities changes CMI and can affect hospital reimbursement and future pay for performance metrics., Study Design: Starting in 2010, a physician panel concurrently reviewed the documentation of the trauma/acute care surgeons. Clarifications of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services term-specific documentation were made by the panel, and the surgeon could incorporate or decline the clinical queries. A retrospective review of trauma/acute care inpatients was performed. The mean severity of illness, risk of mortality, and CMI from 2009 were compared with the 3 subsequent years. Mean length of stay and mean Injury Severity Score by year were listed as measures of patient acuity. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and t-test, with p < 0.05 for significance., Results: Each year demonstrated an increase in severity of illness, risk of mortality, and CMI compared with baseline values (p < 0.05). Length of stay was not significantly different, reflecting similar patient populations throughout the study. Injury Severity Score decreased in 2011 and 2012 compared with 2009, reflecting a lower level of injury in the trauma population., Conclusions: A concurrent documentation review significantly increases severity of illness, risk of mortality, and CMI scores in a trauma/acute care service compared with pre-program levels. These changes reflect more accurate key word documentation rather than a change in patient acuity. The increased scores might impact hospital reimbursement and more accurately stratify outcomes measures for care providers., (Copyright © 2015 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) has been introduced as an effective tool for reducing perioperative mortality and complications. Although reported completion rates are high, objective compliance is not well defined. The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to determine SSC compliance as measured by accuracy and completion, and factors that can affect compliance., Study Design: In September 2010, our institution implemented an adaptation of the World Health Organization's SSC in an effort to improve patient safety and outcomes. A tool was developed for objective evaluation of overall compliance (maximum score 40) that was an aggregate score of completion and accuracy (20 each). Random samples of SSCs were analyzed at specific, predefined, time points throughout the first year after implementation. Procedure start time, operative time, and case complexity were assessed to determine association with compliance., Results: A total of 671 SSCs were analyzed. The participation rate improved from 33% (95 of 285) at week 1 to 94% (249 of 265) at 1 year (p < 0.0001, chi-square test). Mean overall compliance score was 27.7 (± 5.4 SD) of 40 possible points (69.3% ± 13.5% of total possible score; n = 671) and did not change over time. Although completion scores were high (16.9 ± 2.7 out of 20 [84.5% ± 13.6%]), accuracy was poor (10.8 ± 3.4 out of 20 [54.1% ± 16.9%]). Overall compliance score was significantly associated with case start-time (p < 0.05), and operative time and case complexity showed no association., Conclusions: Our data indicate that although implementation of an SSC results in a high level of overall participation and completion, accuracy remained poor. Identification of barriers to effective use is needed, as improper checklist use can adversely affect patient safety., (Copyright © 2013 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Full thickness rectal prolapse (FTRP) is managed with an abdominal or perineal operation. Traditionally, the approach has been determined by patient age and comorbidities. Our aim was to determine operative trends and outcomes for repair of FTRP in elderly patients using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database., Study Design: We queried the ACS NSQIP database from 2006 to 2009 for patients with FTRP who were 70 years of age or older. Patients were grouped according to type of surgical repair: laparoscopic (LR), open (OR), or perineal (PR) technique. We reviewed demographics, operative trends of surgical technique, and short-term outcomes for each group., Results: A total of 816 patients were analyzed; 596 (73%) PR, 130 (16%) OR, and 90 (11%) LR patients. Patients who received OR and LR had lower mean American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores than PR patients (2.6, 2.5, and 2.7, respectively, p < 0.001). The percentage of LR and OR procedures decreased as age increased by decade; the inverse was seen for PR (p < 0.001). The distribution of operative techniques has not changed from year to year. Length of stay was significantly shorter for LR (3.77 days) and PR (3.44 days) patients vs OR patients (6.23 days) (p = 0.01). Complication rates were 2.22%, 8.72%, and 12.31% for LR, PR, and OR, respectively (p = 0.021). Open surgery was the only factor associated with an increased complication rate, with an odds ratio of 6.29 (95% CI 1.38 to 28.6, p < 0.02)., Conclusions: Despite the appeal of perineal proctectomy in the elderly and debilitated patient, the approach to FTRP is slowly evolving in the era of laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic repair of FTRP in the elderly is associated with improved short-term outcomes when compared with OR and PR., (Copyright © 2012 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Single-incision laparoscopic (SIL) colectomy is an advance in minimally invasive colorectal surgical techniques. Feasibility and safety of SIL colectomy has been reported; however, benefits and outcomes are not well-defined. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of SIL right colectomy with multiport laparoscopic (LAP) and hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL) techniques., Methods: SIL right colectomy cases performed between August 2009 and April 2010 were case-matched for age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, previous abdominal surgery, and pathology to an equivalent number of LAP and HAL right colectomy cases. Data analyzed included operative time, procedure conversion, incision length, length of hospital stay, 30-day hospital readmission, surgical site infection and maximum postoperative pain score., Results: Twenty-nine patients were analyzed in each of 3 groups (SIL, LAP, and HAL). The mean age (p = 0.96), body mass index (p = 0.48), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (p = 0.74), and rate of previous abdominal operation (p = 0.95) were similar, and sex and pathology were identical among groups. Operative time and conversion rates were similar. The incision length for SIL (4.5 cm) and LAP (5.1 cm) groups was similar, and both were significantly shorter than HAL group (7.2 cm; p < 0.001). Length of hospital stay was 3.4 days for the SIL group and was more than 1-day shorter than LAP and HAL groups (p < 0.05). Postoperative surgical site infection and hospital readmission were similar among groups. Maximum pain score on postoperative days 1 and 2 was significantly lower in SIL group (p < 0.05)., Conclusions: SIL right colectomy can improve patient recovery through a decrease in early postoperative pain and shorter length of hospital stay when compared with established laparoscopic techniques., (Copyright © 2011 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Surgical dogma states that "if you think about doing a fasciotomy, you do it," yet the benefit of this approach remains unclear. We hypothesized that early fasciotomy during index operative procedures for extremity vascular trauma would be associated with improved patient outcomes., Study Design: This prospective, observational multicenter (17 level 1, 1 level 2) analysis included patients ≥15 years old with extremity vascular injury requiring operative management. Clinical variables were analyzed with respect to fasciotomy timing for correlation with outcomes, including muscle necrosis and limb amputation. Associated variables (p < 0.05) were input into multivariable logistic regression models evaluating these endpoints., Results: Of 436 study patients, most were male (87%) with penetrating (57%), lower extremity (77%), arterial (73%), vein (40%), and bony (53%) injury with prolonged hospital length of stay (11 days). Patients who had index fasciotomy (66%) were compared with those who did not (34%), and no differences were appreciated with respect to age, initial systolic blood pressure, tourniquet time, "hard" signs of vascular injury, massive transfusion protocol activation, or Injury Severity Score (all p < 0.05). Of the 289 patients who underwent index fasciotomy, 49% had prophylactic fasciotomy, 11% developed muscle necrosis, 4% required an additional fasciotomy, and 8% required amputation, although only 28 of 147 (19%) required delayed fasciotomy in those without index fasciotomy. Importantly, forgoing index fasciotomy did not correlate (p > 0.05) with additional muscle necrosis or amputation risk in the delayed fasciotomy group. After controlling for confounders, index surgery fasciotomy was not associated with either muscle necrosis or limb salvage in multivariable models., Conclusions: Routine, index operation fasciotomy failed to demonstrate an outcome benefit in this prospective, multicenter analysis. Our data suggest that a careful observation and fasciotomy-when-needed approach may limit unnecessary surgery and its resulting morbidity in extremity vascular trauma patients., (Copyright © 2023 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)