Search

Objectives: This subanalysis of the TNT (Treating to New Targets) study investigates the effects of intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) with and without pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD). Background: Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with CKD. Methods: A total of 10,001 patients with CHD were randomized to double-blind therapy with atorvastatin 80 mg/day or 10 mg/day. Patients with CKD were identified at baseline on the basis of an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. The primary efficacy outcome was time to first major cardiovascular event. Results: Of 9,656 patients with complete renal data, 3,107 had CKD at baseline and demonstrated greater cardiovascular comorbidity than those with normal eGFR (n = 6,549). After a median follow-up of 5.0 years, 351 patients with CKD (11.3%) experienced a major cardiovascular event, compared with 561 patients with normal eGFR (8.6%) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18 to 1.54; p < 0.0001). Compared with atorvastatin 10 mg, atorvastatin 80 mg reduced the relative risk of major cardiovascular events by 32% in patients with CKD (HR = 0.68; 95% CI 0.55 to 0.84; p = 0.0003) and 15% in patients with normal eGFR (HR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.00; p = 0.049). Both doses of atorvastatin were well tolerated in patients with CKD. Conclusions: Aggressive lipid lowering with atorvastatin 80 mg was both safe and effective in reducing the excess of cardiovascular events in a high-risk population with CKD and CHD. (Treating to New Targets Study; NCT00327691) [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Epidemiologic studies have shown that the concentration of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is a strong, independent, inverse predictor of coronary heart disease risk. This identifies HDL-C as a potential therapeutic target. Compared with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering agents, however, currently available HDL-raising drugs are relatively ineffective. Consequently, recent years have seen considerable efforts expended on identifying new drugs that can raise HDL-C. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) plays an important role in cholesterol metabolism, being responsible for the transfer of cholesteryl esters from HDL to very low-density lipoproteins and LDLs. The observation that Japanese populations with CETP deficiency exhibited high levels of HDL-C has led to the concept that drugs targeting CETP activity may elevate HDL-C levels and potentially decrease cardiovascular risk. Support of this proposition has been obtained in rabbits where inhibition of CETP activity is markedly antiatherogenic. Two CETP inhibitors—torcetrapib and JTT-705—are currently in the preliminary stages of clinical development. Initial studies with these drugs in humans show that they substantially increase HDL-C levels and modestly decrease LDL-C levels. Larger, long-term, randomized, clinical end point trials are required to determine whether the beneficial effects of CETP inhibitors on lipoprotein metabolism can translate into reductions in cardiovascular events. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Adding to the foundation of statins, ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i), novel, emerging low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering therapies are under development for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Inclisiran, a small interfering RNA molecule that inhibits PCSK9, only needs to be dosed twice a year and has the potential to help overcome current barriers to persistence and adherence to lipid-lowering therapies. Bempedoic acid, which lowers LDL-C upstream from statins, provides a novel alternative for patients with statin intolerance. Angiopoetin-like 3 protein (ANGPTL3) inhibitors have been shown to provide potent LDL-C lowering in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia without major adverse effects as seen with lomitapide and mipomersen, and may reduce the need for apheresis. Finally, CETP inhibitors may yet be effective with the development of obicetrapib. These novel agents provide the clinician the tools to effectively lower LDL-C across the entire range of LDL-C-induced elevation of cardiovascular risk, from primary prevention and secondary prevention to null-null homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of this research was to estimate the efficacy and safety of current high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)-increasing drugs. Background: Epidemiologic evidence has shown that HDL-C is inversely related to coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. However, the evidence for reducing CHD risk by raising HDL-C is thin, predominantly due to the paucity of effective and safe HDL-increasing drugs. Methods: Randomized controlled trials with fibrates and niacin, published between 1966 through February 2004 (MEDLINE), were retrieved. Information on treatment, baseline characteristics, serum lipids, end points, and side-effects were independently abstracted by two authors using a standardized protocol. Results: Data from 53 trials (16,802 subjects) using fibrates and 30 trials (4,749 subjects) using niacin were included. Random-effects model showed 11% versus 10% reduction in total cholesterol, 36% versus 20% reduction in triglycerides, 8% versus 14% reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and 10% versus 16% increase in HDL-C for fibrates and niacin, respectively. Apart from flushes in the niacin group, both fibrates and niacin were shown to be well-tolerated and safe. Fibrates reduced the risk for major coronary events by 25% (95% confidence interval 10% to 38%), whereas current available data for niacin indicate a 27% reduction. Conclusions: Fibrates reduce major coronary events and increase HDL-C levels without significant toxicity. Niacin has a more potent effect on HDL-C levels, whereas data on cardiovascular event rate reduction are limited. Future studies need to evaluate whether additional HDL increase by fibrates or particularly newer niacin formulations on top of statin therapy translates into further event reduction in high-risk subjects, without significant toxicity. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Inclisiran is a double-stranded small interfering RNA that suppresses proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) translation in the liver, leading to sustained reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and other atherogenic lipoproteins with twice-yearly dosing.Objectives: The purpose of this study was to conduct a patient-level pooled analysis from 3 phase 3 studies of inclisiran.Methods: Participants with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (ORION-9 [Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Inclisiran Treatment on Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) in Subjects With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HeFH)]), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (ORION-10 [Inclisiran for Participants With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Elevated Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol]), or ASCVD and ASCVD risk equivalents (ORION-11 [Inclisiran for Subjects With ASCVD or ASCVD-Risk Equivalents and Elevated Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol]) taking maximally tolerated statin therapy, with or without other LDL-C-lowering agents, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either inclisiran or placebo, administered by subcutaneous injection on day 1, day 90, and every 6 months thereafter for 540 days. The coprimary endpoints were the placebo-corrected percentage change in LDL-C level from baseline to day 510 and the time-adjusted percentage change in LDL-C level from baseline after day 90 to day 540. Levels of other atherogenic lipoproteins and treatment-emergent adverse events were also assessed.Results: A total of 3,660 participants (n = 482, n = 1,561, and n = 1,617 from ORION-9, -10, and -11, respectively) underwent randomization. The placebo-corrected change in LDL-C with inclisiran at day 510 was -50.7% (95% confidence interval: -52.9% to -48.4%; p < 0.0001). The corresponding time-adjusted change in LDL-C was -50.5% (95% confidence interval: -52.1% to -48.9%; p < 0.0001). Safety was similar in both groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events at the injection site were more frequent with inclisiran than placebo (5.0% vs. 0.7%), but were predominantly mild, and none were severe or persistent. Liver and kidney function tests, creatine kinase values, and platelet counts did not differ between groups.Conclusions: These pooled safety and efficacy data show that inclisiran, given twice yearly in addition to maximally tolerated statin therapy with or without other LDL-C lowering agents, is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment to lower LDL-C in adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, ASCVD, or ASCVD risk equivalents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Incremental low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol lowering with the proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 inhibitor evolocumab regresses coronary atherosclerosis in statin-treated patients.Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding evolocumab to statin therapy on coronary plaque composition.Methods: A total of 968 statin-treated coronary artery disease patients underwent serial coronary intravascular ultrasound imaging at baseline and following 76 weeks of treatment with placebo or evolocumab 420 mg monthly. Plaque composition changes were determined in 331 patients with evaluable radiofrequency analysis of the ultrasound backscatter signal.Results: Compared with statin monotherapy, evolocumab further reduced LDL cholesterol (33.5 mg/dl vs. 89.9 mg/dl; p < 0.0001) and induced regression of percent atheroma volume (-1.2% vs. +0.17%; p < 0.0001) and total atheroma volume (-3.6 mm3 vs. -0.8 mm3; p = 0.04). No difference was observed between the evolocumab and placebo groups in changes in calcium (1.0 ± 0.3 mm3 vs. 0.6 ± 0.3 mm3; p = 0.49), fibrous (-3.0 ± 0.6 mm3 vs. -2.4 ± 0.6 mm3; p = 0.49), fibrofatty (-5.0 ± 1.0 mm3 vs. -3.0 ± 1.0 mm3; p = 0.49), and necrotic (-0.6 ± 0.5 mm3 vs. -0.1 ± 0.5 mm3; p = 0.49) volumes. An inverse correlation was observed between changes in LDL cholesterol and plaque calcification (r = -0.15; p < 0.001).Conclusions: The addition of evolocumab to a statin did not produce differential changes in plaque composition compared with statin monotherapy. This suggests that evaluation of plaque morphology using virtual histology imaging may provide no incremental information about the plaque effects of evolocumab beyond measurement of plaque burden. (GLobal Assessment of Plaque reGression With a PCSK9 antibOdy as Measured by intraVascular Ultrasound [GLAGOV]; NCT01813422). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH), a rare genetic disorder, is characterized by extremely elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and accelerated atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Statin treatment starts at diagnosis, but no statin has been formally evaluated in, or approved for, HoFH children.Objectives: The authors sought to assess the LDL-C efficacy of rosuvastatin versus placebo in HoFH children, and the relationship with underlying genetic mutations.Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, 12-week, crossover study of rosuvastatin 20 mg versus placebo, followed by 12 weeks of open-label rosuvastatin. Patients discontinued all lipid-lowering treatment except ezetimibe and/or apheresis. Clinical and laboratory assessments were performed every 6 weeks. The relationship between LDL-C response and genetic mutations was assessed by adding children and adults from a prior HoFH rosuvastatin trial.Results: Twenty patients were screened, 14 randomized, and 13 completed the study. The mean age was 10.9 years; 8 patients were on ezetimibe and 7 on apheresis. Mean LDL-C was 481 mg/dl (range: 229 to 742 mg/dl) on placebo and 396 mg/dl (range: 130 to 700 mg/dl) on rosuvastatin, producing a mean 85.4 mg/dl (22.3%) difference (p = 0.005). Efficacy was similar regardless of age or use of ezetimibe or apheresis, and was maintained for 12 weeks. Adverse events were few and not serious. Patients with 2 defective versus 2 negative LDL receptor mutations had mean LDL-C reductions of 23.5% (p = 0.0044) and 14% (p = 0.038), respectively.Conclusions: This first-ever pediatric HoFH statin trial demonstrated safe and effective LDL-C reduction with rosuvastatin 20 mg alone or added to ezetimibe and/or apheresis. The LDL-C response in children and adults was related to underlying genetic mutations. (A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rosuvastatin in Children and Adolescents With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia [HYDRA]; NCT02226198). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibodies can reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to very low levels when added to background lipid-lowering therapy.Objectives: The safety of alirocumab was evaluated in patients with at least 2 consecutive LDL-C values <25 or <15 mg/dl in the ODYSSEY program, with follow-up as long as 104 weeks.Methods: Pooled data from 14 trials were analyzed (double-blind treatment 8 to 104 weeks; n = 3,340 alirocumab, n = 1,894 control [placebo or ezetimibe]; representing 4,029 [alirocumab] and 2,114 [control] double-blind patient-years' exposure).Results: In alirocumab-treated patients, 839 (25.1%) achieved 2 consecutive LDL-C values <25 mg/dl, and 314 (9.4%) achieved <15 mg/dl. Baseline LDL-C was lower (mean 100.3 vs. 134.3 mg/dl) in patients with LDL-C <25 versus ≥25 mg/dl. Similar rates of adverse events occurred in patients achieving LDL-C <25 and <15 mg/dl (72.7% and 71.7%, respectively), compared with 76.6% in those who did not achieve LDL-C <25 mg/dl. Neurological and neurocognitive events were similar among the 3 groups. In a propensity score analysis, the rate of cataracts was higher in patients with LDL-C <25 mg/dl (2.6%) versus ≥25 mg/dl (0.8%; hazard ratio: 3.40; 95% confidence interval: 1.58 to 7.35). However, no difference in cataract incidence was observed between pooled alirocumab and control groups.Conclusions: LDL-C levels <25 or <15 mg/dl on alirocumab were not associated with an increase in overall treatment-emergent adverse event rates or neurocognitive events, although cataract incidence appeared to be increased in the group achieving LDL-C levels <25 mg/dl. (Pooled analyses of already reported trials; NCT01288443, NCT01288469, NCT01266876, NCT01812707, NCT01507831, NCT01617655, NCT01623115, NCT01709500, NCT01644175, NCT01644188, NCT01730040, NCT01730053, NCT01644474, and NCT01709513). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Costs and uncertainty about the benefits of nonstatin therapies limit their use.Objectives: The authors sought to identify patients who might benefit from the addition of a nonstatin to background statin therapy.Methods: We performed systematic reviews of subgroup analyses from randomized trials and observational studies with statin-treated participants to determine estimated 10-year absolute risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and to define high-risk and very high-risk patients. We used the relative risk reductions for the addition of a nonstatin to lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) used to determine the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent 1 ASCVD event over 5 years for each patient group and to allow comparisons with 5-year cost analyses.Results: The 10-year ASCVD risk is at least 30% (very high risk) for statin-treated participants with clinical ASCVD and comorbidities, and 20% to 29% (high risk) for those with ASCVD without comorbidities or who have heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Adding ezetimibe to reduce low-density LDL-C by 20% would provide a 5-year NNT ≤50 for very high-risk patients with LDL-C ≥130 mg/dl or for high-risk patients with LDL-C ≥190 mg/dl, and an NNT ≤30 for very high-risk patients with LDL-C ≥160 mg/dl. Adding a PCSK9 monoclonal antibody to lower LDL-C by at least 50% would provide an NNT ≤50 for very high-risk and high-risk patients with LDL-C ≥70 mg/dl, and an NNT ≤30 for very high-risk and high-risk patients with an LDL-C ≥130 mg/dl.Conclusions: Adding ezetimibe or PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies to maximally tolerated statin therapy may be cost effective in very high-risk and high-risk patients, depending on baseline LDL-C levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A statin-induced reduction of coronary artery disease (CAD) events and mortality has not been adequately quantified in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH).Objectives: This study estimated the relative risk reduction for CAD and mortality by statins in heterozygous FH patients.Methods: The authors included all adult heterozygous FH patients, identified by the Dutch screening program for FH between 1994 and 2013, who were free of CAD at baseline. Hospital, pharmacy, and mortality records between 1995 and 2015 were linked to these patients. The primary outcome was the composite of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, and death from any cause. The effect of statins (time-varying) was determined using a Cox proportional hazard model, while correcting for the use of other lipid-lowering therapy, thrombocyte aggregation inhibitors, and antihypertensive and antidiabetic medication. The authors applied inverse-probability-for-treatment weighting (IPTW) to account for differences at baseline between statin users and never-users.Results: The authors obtained medical records of 2,447 patients, of whom 888 were excluded on the basis of age <18 years or previous CAD. Simvastatin 40 mg and atorvastatin 40 mg accounted for 23.1% and 22.8% of all prescriptions, respectively. Statin users (n = 1,041) experienced 89 CAD events and 17 deaths during 11,674 person-years of follow-up versus statin never-users (n = 518), who had 22 CAD events and 9 deaths during 4,892 person-years (combined rates 8.8 vs. 5.3 per 1,000 person-years, respectively; p < 0.001). After applying IPTW and adjusting for other medications, the hazard ratio of statin use for CAD and all-cause mortality was 0.56 (95% confidence interval: 0.33 to 0.96).Conclusions: In patients with heterozygous FH, moderate- to high-intensity statin therapy lowered the risk for CAD and mortality by 44%. This is essential information in all cost-effectiveness studies of this disorder, such as when evaluating reimbursement of new lipid-lowering therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are characterized by elevated atherogenic lipoprotein particles, predominantly low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), which is associated with accelerated atherogenesis and increased cardiovascular risk. Objectives This study used 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ( 18 FDG-PET) to investigate whether arterial inflammation is higher in patients with FH and, moreover, whether lipoprotein apheresis attenuates arterial wall inflammation in FH patients. Methods In total, 38 subjects were recruited: 24 FH patients and 14 normolipidemic controls. All subjects underwent FDG-PET imaging at baseline. Twelve FH patients who met the criteria for lipoprotein apheresis underwent apheresis procedures followed by a second FDG-PET imaging 3 days (range 1 to 4 days) after apheresis. Subsequently, the target-to-background ratio (TBR) of FDG uptake within the arterial wall was assessed. Results In FH patients, the mean arterial TBR was higher compared with healthy controls (2.12 ± 0.27 vs. 1.92 ± 0.19; p = 0.03). A significant correlation was observed between baseline arterial TBR and LDL-C (R = 0.37; p = 0.03) that remained significant after adjusting for statin use (β = 0.001; p = 0.02) and atherosclerosis risk factors (β = 0.001; p = 0.03). LDL-C levels were significantly reduced after lipoprotein apheresis (284 ± 118 mg/dl vs. 127 ± 50 mg/dl; p < 0.001). There was a significant reduction of arterial inflammation after lipoprotein apheresis (TBR: 2.05 ± 0.31 vs. 1.91 ± 0.33; p < 0.02). Conclusions The arterial wall of FH patients is characterized by increased inflammation, which is markedly reduced after lipoprotein apheresis. This lends support to a causal role of apoprotein B–containing lipoproteins in arterial wall inflammation and supports the concept that lipoprotein-lowering therapies may impart anti-inflammatory effects by reducing atherogenic lipoproteins. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of new-onset diabetes (NOD) with cardiovascular (CV) event reduction at different levels of NOD risk. Background: Statins reduce the number of CV events but increase the incidence of NOD. We previously reported that 4 factors independently predicted NOD: fasting blood glucose >100 mg/dl, fasting triglycerides >150 mg/dl, body mass index >30 kg/m2, and history of hypertension. Methods: We compared NOD incidence with CV event reduction among 15,056 patients with coronary disease but without diabetes at baseline in the TNT (Treating to New Targets) (n = 7,595) and IDEAL (Incremental Decrease in Endpoints Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering) (n = 7,461) trials. CV events included coronary heart disease death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and resuscitated cardiac arrest. Results: Among 8,825 patients with 0 to 1 of the aforementioned NOD risk factors at baseline, NOD developed in 142 of 4,407 patients in the atorvastatin 80 mg group and in 148 of 4,418 in the atorvastatin 10 mg and simvastatin 20 to 40 mg groups (3.22% vs. 3.35%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.97; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.77 to 1.22). Among the remaining 6,231 patients with 2 to 4 NOD risk factors, NOD developed in 448 of 3,128 in the atorvastatin 80 mg group and in 368 of 3,103 in the lower-dose groups (14.3% vs. 11.9%; HR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.42; p = 0.0027). The number of CV events was significantly reduced with atorvastatin 80 mg in both NOD risk groups. Conclusions: Compared with lower-dose statin therapy, atorvastatin 80 mg/day did not increase the incidence of NOD in patients with 0 to 1 NOD risk factors but did, by 24%, among patients with 2 to 4 NOD risk factors. The number of CV events was significantly reduced with atorvastatin 80 mg in both NOD risk groups. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether high levels of circulating proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) would increase cardiovascular risk in statin-treated patients. Background: Statins activate low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene expression, thus lowering plasma LDL levels. But statins also activate the expression of PCSK9, a secreted inhibitor of the LDL receptor, thereby limiting their beneficial effects. Methods: We have measured the plasma PCSK9 levels of 1,613 patients with stable coronary heart disease enrolled in the Treating to New Targets study, a randomized trial that compared the efficacy of high- versus low-dose atorvastatin. After a run-in period with atorvastatin 10 mg daily, patients were randomized to either continue with 10 mg or be up-titrated to 80 mg of atorvastatin, and followed during 5 years for major cardiovascular events (MCVEs). Results: Circulating PCSK9 levels measured at randomization were predictive of clinical outcomes in the group randomized to remain on atorvastatin 10 mg (p = 0.039), but not in the group that intensified atorvastatin treatment to 80 mg (p = 0.24). Further, PCSK9 levels measured 1 year post-randomization did not change upon increase of the statin dose. Conclusions: PCSK9 levels predict cardiovascular events in patients treated with low-dose atorvastatin. (A Study to Determine the Degree of Additional Reduction in CV Risk in Lowering LDL Below Minimum Target Levels [TNT]; NCT00327691) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The goal of this study was to determine whether residual risk after high-dose statin therapy for primary prevention individuals with reduced levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is related to on-treatment apolipoprotein B, non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non–HDL-C), trigylcerides, or lipid ratios, and how they compare with on-treatment LDL-C. Background: Guidelines focus on LDL-C as the primary target of therapy, yet residual risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) among statin-treated individuals remains high and not fully explained. Methods: Participants in the randomized placebo-controlled JUPITER (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin) trial were adults without diabetes or CVD, with baseline LDL-C levels <130 mg/dl, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels ≥2 mg/l, and triglyceride concentrations <500 mg/dl. Individuals allocated to receive rosuvastatin 20 mg daily with baseline and on-treatment lipids and lipoproteins were examined in relation to the primary endpoint of incident CVD (nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, arterial revascularization, or cardiovascular death). Results: Using separate multivariate Cox models, statistically significant associations of a similar magnitude with residual risk of CVD were found for on-treatment LDL-C, non–HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, total cholesterol/HDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C, and apolipoprotein B/A-I. The respective adjusted standardized hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for each of these measures were 1.31 (1.09 to 1.56), 1.25 (1.04 to 1.50), 1.27 (1.06 to 1.53), 1.22 (1.03 to 1.44), 1.29 (1.09 to 1.52), and 1.27 (1.09 to 1.49). The overall residual risk and the risk associated with these measures decreased among participants achieving on-treatment LDL-C ≤70 mg/dl, on-treatment non–HDL-C ≤100 mg/dl, or on-treatment apolipoprotein B ≤80 mg/dl. In contrast, on-treatment triglycerides showed no association with CVD. Conclusions: In this primary prevention trial of nondiabetic individuals with low LDL-C and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, on-treatment LDL-C was as valuable as non–HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, or ratios in predicting residual risk. (JUPITER—Crestor 20mg Versus Placebo in Prevention of Cardiovascular [CV] Events; NCT00239681) [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the role of reduced lecithin: cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) function on atherogenesis using 3.0-T carotid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and B-mode ultrasound. Background: The role of low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol as a causal factor in atherogenesis has recently been questioned. LCAT plays a key role in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol metabolism. Methods: Carotid 3.0-T MRI and B-mode ultrasound measurements were performed in 40 carriers of LCAT gene mutations and 40 controls, matched for age. Patients with cardiovascular disease were excluded. Results: Carriers had 31% lower LCAT activity levels and 38% decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (both p < 0.001 vs. controls). Carriers presented with a 10% higher normalized wall index (0.34 ± 0.07 vs. 0.31 ± 0.04, p = 0.002), a 22% higher mean wall area (17.3 ± 8.5 mm2 vs. 14.2 ± 4.1 mm2, p = 0.01), and a 22% higher total wall volume (1,039 ± 508 mm3 vs. 851 ± 247 mm3, p = 0.01 vs. controls) as measured by MRI. The prevalence (20 vs. 5, p = 0.002) and the total volume (102 mm3 vs. 3 mm3) of atherosclerotic plaque components on MRI relating to lipid-rich tissue or calcification were also higher in carriers than in controls. All differences retained significance after adjustment for age, sex, blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, body mass index, smoking, and family history of cardiovascular disease. Common carotid intima-media thickness measured with ultrasound was increased in carriers by 12.5% (0.72 ± 0.33 mm vs. 0.64 ± 0.15 mm, p = 0.14). Conclusions: Carriers of LCAT gene mutations exhibit increased carotid atherosclerosis, indicating an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. The present findings imply that increasing LCAT activity may be an attractive target in cardiovascular prevention strategies. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of RVX-208, the first oral agent designed to enhance apolipoprotein (apo) A-I synthesis. Background: No agent that selectively induces synthesis of apoA-I has reached an advanced stage of clinical development. Methods: A total of 299 statin-treated patients with coronary artery disease were treated with placebo or with RVX-208 at a dose of 50, 100, or 150 mg twice daily for 12 weeks. Changes in lipid-related biomarkers, in addition to safety and tolerability, of RVX-208 were investigated. Results: For each dose of RVX-208, individual pairwise comparisons of apoA-I changes with placebo, the primary end point, did not achieve statistical significance. However, treatment with RVX-208 was associated with a dose-dependent increase in apoA-I levels by up to 5.6% (p = 0.035 for trend). Administration of RVX-208 resulted in significant increases in levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ranging from 3.2% to 8.3% (p = 0.02), and large HDL particles increased by 11.1% to 21.1% (p = 0.003). ApoA-I levels increased rapidly from 8 to 12 weeks, suggesting that peak pharmacological effect has not been achieved by the end of the 12-week study. Transient and reversible elevations in liver transaminases >3 times the upper limit of normal were observed in 18 patients treated with RVX-208, with no associated increase in bilirubin levels. Conclusions: Administration of RVX-208 for 12 weeks was associated with increases in apoA-I, HDL-C, and concentration of large HDL particles, consistent with facilitation of cholesterol mobilization. Maximal increases in apoA-I may require longer exposure. An increase in liver enzymes was observed with active treatment. (Clinical Trial for Dose Finding and Safety of RVX000222 in Subjects With Stable Coronary Artery Disease; NCT01058018) [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between lipid and nonlipid biomarker levels achieved during statin therapy and the incidence of major cardiovascular events (MCVEs) in patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD). Background: Several plasma nonlipid biomarkers have been shown to predict MCVEs in population studies. Methods: This is a nested case-control study in the TNT (Treating to New Targets) study population, a randomized trial that compared the efficacy of high- (80 mg) versus low-dose (10 mg) atorvastatin for the secondary prevention of CHD. Fasting plasma levels of standard lipids and of 18 nonlipid biomarkers were obtained after an 8-week run-in period on atorvastatin 10 mg and again 1 year after being randomized to 10 or 80 mg atorvastatin in 507 patients who experienced MCVEs during the 4.9 years of study follow-up and in 1,020 control subjects. An MCVE was defined as CHD death; nonfatal, non–procedure-related myocardial infarction; resuscitated cardiac arrest; or fatal or nonfatal stroke. Results: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides were all predictive of recurrent MCVEs (p ≤ 0.009). Concentrations of many of the 18 nonlipid biomarkers were lowered by atorvastatin therapy (independent of dose). However, almost none of the nonlipid biomarker levels, whether measured after the 8-week run-in period or after 1 year of treatment with 10 or 80 mg atorvastatin, were predictive of recurrent MCVEs. Conclusions: In patients with stable CHD, atorvastatin improved plasma levels of an expanded panel of nonlipid biomarkers. However, independently of atorvastatin dose, the achieved levels of the vast majority of nonlipid biomarkers did not predict MCVEs. (A Study to Determine the Degree of Additional Reduction in CV Risk in Lowering LDL Below Minimum Target Levels [TNT]; NCT00327691) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study sought to assess whether oxidation-specific biomarkers are associated with an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) events. Background: The relationship of a panel of oxidative biomarkers and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] to CAD risk is not fully determined. Methods: A prospective case-control study nested in the EPIC (European Prospective Investigation of Cancer)-Norfolk cohort of 45- to 79-year-old apparently healthy men and women followed for ∼6 years was designed. Cases consisted of participants in whom fatal or nonfatal CAD developed, matched by sex, age, and enrollment time with controls without CAD. Baseline levels of oxidized phospholipids on apolipoprotein B-100 particles and Lp(a) were measured in 763 cases and 1,397 controls. Their relationship to secretory phospholipase A2 type IIA mass and activity, myeloperoxidase mass, and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 activity and association with CAD events were determined. Results: After adjusting for age, smoking, diabetes, low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure, the highest tertiles of oxidized phospholipids on apolipoprotein B-100 particles and Lp(a) were associated with a significantly higher risk of CAD events (odds ratios: 1.67 and 1.64, respectively; p < 0.001) compared with the lowest tertiles. The odds ratio of CAD events associated with the highest tertiles of oxidized phospholipids on apolipoprotein B-100 particles or Lp(a) was significantly potentiated (approximately doubled) by the highest tertiles of secretory phospholipase A2 activity and mass but less so for myeloperoxidase and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 activity. The odds ratios for fatal CAD were higher than for the combined end point. After taking into account the Framingham Risk Score, c-index values progressively increased when oxidative biomarkers were added to the model. Conclusions: This EPIC-Norfolk study links pathophysiologically related oxidation-specific biomarkers and Lp(a) with CAD events. Oxidation-specific biomarkers provide cumulative predictive value when added to traditional cardiovascular risk factors. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mipomersen in hypercholesterolemic subjects taking stable statin therapy. Background: Mipomersen is an apolipoprotein (apo) B synthesis inhibitor that has demonstrated significant reductions in apo B and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in Phase 1 clinical trials in healthy volunteers. Methods: A randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation Phase 2 study was designed to evaluate the effects of mipomersen in hypercholesterolemic subjects taking stable statin therapy. Seventy-four subjects were enrolled sequentially into 1 of 6 dose cohorts at a 4:1 (active/placebo) ratio. Subjects received 7 doses of 30 to 400 mg over 5 weeks in the first 5 cohorts and 15 doses of 200 mg over 13 weeks in the sixth cohort. Pre-specified end points included percentage change from baseline in apo B and LDL cholesterol. Safety was assessed with laboratory test results and by the incidence and severity of adverse events. Results: The apo B and LDL cholesterol were reduced by 19% to 54% and 21% to 52%, respectively, at doses of 100 mg/week mipomersen and higher in the 5-week treatment cohorts. Efficacy seemed to increase upon treatment for 13 weeks at a dose of 200 mg/week. Injection site reactions (mild to moderate erythema [90%]) and hepatic transaminase increases (17%) were the most common adverse events, leading to discontinuation in 2 subjects and 1 subject, respectively. In the 13-week treatment cohort, 5 of 10 subjects (50%) had elevations ≥3× the upper limit of normal, 4 of which persisted on 2 consecutive occasions. Conclusions: Mipomersen might hold promise for treatment of patients not reaching target LDL cholesterol levels on stable statin therapy. Further studies are needed to address the mechanisms and clinical relevance of transaminase changes after mipomersen administration. (Dose-Escalating Safety Study in Subjects on Stable Statin Therapy; NCT00231569) [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin therapy for children with familial hypercholesterolemia. Background: Familial hypercholesterolemia is a common inherited disorder causing markedly elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels from birth and resulting in premature atherosclerosis. In children, statins have been shown to be effective in reducing LDL-C, restoring flow-mediated dilation, and slowing carotid intima-media thickening. However, few children in these trials achieved current LDL-C goals. Methods: This study comprised a 12-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, followed by a 40-week open-label, titration-to-goal extension phase in 177 pubertal children, ages 10 to 17 years, with familial hypercholesterolemia. Participants were randomly assigned to placebo or rosuvastatin 5, 10, or 20 mg once daily. Results: Compared with placebo, rosuvastatin 5, 10, and 20 mg reduced LDL-C by 38%, 45%, and 50%, respectively (p < 0.001 for each group vs. placebo). With a maximum allowed dose of 20 mg, 40% achieved the treatment goal of <110 mg/dl during the open-label, titration-to-goal phase. Rosuvastatin was well tolerated, with no apparent adverse impact on growth or development. Conclusions: In children with familial hypercholesterolemia, rosuvastatin 20 mg daily reduced LDL-C by 50%. Nonetheless, only 40% attained the consensus LDL-C target of <110 mg/dl, reflecting these patients'' high baseline LDL-C levels (mean, 232 mg/dl). (Pediatric Lipid-Reduction Trial of Rosuvastatin [PLUTO]; NCT00355615) [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: This study was designed to test the hypothesis that at any low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, other lipid parameters such as non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, triglyceride (TG) levels, and the total cholesterol (TC)/HDL-C are still associated with an increased coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. Background: Although LDL-C is considered to be the primary target of lipid-lowering therapy, other parameters of the lipoprotein-lipid profile may more closely associated with CHD risk. Methods: In the EPIC (European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition)-Norfolk prospective population study, 21,448 participants without diabetes or CHD between age 45 and 79 years were followed for 11.0 years. A total of 2,086 participants developed CHD during follow-up. Results: Among individuals with low LDL-C levels (<100 mg/dl), after adjustment for age, sex, smoking, systolic blood pressure, waist circumference, physical activity, and hormone replacement therapy (in women), those with non–HDL-C >130 mg/dl had a hazard ratio (HR) for future CHD of 1.84 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12 to 3.04) when compared with those with non–HDL-C levels <130 mg/dl. In a similar model, individuals with TG levels >150 mg/dl had an HR of 1.63 (95% CI: 1.02 to 2.59) when compared with those with TG levels <150 mg/dl, and individuals with a TC/HDL-C ratio >5 had an HR of 2.19 (95% CI: 1.22 to 3.93) when compared with those with a TC/HDL-C ratio <5. Conclusions: In this prospective study, independently of their plasma LDL-C levels, participants with high non–HDL-C levels, high TG levels, or with an elevated TC/HDL-C ratio were at increased CHD risk. CHD risk assessment algorithms as well as lipid targets of lipid-lowering trials may also need to consider other easily available parameters such as non–HDL-C. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: This post-hoc analysis of the IDEAL (Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering) trial was designed to assess the comparative treatment efficacy of high-dose atorvastatin and usual-dose simvastatin for the prevention of events subsequent to the first event, using the Wei, Lin, and Weissfeld method. Background: Time-to-first-event analysis of data is frequently utilized to provide efficacy outcome information in coronary heart disease prevention trials. However, during the course of such long-term trials, a large number of events occur subsequent to the first event, the analysis of which will be precluded by this approach. Methods: The Wei, Lin, and Weissfeld method allows the analysis of repeated occurrence of events of the same type or of entirely different natures. It regards the recurrence times as multivariate event (failure) times, and models the marginal (individual) distribution for each event with the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: In the IDEAL trial, compared with patients taking simvastatin 20 to 40 mg daily, patients receiving atorvastatin 80 mg daily had their relative risk of a first cardiovascular event reduced by 17% (p < 0.0001), of a second by 24% (p < 0.0001), of a third by 19% (p = 0.035), of a fourth by 24% (p = 0.058), and of a fifth by 28% (p = 0.117). Conclusions: Our results indicate that intensive statin therapy continues to be more effective than standard statin therapy, even beyond the first event, and suggest that clinicians should not hesitate to prescribe high-dose statin therapy for patients experiencing multiple recurrent cardiovascular events. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of long-term coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin in adolescents with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH). Background: Aggressive intervention to achieve lipid goals for adolescents with HeFH is recommended to reduce risk of premature cardiovascular disease. Methods: In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 248 male and female subjects ages ≥10 and ≤17 years with HeFH were randomized to receive: step 1: simvastatin 10, 20, or 40 mg/day plus ezetimibe 10 mg/day or placebo for 6 weeks, followed by step 2: simvastatin 40 mg/day plus ezetimibe 10 mg/day or placebo for 27 weeks; followed by step 3: all subjects received open-label simvastatin 10 or 20 mg/day (titrated to maximum 40 mg/day) plus ezetimibe 10 mg/day for 20 weeks. Safety was assessed throughout the study. Results: Coadministered ezetimibe and simvastatin for 6 weeks (step 1) resulted in significantly greater mean reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline (49.5%) compared with simvastatin monotherapy (34.4%; p < 0.01) in pooled dose groups and in individual dose groups (46.7% vs. 30.4%, 49.5% vs. 34.3%, 52.1% vs. 38.6%, respectively; p < 0.01). At 33 weeks (step 2), ezetimibe-simvastatin subjects had a mean 54.0% reduction in LDL-C compared with a mean 38.1% reduction in simvastatin monotherapy subjects (p < 0.01). At 53 weeks (step 3), the pooled reduction in LDL-C was 49.1%. All treatment regimens were well tolerated throughout 53 weeks. Conclusions: Coadministration of ezetimibe with simvastatin was safe, well tolerated, and provided higher LDL-C reduction compared with simvastatin alone in adolescents with HeFH studied up to 53 weeks. (Effects of Ezetimibe With Simvastatin in the Therapy of Adolescents With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia; NCT00129402) [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: The aim of this post hoc analysis from the TNT (Treating to New Targets) trial is to determine whether patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery achieved clinical benefit from intensive low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol lowering. Background: The development and progression of atherosclerosis is accelerated in coronary venous bypass grafts. Methods: A total of 10,001 patients with documented coronary disease, including 4,654 with previous CABG, were randomized to atorvastatin 80 or 10 mg/day and were followed for a median of 4.9 years. The primary end point was the occurrence of a first major cardiovascular event (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or stroke). Results: A first major cardiovascular event occurred in 11.4% of the patients with prior CABG and 8.5% of those without prior CABG (p < 0.001). In CABG patients, mean LDL-cholesterol levels at study end were 79 mg/dl in the 80-mg arm and 101 mg/dl in the 10-mg arm, and the primary event rate was 9.7% in the 80-mg arm and 13.0% in the 10-mg arm (hazard ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.87, p = 0.0004). Repeat revascularization during follow-up, either CABG or percutaneous coronary intervention, was performed in 11.3% of the CABG patients in the 80-mg arm and 15.9% in the 10-mg arm (hazard ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.82, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Intensive LDL-cholesterol lowering to a mean of 79 mg/dl with atorvastatin 80 mg/day in patients with previous CABG reduces major cardiovascular events by 27% and the need for repeat coronary revascularization by 30%, compared with less intensive cholesterol-lowering to a mean of 101 mg/dl with atorvastatin 10 mg/day. (A Study to Determine the Degree of Additional Reduction in CV Risk in Lowering LDL Below Minimum Target Levels [TNT]; NCT00327691) [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: This study was designed to assess the relationship of high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), HDL particle size, and apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) with the occurrence of coronary artery disease (CAD), with a focus on the effect of very high values of these parameters. Background: High plasma levels of HDL-C and apoA-I are inversely related to the risk of CAD. However, recent data suggest that this relationship does not hold true for very high HDL-C levels, particularly when a preponderance of large HDL particles is observed. Methods: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of 2 prospective studies: the IDEAL (Incremental Decrease in End Points through Aggressive Lipid Lowering; n = 8,888) trial comparing the efficacy of high-dose to usual-dose statin treatment for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events, and the EPIC (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition)-Norfolk case-control study, including apparently healthy individuals who did (cases, n = 858) or did not (control patients, n = 1,491) develop CAD during follow-up. In IDEAL, only HDL-C and apoA-I were available; in EPIC-Norfolk, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy-determined HDL particle sizes were also available. Results: In the IDEAL study, higher HDL-C proved a significant major cardiac event risk factor following adjustment for age, gender, smoking, apoA-I, and apoB. A similar association was observed for HDL particle size in EPIC-Norfolk. Increased risk estimates were particularly present in the high ends of the distributions. In contrast, apoA-I remained negatively associated across the major part of its distribution in both studies. Conclusions: When apoA-I and apoB are kept constant, HDL-C and HDL particle size may confer risk at very high values. This does not hold true for very high levels of apoA-I at fixed levels of HDL-C and apoB. These findings may have important consequences for assessment and treatment of CAD risk. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: We evaluated whether serum myeloperoxidase (MPO) levels are associated with the risk of future development of coronary artery disease (CAD) in apparently healthy individuals. Background: An enzyme of the innate immune system, MPO exhibits a wide array of proatherogenic effects. These include induction of oxidative damage to low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and promotion of plaque vulnerability. Recent studies revealed that MPO independently predicts adverse outcomes in patients with chest pain or suspected acute coronary syndrome. Methods: Myeloperoxidase was measured in baseline samples of a case-control study nested in the prospective EPIC (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition)-Norfolk population study. Case subjects (n = 1,138) were apparently healthy men and women who developed CAD during 8-year follow-up. Control subjects (n = 2,237), matched for age, gender, and enrollment time, remained free of CAD. Results: The MPO levels were significantly higher in case subjects than in control subjects and correlated with C-reactive protein (CRP) (ρ = 0.25; p < 0.001) and white blood cell count (ρ = 0.33; p < 0.001). Risk of future CAD increased in consecutive quartiles of MPO concentration, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.49 in the top versus bottom quartile (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20 to 1.84; p < 0.001). After adjustment for traditional risk factors, the OR in the top quartile remained significant at 1.36 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.73). Elevated MPO levels (>728 pmol/l) similarly predicted increased risk of future CAD among participants with either LDL-cholesterol <130 mg/dl, HDL-cholesterol >50 mg/dl, or CRP <2.0 mg/l (OR 1.52 [95% CI 1.21 to 1.91], 1.59 [95% CI 1.24 to 2.05], and 1.42 [95% CI 1.14 to 1.77)], respectively). Conclusion: Elevated MPO levels predict future risk of CAD in apparently healthy individuals. This study suggests that inflammatory activation precedes the onset of overt CAD by many years. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: We assessed relations of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle number (LDL-P) and LDL particle size as measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and the risk of future coronary artery disease (CAD). Background: Whereas LDL-C is an established risk factor for CAD, its discriminative power is limited. Measuring LDL-P and size may have stronger associations with CAD than LDL-C. Methods: A nested case-control study was performed in the prospective EPIC (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition)-Norfolk study, which comprises 25,663 subjects. Cases (n = 1,003) were individuals who developed CAD during 6 year follow-up. Control subjects (n = 1,885) were matched for age, gender, and enrollment time. Odds ratios (ORs) for future CAD were calculated, and we also evaluated whether LDL-P could improve the Framingham risk score (FRS) to predict CAD. Results: In univariate analyses, LDL-P (OR 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58 to 2.59) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non–HDL-C) (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.69) were more closely associated with CAD than LDL-C (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.18). The additional value of LDL-P was lost after adjustment for HDL-C and triglyceride levels. Whereas LDL size was inversely related to CAD (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.76), this relation was abolished upon adjustment for LDL-P. In a model adjusted for the FRS, LDL-P retained its association with CAD (p for trend 0.02). Conclusions: In this large study of individuals with moderately elevated LDL-C, LDL-P was related to CAD on top of FRS as well as after adjusting for LDL-C. The additional value of LDL-P was comparable to non–HDL-C, and it was abolished after adjusting for triglycerides and HDL-C. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: We sought to assess the effects on cerebrovascular events of treating patients with stable coronary disease with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels substantially below 100 mg/dl. Background: Lowering LDL-C with statins has been shown to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with stable coronary disease. In observational studies, naturally low cholesterol levels have been associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke. The cerebrovascular benefits of treating patients with stable coronary disease to LDL-C levels substantially below 100 mg/dl have not been previously investigated. Methods: We describe an analysis of cerebrovascular events in the Treating to New Targets study, a trial where 10,001 patients with documented coronary disease were randomized to treatment with atorvastatin at 10 mg/day or 80 mg/day and followed for a median of 4.9 years. Results: Mean LDL-C levels were 101 mg/dl on 10 mg atorvastatin and 77 mg/dl on 80 mg. In addition to the reduction in major cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69 to 0.89; p = 0.0002), the primary end point of the trial, patients in the 80-mg arm experienced a reduction in cerebrovascular events (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.93; p = 0.007) and stroke (hazard ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.96; p = 0.02). Each 1-mg/dl reduction in LDL-C with treatment was associated with a 0.6% relative risk reduction in cerebrovascular events (p = 0.002) and a 0.5% relative risk reduction in stroke (p = 0.041). The incidence of hemorrhagic stroke was similar in the 80-mg and 10-mg groups, 16 and 18 respectively, and the hemorrhagic strokes were distributed evenly across quintiles of achieved LDL-C during treatment. Conclusions: Among patients with established coronary disease, treating to an LDL-cholesterol substantially below 100 mg/dl with 80 mg/day atorvastatin reduces both stroke and cerebrovascular events by an additional 20% to 25% compared with the 10 mg/day dose. An increase in hemorrhagic stroke was not seen at low LDL-C levels. (Treating to New Targets; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00327691). [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: To assess the role of oxidized phospholipids (OxPLs) in children with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and the effect of pravastatin. Background: Oxidized phospholipids are a major component of oxidized low-density lipoprotein (OxLDL) and are bound to lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)]. The significance of OxPL markers in children is unknown. Methods: Children with FH were randomized to placebo (n = 88) or pravastatin (n = 90) after instruction on American Heart Association step II diet. Unaffected siblings (n = 78) served as controls. The OxPL content on apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB) detected by antibody E06 (OxPL/apoB ratio), immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM immune complexes per apoB (IC/apoB) and on all apoB particles (total apoB-IC = IC/apoB multiplied by plasma apoB levels), autoantibodies to malondialdehyde (MDA)–low-density lipoprotein (LDL), Lp(a), and apoB levels were measured at baseline and after two years of treatment. Results: Compared with unaffected siblings, children with FH had significantly lower levels of OxPL/apoB but higher levels of IgG and IgM total apoB-IC and IgM MDA-LDL autoantibodies. From baseline to two-year follow-up, compared with placebo pravastatin treatment resulted in a greater mean percentage change in apoB (−18.7% vs. 0.3%; p = 0.001), total IgG apoB-IC (−31.9% vs. −12.2%; p < 0.001), and total IgM apoB-IC (−25.5% vs. 13.2%; p = 0.001). Interestingly, pravastatin also resulted in higher OxPL/apoB (48.7% vs. 29.3%; p = 0.028) and Lp(a) levels (21.9% vs. 10.7%; p = 0.044). Conclusions: Compared with unaffected siblings, children with FH are characterized by elevated levels of apoB-IC and IgM MDA-LDL autoantibodies. Compared with placebo, pravastatin led to a greater reduction in apoB-IC but also to a greater increase in OxPL/apoB and Lp(a), which may represent a novel mechanism of mobilization and clearance of OxPL. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Lipoprotein Lipase Gene Polymorphisms and the Risk of Target Vessel Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Pascalle S. Monraats, Jamal S. Rana, Melchior C. Nierman, Nuno M. M. Pires, Aeilko H. Zwinderman, John J. P. Kastelein, Jan Albert Kuivenhoven, Moniek P. M. de Maat, Saskia Z. H. Rittersma, Abbey Schepers, Pieter A. F. Doevendans, Robbert J. de Winter, Rene A. Tio, Rune R. Frants, Paul H. A. Quax, Arnoud van Der Laarse, Ernst E. van Der Wall, J. Wouter Jukema Genetic factors are important in the restenotic process after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, we examined the impact of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) gene polymorphisms on restenosis, defined by target vessel revascularization (TVR) in a large patient population undergoing successful PCI. Systematic genotyping of four polymorphisms in the LPL gene was performed. The role of LPL in restenosis was also assessed in apolipoprotein E (ApoE)*3-Leiden transgenic mice. Carriers of the 447Ter allele of the LPL enzyme showed a lower risk of TVR compared with 447Ser homozygotes (p = 0.005). In the mouse model, LPL messenger ribonucleic acid levels increased 40-fold compared with control arteries. Clinical and animal data indicate that LPL plays a role in restenosis. Objectives: We sought to identify polymorphisms in genes that predispose to restenosis. Background: Variations in the lipoprotein lipase (LPL) gene have been implicated in a number of pathophysiologic conditions associated with coronary heart disease. The present study examines the impact of polymorphisms in the LPL gene on restenosis (defined by target vessel revascularization [TVR]) in a large patient population undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A mouse model for restenosis was used to further investigate LPL’s role in restenosis. Methods: The GENetic DEterminants of Restenosis (GENDER) project is a multicenter, prospective study design that enrolled 3,104 consecutive patients after successful PCI. These patients were genotyped for four different LPL gene polymorphisms. In apolipoprotein E (ApoE)*3-Leiden transgenic mice, arterial messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) was used to assess LPL expression during a cuff-induced restenotic process. Results: Using multivariable analysis, carriers of the 447Ter allele of the LPL enzyme showed a lower risk of TVR compared with 447Ser homozygotes (p = 0.005). In the mouse model, LPL mRNA levels were increased 40-fold compared with control arteries at 6 h after cuff placement. Conclusions: The LPL C/G polymorphism (Ser447Ter), resulting in a truncation of the two C-terminal amino acids of the mature LPL protein, appears to be an important protective factor for TVR in humans. The role of LPL in this process was further established in a mouse model, where LPL expression was very strongly up-regulated in the target arterial wall, suggesting a contribution of this lipolytic enzyme to restenosis. Possibly, LPL Ser447Ter genotyping may lead to better risk stratification and tailored therapy in the prevention of restenosis after PCI. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We investigated the consequences of an apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) gene defect with regard to lipid metabolism, endothelial function, arterial wall thickness, and coronary artery disease (CAD) risk.Due to limited numbers of carriers of the apoA-I defects, data on the consequences of such defects have remained inconclusive.Lipids and lipoproteins were measured in 54 apoA-I (L178P) carriers and 147 nonaffected siblings. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was assessed in 29 carriers and 45 noncarriers, and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) could be determined in 33 heterozygotes and 40 controls. Moreover, CAD risk was evaluated for all apoA-I mutation carriers.Heterozygotes exhibited lower plasma levels of apoA-I (−50%; p < 0.0001) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (−63%; p < 0.0001). In addition, carriers had impaired FMD (p = 0.012) and increased carotid IMT (p < 0.001), whereas multivariate analysis revealed that heterozygotes had a striking 24-fold increase in CAD risk (p = 0.003).Heterozygosity for a novel apoA-I mutation underlies a detrimental lipoprotein profile that is associated with endothelial dysfunction, accelerated carotid arterial wall thickening, and severely enhanced CAD risk. Importantly, the extent of atherosclerosis in these subjects was similar to the burden of premature arterial wall abnormalities seen in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. These data illustrate the pivotal role in humans of apoA-I in the protection against CAD. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

: ObjectivesOn the basis of quantitative coronary angiography data, the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) TaqIB gene polymorphism has been postulated to predict the progression of coronary atherosclerosis and response to cholesterol-lowering therapy.: BackgroundCholesteryl ester transfer protein mediates the exchange of lipids between anti-atherogenic high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and atherogenic apolipoprotein B containing lipoproteins and therefore plays a key role in human lipid metabolism. Hence, CETP gene polymorphisms may alter susceptibility to atherosclerosis.: MethodsTo investigate the significance of the CETP TaqIB gene polymorphism with respect to clinical end points, we used the Cholesterol And Recurrent Events (CARE) cohort. The CARE study was designed to investigate the effect of five years of pravastatin therapy on coronary events.: ResultsWe found that the odds ratios for the primary end point were not significantly different from unity for the three genetic subgroups after five years of placebo treatment. Furthermore, pravastatin induced similar changes in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol among TaqIB genotypes, and both nonfatal myocardial infarction and deaths from coronary heart disease were reduced to the same extent in all three genotypes.: ConclusionsIn the CARE cohort, the CETP TaqIB polymorphism does not predict cardiovascular events or discriminate between those who will or will not benefit from pravastatin treatment. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

: ObjectivesIn the present study, we investigated the effects of statins on serum levels of soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH).: BackgroundAtherosclerotic disease seems to involve inflammatory and immunologic mechanisms, and sCD40L has recently been identified as one of the key players in the atherosclerotic process. HMG-Co A reductase inhibitors, statins, have been recognized as immunomodulators and reduce cardiovascular events and mortality, but the effects of statins on sCD40L has not been clarified.: MethodsIn a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial, as part of the Atorvastatin versus Simvastatin on Atherosclerosis Progression (ASAP) trial, 110 patients with FH were given atorvastatin 80 mg/daily (n = 57) or simvastatin 40 mg/daily (n = 53) for two years.: ResultsOur main findings were: 1) at baseline patients with FH had significantly higher (approximately 27-fold) serum levels of sCD40L than healthy controls; 2) statin therapy markedly decreased serum levels of sCD40L (approximately 40% reduction); 3) this decrease in sCD40L was found during both “aggressive” (i.e., atorvastatin) and “conventional” (i.e., simvastatin) statin therapy and was not correlated with the degree of reduction in cholesterol levels.: ConclusionsOur findings may suggest enhanced CD40L-CD40 interaction in FH and that this inflammatory response may be downregulated by statins. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

: ObjectivesThis study was designed to determine whether simvastatin improves endothelial function in children with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH).: BackgroundEndothelial function measured by flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery (FMD) is used as a surrogate marker of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Adult studies have shown that statins reverse endothelial dysfunction and therefore reduce the risk for future CVD.: MethodsThe study included 50 children with FH (9 to 18 years) and 19 healthy, non-FH controls. Children with FH were randomized to receive simvastatin or placebo for 28 weeks. The FMD was performed at baseline and at 28 weeks of treatment.: ResultsAt baseline, FMD was impaired in children with FH versus non-FH controls (p < 0.024). In the simvastatin FH group, FMD improved significantly, whereas the FMD remained unaltered in the placebo FH group throughout the study period (absolute increase 3.9% ± 4.3% vs. 1.2% ± 3.9%, p < 0.05). In the simvastatin FH group, FMD increased to a level similar to the non-FH controls (15.6% ± 6.8% vs. 15.5% ± 5.4%, p = 0.958). Upon treatment, the simvastatin FH group showed significant absolute reductions of total cholesterol (TC) (−2.16 ± 1.04 mmol/l, 30.1%) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (−2.13 ± 0.99 mmol/l, 39.8%). The absolute change of FMD after 28 weeks of therapy was inversely correlated to changes of TC (r = −0.31, p < 0.05) and LDL-C (r = −0.31, p < 0.05).: ConclusionsOur data show significant improvement of endothelial dysfunction towards normal levels after short-term simvastatin therapy in children with FH. These results emphasize the relevance of statin therapy in patients with FH at an early stage, when the atherosclerotic process is still reversible. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]