Search

Background: Clinical outcomes in large patient populations from real-world clinical practice with a next-generation self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve are lacking.Objectives: This study sought to document the clinical and device performance outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a next-generation, self-expanding transcatheter heart valve (THV) system in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) in routine clinical practice.Methods: The FORWARD (CoreValve Evolut R FORWARD) study is a prospective, single-arm, multinational, multicenter, observational study. An independent clinical events committee adjudicated safety endpoints based on Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definitions. An independent echocardiographic core laboratory evaluated all echocardiograms. From January 2016 to December 2016, TAVR with the next-generation self-expanding THV was attempted in 1,038 patients with symptomatic, severe AS at 53 centers on 4 continents.Results: Mean age was 81.8 ± 6.2 years, 64.9% were women, the mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality was 5.5 ± 4.5%, and 33.9% of patients were deemed frail. The repositioning feature of the THV was applied in 25.8% of patients. A single valve was implanted in the proper anatomic location in 98.9% of patients. The mean aortic valve gradient was 8.5 ± 5.6 mm Hg, and moderate or severe aortic regurgitation was 1.9% at discharge. All-cause mortality was 1.9%, and disabling stroke occurred in 1.8% at 30 days. The expected-to-observed early surgical mortality ratio was 0.35. A pacemaker was implanted in 17.5% of patients.Conclusions: TAVR using the next-generation THV is clinically safe and effective for treating older patients with severe AS at increased operative risk. (CoreValve Evolut R FORWARD Study [FORWARD]; NCT02592369). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The study sought a prospective multicenter nonrandomized evaluation of the Direct Flow Medical (DFM) system for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. Background: The DFM transcatheter aortic valve system is a nonmetallic design with a pressurized support structure that allows precise positioning, retrieval, and assessment of valve performance prior to permanent implantation. Methods: One hundred high surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis were evaluated for the primary endpoint. There were 75 patients in the group evaluable for the secondary endpoints and 25 in the pre-specified roll-in training phase. Echocardiographic and angiographic data were evaluated by an independent core laboratory and adverse events adjudicated by clinical event committee and classified according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) criteria. Results: There was 99% freedom from all cause mortality at 30 days (primary endpoint). VARC criteria defined 30 day combined freedom from patient safety event rate was 91% and overall device success was 93%. The post-implantation echocardiography results demonstrated mild or no aortic regurgitation in 99% (73 of 74) with a mean gradient of 12.6 ± 7.1 mm Hg (n = 72) and effective orifice area of 1.50 ± 0.56 cm2 and New York Heart Association functional class was I or II in 92% of cases. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of the DFM system in surgical high risk patients with severe aortic stenosis and complex anatomy aortic regurgitation was less than moderate in 99% of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study sought to assess the impact of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation on clinical outcomes among patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Background: TAVI is associated with atrioventricular-conduction abnormalities requiring PPM implantation in up to 40% among patients treated with self-expanding prostheses. Methods: Between 2007 and 2010, 353 consecutive patients (mean age: 82.6 ± 6.1 years, log EuroSCORE: 25.0 ± 15.0%) with severe aortic stenosis underwent transfemoral TAVI at 2 institutions. Clinical outcomes were compared among 3 groups: (1) patients requiring PPM implantation after TAVI (PPM after TAVI), (2) patients without PPM before or after TAVI (no PPM), and (3) patients with PPM before TAVI (PPM before TAVI). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 12 months, and an age-, sex-, and origin-matched standardized population served as controls. Results: Of 353 patients, 98 patients (27.8%) belonged to the PPM after TAVI group, 48 patients (13.6%) belonged to the PPM before TAVI group, and 207 patients (58.6%) belonged to the no PPM group. The PPM before TAVI patients had a significantly higher baseline risk compared with the PPM after TAVI and no PPM patients (coronary artery disease: 77.1% vs. 52.7% and 58.2%, respectively, p = 0.009; atrial fibrillation: 43.8% vs. 22.7% and 20.4%, respectively, p = 0.005). At 12 months of follow-up, all-cause mortality was similar in all 3 groups (PPM after TAVI group: 19.4%, PPM before TAVI group: 22.9%, no PPM group: 18.0%) in unadjusted analyses (p = 0.77) and adjusted analyses (p = 0.90). Compared with the standardized population, adjusted hazard ratios for death were 2.37 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.51 to 3.72) for the PPM after TAVI group, 2.75 (95% CI: 1.52 to 4.97) for the PPM before TAVI group, and 2.24 (95% CI: 1.62 to 3.09) for the no PPM group. Conclusions: Although prognosis remains impaired compared with an age-, sex-, and origin-matched standardized population, periprocedural PPM implantation does not seem to affect clinical outcomes adversely among patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, device performance, and clinical outcome up to 2 years for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Background: The role of TAVI in the treatment of calcific aortic stenosis evolves rapidly, but mid- and long-term results are scarce. Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study with symptomatic patients undergoing TAVI for treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis using the 18-F Medtronic CoreValve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) prosthesis. Results: In all, 126 patients (mean age 82 years, 42.9% male, mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score 23.4%) with severe aortic valve stenosis (mean gradient 46.8 mm Hg) underwent the TAVI procedure. Access was transfemoral in all but 2 cases with subclavian access. Retrospective risk stratification classified 54 patients as moderate surgical risk, 51 patients as high-risk operable, and 21 patients as high-risk inoperable. The overall technical success rate was 83.1%. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 15.2%, without significant differences in the subgroups. At 2 years, all-cause mortality was 38.1%, with a significant difference between the moderate-risk group and the combined high-risk groups (27.8% vs. 45.8%, p = 0.04). This difference was mainly attributable to an increased risk of noncardiac mortality among patients constituting the high-risk groups. Hemodynamic results remained unchanged during follow-up (mean gradient: 8.5 ± 2.5 mm Hg at 30 days and 9.0 ± 3.4 mm Hg at 2 years). Functional class improved in 80% of patients and remained stable over time. There was no incidence of structural valve deterioration. Conclusions: The TAVI procedure provides sustained clinical and hemodynamic benefits for as long as 2 years for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at increased risk for surgery. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]