Search

Objectives: The purpose of the study was to determine the effectiveness of a collaborative educational, continuous quality improvement (CQI) initiative to increase appropriate use of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Background: Potential overuse of CCTA has prompted multisociety appropriate use criteria (AUC) publications. Methods: This prospective, observational study was conducted with pre-intervention (July 2007 to June 2008), intervention (July 2008 to June 2010), and follow-up (July 2010 to December 2010) periods during which patients were enrolled in the Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium (ACIC) at 47 Michigan hospitals. Continuous education was provided to referring physicians. The possibility of losing third-party payer coverage in the absence of a measurable change in AUC was emphasized. AUC was compared between the 3 periods. Results: The study group included 25,387 patients. Compared with the pre-intervention period, there was a 23.4% increase in appropriate (61.3% to 80%, p < 0.0001), 60.3% decrease in inappropriate (14.6% to 5.8%, p < 0.0001), 40.8% decrease in uncertain (10.3% to 6.1%, p < 0.0001), and 41.7% decrease in unclassifiable (13.9% to 8.1%, p < 0.0001) scans during follow-up. Between pre-intervention and follow-up, change in CCTA referrals by provider specialty were cardiology (appropriate: 60.4% to 79.5%; inappropriate: 13% to 5.2%; p < 0.0001), internal medicine/family practice (appropriate: 51.1% to 70.4%; inappropriate: 20.2% to 12.5%; p < 0.0001), emergency medicine (appropriate: 83.6% to 91.6%; inappropriate: 9.1% to 0.6%; p < 0.0001), and other (appropriate: 61.1% to 83.2%; inappropriate: 18.6% to 5.9%; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Application of a systematic CQI and emphasis on possible loss of coverage were associated with a significant improvement in the proportion of CCTA examinations meeting AUC across referring physician specialties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the correlation between stress test results and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) findings and comparative diagnostic performance of the 2 modalities in patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Background: Recent data suggest that only a third of patients undergoing ICA have obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD); accurate pre-ICA risk stratification is needed. Methods: At 47 centers participating in the ACIC (Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium) in Michigan, patients without known CAD who were undergoing CCTA within 3 months of a stress test were studied. Demographics, risk factors, symptoms, and stress test results were correlated with obstructive CAD (>50% stenosis) on CCTA and ICA. Results: Among 6,198 patients (age 56 ± 12 years, 48% men), >50% stenosis was seen in 1,158 (18.7%) on CCTA. Independent predictors included male sex (odds ratio [OR]: 2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.83 to 3.06), current smoking (OR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.57 to 3.17), older age (OR per 10-year increment: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.89 to 2.41), hypertension (OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.37 to 2.34), and typical angina (OR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.03 to 2.12). Stress test results were not predictive. Among patients undergoing ICA (n = 621), there was a strong correlation of ICA with CCTA findings (OR: 9.09, 95% CI: 5.57 to 14.8, p < 0.001), but not stress results (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.11, p = 0.17). Conclusions: Stress test findings did not predict obstructive CAD on CCTA, observed in <20% of patients in this large study group. The strong association of CCTA with ICA suggests that it may serve as an effective “gatekeeper” to invasive testing in patients needing adjudication of stress test results. (Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium: A Collaborative Quality Improvement Project [ACIC]; NCT00640068) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We sought to investigate the benefit, predictors of procedural success, and safety of pre-procedural intra-coronary fibrin-specific lytic infusion (ICL) in patients with failed prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO). Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention for CTO remains a challenge with a high incidence of procedural failure secondary to inability to cross the occlusion with the guidewire. Methods: Eighty-five patients who underwent unsuccessful PCI procedures of CTO (more than three months’ duration) had a repeat attempt of recanalization with the use of pre-procedural ICL. Patients received a weight-adjusted dose of either alteplase (tPA) (2 to 5 mg/h) or tenecteplase (TNK) (0.5 mg/h) for a total of 8 h. The total dose of ICL therapy was infused split between the guiding catheter and an intracoronary infusion catheter. A step-down multivariate logistic regression analysis was completed to determine the best predictors of procedural success. In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including myocardial infarction, acute reocclusion, stroke, and death, as well as bleeding complications, were also examined. Results: The procedure was successful in 46 of 85 cases (54%). Four of 85 (5%) contained dissections that did not result in perforations, tamponade, or MACE. The incidence of groin complications was 7 of 85 (8%) and of bleeding complications requiring transfusions was 3 of 85 (3.5%). On multivariate analysis, predictors of success were tapering morphology (odds ratio, 15.5; 95% confidence interval, 3.73 to 63; p = 0.0002) and lack of bridging collaterals (odds ratio, 5.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.53 to 17; p = 0.008). Conclusions: Intracoronary infusion of fibrin-specific thrombolytic therapy may provide a valuable and safe option for facilitating percutaneous revascularization of CTO. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We evaluated whether patients'' clinical status, angioplasty success, or both, should guide discharge after primary angioplasty (i.e., percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Current guidelines do not address a discharge strategy for AMI patients undergoing successful PCI.Patients who underwent PCI in Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) studies (N = 3,188) were classified as “high clinical risk” if they had either age >70 years, Killip class >1, heart rate >100 beats/min, systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg, anterior MI, or left bundle branch block, and as “low clinical risk” if none was present. Successful PCI patients were compared with those with unsuccessful PCI in both groups for 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE).Percutaneous coronary intervention was successful in 668 (90%) of 745 low-risk clinicaland 2,104 (86%) of 2,443 high-risk clinical patients. Regardless of clinical risk status, patients with successful PCI had lower 30-day MACE than those with unsuccessful PCI (low-risk group: 4.6% vs. 22%, p < 0.0001; high-risk group: 7% vs. 21%; p < 0.0001). Moreover, successful PCI patients with either risk status had few MACE after day 4, whereas unsuccessful PCI patients had more MACE. The success of PCI was the strongest independent predictor of 30-day MACE (odds ratio [OR] 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8 to 5.0). A constellation of three or more high-risk clinical features also predicted higher 30-day MACE (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.62 to 3.12).The success of PCI is the prime determinant of clinical outcome after PCI for AMI. The majority of AMI patients with less than three high-risk clinical features who undergo successful PCI may be discharged from the hospital by day 4. In contrast, patients with more than two high-risk clinical features or unsuccessful PCI may need longer observation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: To investigate primary angioplasty (PA) for high-risk acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at hospitals with no cardiac surgery on-site (No SOS), we hypothesized that a nonrandomized registry of such patients treated with PA would show clinical outcomes similar to those of a group randomized to transfer for PA, and that reperfusion would occur faster.Background: Primary angioplasty provides outcomes superior to fibrinolytic therapy in AMI, but its use in community hospitals with No SOS has been limited.Methods: Fibrinolytic-eligible patients with high-risk AMI prospectively consented if they had one or more high-risk characteristic. Nineteen hospitals with No SOS prospectively enrolled 500 patients for PA on-site. Seventy-one similar Air Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction trial patients were randomized to transfer for PA.Results: Primary angioplasty was performed in 88% of patients. Patients transferred for PA had a longer mean time to treatment (187 vs. 120 min; p < 0.0001). Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3 was achieved in 96% for on-site PA, 86% in the transfer group (p = 0.004). The combined primary end point of 30-day mortality, re-infarction, and disabling stroke occurred in 27 (5%) on-site PA patients and 6 (8.5%) transfer patients (p = 0.27). Unadjusted one-year mortality was improved in on-site PA patients compared with those transferred (6% vs. 13%, p = 0.043), but after adjustment for differences in baseline variables, this difference was not significant.Conclusions: On-site PA and transfer groups had similar 30-day outcomes and more rapid reperfusion for on-site PA. Primary angioplasty in high-risk AMI patients at hospitals with No SOS is safe, effective, and faster than PA after transfer to a surgical facility. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: We sought to determine if beta-blocker therapy improves clinical outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Background: We have shown that pre-treatment with beta-blockers has a beneficial effect on short-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary PCI for AMI. It is unknown if beta-blocker therapy after successful primary PCI improves prognosis of AMI.Methods: We analyzed clinical, angiographic, and outcomes data in 2,442 patients who underwent successful primary PCI in the Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction-2 (PAMI-2), PAMI No Surgery-on-Site (PAMI noSOS), Stent PAMI, and Air PAMI trials. We classified patients into beta group (those who received beta-blockers after successful PCI, n = 1,661) and no-beta group (n = 781). We compared death and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (death, reinfarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization) at six months between groups receiving and not receiving beta-blockers.Results: At six months, beta patients were less likely to die (2.2% vs. 6.6%, p < 0.0001) or experience MACE (14 vs. 17%, p = 0.036). In multivariate analysis, beta-blockers were independently associated with lower six-month mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26 to 0.73, p = 0.0016). Beta-blocker therapy was an independent predictor of lower six-month events in high-risk subgroups: ejection fraction ≤50% (death: OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.60, p = 0.0002) or multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) (death: OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.48, p < 0.0001; MACE: OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.80, p = 0.0011).Conclusions: Treatment with beta-blockers after successful primary PCI is associated with reduced six-month mortality, with the greatest benefit in patients with a low ejection fraction or multi-vessel CAD. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

: ObjectivesWe sought to identify the incidence, predictors, and clinical implications of cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs).: BackgroundCerebrovascular accidents after PCI, although rare, can be devastating. Limited information exists regarding the characterization of this complication.: MethodsThe study population comprised 20,679 patients who underwent PCI between September 1993 and April 2002. A CVA was defined as a composite of transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke. The characteristics of those who had a periprocedural CVA were compared with those who did not.: ResultsA CVA occurred in 92 patients (0.30% of procedures). Of these, TIA occurred in 13 patients (0.04%) and stroke in 79 patients (0.25%). On multivariate analysis, patients with this complication more frequently had diabetes mellitus (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 3.0; p = 0.013), hypertension (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.3; p = 0.033), previous CVA (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3 to 4.0; p = 0.0059), and creatinine clearance ≤40 ml/min (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.8 to 5.2; p < 0.0001). They underwent urgent or emergent procedures (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.3 to 5.5; p = 0.0092) with more thrombolytic (OR 4.7, 95% CI 2.3 to 9.7; p < 0.0001) and intravenous heparin (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.4; p = 0.030) use before PCI, and they more often required emergent intra-aortic balloon pump placement (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.3; p = 0.028). On multivariate analysis, CVA was independently associated with in-hospital death (OR 7.8, 95% CI 4.2 to 14.7; p < 0.0001), acute renal failure (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 5.7; p = 0.0042), and new dialysis (OR 3.73, 95% CI 1.01 to 13.8; p = 0.049) after PCI.: ConclusionsCerebrovascular accidents after PCI, although rare, are associated with high rates of in-hospital death and acute renal failure, often requiring dialysis. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: We sought to identify the incidence, predictors, and clinical consequences of one-month reinfarction (RE-MI) in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Background: One-month reinfarction after AMI significantly increases long-term mortality; however, little is known about the incidence and predictors of RE-MI in patients undergoing primary angioplasty.Methods: We analyzed data from 3,646 patients who underwent primary PCI in the Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) studies. We studied the incidence, correlates, and clinical outcomes of 30-day RE-MI.Results: Reinfarction within one month of index hospitalization occurred in 77 (2.1%) of patients. In multivariate analysis, admission Killip class >1 (odds ratio [OR] 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 3.76), left ventricular ejection fraction <50% (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.30 to 4.74), final coronary stenosis >30% (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.28 to 5.15), and presence of coronary dissection (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.36 to 4.24) and thrombus (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.23 to 4.53) on the final angiogram were independent correlates of RE-MI. One-month reinfarction was independently associated with death (OR 7.14, 95% CI 3.28 to 15.5) and ischemic target vessel revascularization (I-TVR) (OR 15.0, 95% CI 8.68 to 26.0) at six months.Conclusions: We conclude that, although early RE-MI is uncommon in patients treated by primary PCI, it is a significant independent predictor of death and I-TVR at six months. Admission Killip class >1 and left ventricular systolic dysfunction were associated with higher incidence of RE-MI. Our results suggest that optimal revascularization during primary PCI may decrease RE-MI rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

: ObjectivesWe sought to identify the incidence, predictors, and clinical consequences of one-month reinfarction (RE-MI) in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).: BackgroundOne-month reinfarction after AMI significantly increases long-term mortality; however, little is known about the incidence and predictors of RE-MI in patients undergoing primary angioplasty.: MethodsWe analyzed data from 3,646 patients who underwent primary PCI in the Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) studies. We studied the incidence, correlates, and clinical outcomes of 30-day RE-MI.: ResultsReinfarction within one month of index hospitalization occurred in 77 (2.1%) of patients. In multivariate analysis, admission Killip class >1 (odds ratio [OR] 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 3.76), left ventricular ejection fraction <50% (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.30 to 4.74), final coronary stenosis >30% (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.28 to 5.15), and presence of coronary dissection (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.36 to 4.24) and thrombus (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.23 to 4.53) on the final angiogram were independent correlates of RE-MI. One-month reinfarction was independently associated with death (OR 7.14, 95% CI 3.28 to 15.5) and ischemic target vessel revascularization (I-TVR) (OR 15.0, 95% CI 8.68 to 26.0) at six months.: ConclusionsWe conclude that, although early RE-MI is uncommon in patients treated by primary PCI, it is a significant independent predictor of death and I-TVR at six months. Admission Killip class >1 and left ventricular systolic dysfunction were associated with higher incidence of RE-MI. Our results suggest that optimal revascularization during primary PCI may decrease RE-MI rates. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: This study was designed to evaluate the safety profile of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (GPI) in octogenarians undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Background: Patients > or =80 years old constitute the fastest growing segment of the U.S. population and have a high prevalence of coronary artery disease. Few data exist regarding the use of GPI during PCI in octogenarians, as these patients have been excluded from randomized clinical trials of GPI.Methods: Consecutive patients > or =80 years old undergoing PCI between January 1998 and June 2001 were evaluated for clinical outcomes and bleeding complications.Results: One thousand three hundred and ninety two of 14,308 patients (9.7%) undergoing PCI were > or =80 years old. Of these, 459 of 1,392 (33%) of the patients were treated with GPI. Octogenarians treated with GPI were more likely to present with acute coronary syndrome or infarction, receive stents, require an intra-aortic balloon pump, or undergo multi-vessel PCI. Glycoprotein receptor inhibitor use was associated with a higher rate of bleeding, but the transfusion rate was similar to that in patients who did not receive GPI (9.8% vs. 8.6%, p = NS). No cases of intracranial hemorrhage were observed. By multivariate analysis, GPI treatment was associated with longer hospitalization but did not independently predict the need for transfusion or affect mortality.Conclusions: Octogenarians have a high incidence of bleeding and need for transfusion after PCI. Although the use of GPI was associated with more access and non-access site bleeding and longer hospital stay, GPI treatment does not significantly increase the risk of transfusion or intracranial hemorrhage in this non-randomized cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

: ObjectivesThis study was designed to evaluate the safety profile of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (GPI) in octogenarians undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).: BackgroundPatients ≥80 years old constitute the fastest growing segment of the U.S. population and have a high prevalence of coronary artery disease. Few data exist regarding the use of GPI during PCI in octogenarians, as these patients have been excluded from randomized clinical trials of GPI.: MethodsConsecutive patients ≥80 years old undergoing PCI between January 1998 and June 2001 were evaluated for clinical outcomes and bleeding complications.: ResultsOne thousand three hundred and ninety two of 14,308 patients (9.7%) undergoing PCI were ≥80 years old. Of these, 459 of 1,392 (33%) of the patients were treated with GPI. Octogenarians treated with GPI were more likely to present with acute coronary syndrome or infarction, receive stents, require an intra-aortic balloon pump, or undergo multi-vessel PCI. Glycoprotein receptor inhibitor use was associated with a higher rate of bleeding, but the transfusion rate was similar to that in patients who did not receive GPI (9.8% vs. 8.6%, p = NS). No cases of intracranial hemorrhage were observed. By multivariate analysis, GPI treatment was associated with longer hospitalization but did not independently predict the need for transfusion or affect mortality.: ConclusionsOctogenarians have a high incidence of bleeding and need for transfusion after PCI. Although the use of GPI was associated with more access and non-access site bleeding and longer hospital stay, GPI treatment does not significantly increase the risk of transfusion or intracranial hemorrhage in this non-randomized cohort. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

: ObjectivesThe Air Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) study was designed to determine the best reperfusion strategy for patients with high-risk acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at hospitals without percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) capability.: BackgroundPrevious studies have suggested that high-risk patients have better outcomes with primary PTCA than with thrombolytic therapy. It is unknown whether this advantage would be lost if the patient had to be transferred for PTCA, and reperfusion was delayed.: MethodsPatients with high-risk AMI (age >70 years, anterior MI, Killip class II/III, heart rate >100 beats/min or systolic BP <100 mm Hg) who were eligible for thrombolytic therapy were randomized to either transfer for primary PTCA or on-site thrombolysis.: ResultsOne hundred thirty-eight patients were randomized before the study ended (71 to transfer for PTCA and 67 to thrombolysis). The time from arrival to treatment was delayed in the transfer group (155 vs. 51 min, p < 0.0001), largely due to the initiation of transfer (43 min) and transport time (26 min). Patients randomized to transfer had a reduced hospital stay (6.1 ± 4.3 vs. 7.5 ± 4.3 days, p = 0.015) and less ischemia (12.7% vs. 31.8%, p = 0.007). At 30 days, a 38% reduction in major adverse cardiac events was observed for the transfer group; however, because of the inability to recruit the necessary sample size, this did not achieve statistical significance (8.4% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.331).: ConclusionsPatients with high-risk AMI at hospitals without a catheterization laboratory may have an improved outcome when transferred for primary PTCA versus on-site thrombolysis; however, this will require further study. The marked delay in the transfer process suggests a role for triaging patients directly to specialized heart-attack centers. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]