Search

A bidirectional relationship is known between increased sympathetic activity inducing insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia producing sympathetic overactivity, resulting in a vicious circle [(1)][1]. Thus, it seems likely that renal denervation (RDN), introduced as an interventional approach for

ObjectivesThis study sought to investigate the effect of renal denervation (RDN) in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension according to the established definition (Joint National Committee VII and European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology guidelines), that is, office blood pressure (BP) ≥140/90 mm Hg (with at least three antihypertensive drugs, including a diuretic, in adequate doses) and confirmed by 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM).BackgroundRDN emerged as an innovative interventional antihypertensive therapy. However, so far, only patients with severe hypertension (systolic BP ≥160 mm Hg or ≥150 mm Hg for patients with type 2 diabetes) have been investigated.MethodsIn this study, there were 54 patients with moderate treatment-resistant hypertension (office BP ≥140/90 mm Hg and

The primary objective of this study was the effect of renal denervation (RDN) on elevated urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) in treatment-resistant hypertensive patients. In addition, patients were stratified according their UACR at baseline into micro- (30-300 mg/g, n=37) and macroalbuminuria (≥ 300 mg/g,2,200 mg/g, n=22).Increased albuminuria indicates cardiovascular and renal damage in hypertension. RDN emerged as an innovative interventional approach to reduce blood pressure (BP) and may thus reduce albumin urinary excretion.Fifty-nine treatment-resistant hypertensive patients with elevated UACR at baseline underwent catheter-based RDN using the Symplicity Flex™ catheter (Medtronic Inc., Santa Rosa, CA).In the whole and pre-specified subgroups both office and 24-h ambulatory BP were significantly reduced 6 months after RDN. In parallel, a significant reduction in UACR occurred in all patients (160 (65-496) versus 89 (29-319) mg/g creatinine, p0.001) and in both subgroups (microalbuminuria: 83 (49-153) versus 58 (17-113) mg/g creatinine, p=0.001; macroalbuminuria: (536 (434-1483) versus 478 (109-1080) mg/g creatinine, p0.001). In accordance, the prevalence of micro- and macroalbuminuria decreased significantly. Regression analysis revealed a modest positive relationship between the decrease of UACR and the fall of systolic BP (β=0.340, p=0.039) independent of renal function. Renal function remained unchanged after RDN.In summary, following RDN, the magnitude of albuminuria as well as the prevalence of micro- and macroalbuminuria decreased in treatment-resistant hypertensive patients. Since albuminuria is an independent renal and cardiovascular risk factor, our findings suggest a reduction of renal and cardiovascular risk in these patients.