Search

Background Stem cell–based therapy has emerged as a potential therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Although various approaches have been studied, intracoronary injection of bone marrow autologous mononuclear cells (BMMC) and the ability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize endogenous cells have attracted the most attention. Objectives This study compares, for the first time, the efficacy of BMMC injection, G-CSF mobilization, and the combination of both with standard treatment. Methods On Day 1 after primary percutaneous coronary intervention, 120 patients were randomized to a 1) intracoronary BMMC injection; 2) mobilization with G-CSF; 3) both (BMMC injection plus G-CSF); or 4) conventional treatment (control group). G-CSF, 10 μg/kg/day subcutaneously, was started Day 1 and maintained for 5 days. BMMC injection was performed on Days 3 to 5. Our primary endpoint was absolute change in 12-month left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) relative to baseline measured by cardiac magnetic resonance. Results The mean change in LVEF between baseline and follow-up for all patients was 4 ± 6% (p = 0.006). Change in LVEF and LVESV over time did not differ significantly among the 4 groups. Patients actively treated with any stem cell approach showed similar changes in LVEF and LVESV versus control subjects, with a small but significant reduction in infarct area (p = 0.038). Conclusions In our study, 3 different bone marrow–derived stem cell approaches in AMI did not result in improvement of LVEF or volumes compared with standard AMI care (Trial of Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Acute Myocardial Infarction [TECAM]; NCT00984178 )

Background Intraventricular fluid dynamics can be assessed clinically using imaging. The contribution of vortex structures to left ventricular (LV) diastolic function has never been quantified in vivo. Objectives This study sought to understand the impact of intraventricular flow patterns on filling and to assess whether impaired fluid dynamics may be a source of diastolic dysfunction. Methods Two-dimensional flow velocity fields from color Doppler echocardiographic sequences were obtained in 20 patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM), 20 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and 20 control healthy volunteers. Using a flow decomposition method, we isolated the rotational velocity generated by the vortex ring from the surrounding flow in the left ventricle. Results The vortex was responsible for entering 13 ± 6% of filling volume in the control group and 19 ± 8% in the NIDCM group (p = 0.004), but only 5 ± 5% in the HCM group (p Conclusions The diastolic vortex is responsible for entering a significant fraction of LV filling volume at no energetic or pressure cost. Thus, intraventricular fluid mechanics are an important determinant of global chamber LV operative stiffness. Reduced stiffness in NIDCM is partially related to enhanced vorticity. Conversely, impaired vortex generation is an unreported mechanism of diastolic dysfunction in HCM and probably other causes of concentric remodeling.

Stem cell-based therapy has emerged as a potential therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Although various approaches have been studied, intracoronary injection of bone marrow autologous mononuclear cells (BMMC) and the ability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize endogenous cells have attracted the most attention.This study compares, for the first time, the efficacy of BMMC injection, G-CSF mobilization, and the combination of both with standard treatment.On Day 1 after primary percutaneous coronary intervention, 120 patients were randomized to a 1) intracoronary BMMC injection; 2) mobilization with G-CSF; 3) both (BMMC injection plus G-CSF); or 4) conventional treatment (control group). G-CSF, 10 μg/kg/day subcutaneously, was started Day 1 and maintained for 5 days. BMMC injection was performed on Days 3 to 5. Our primary endpoint was absolute change in 12-month left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) relative to baseline measured by cardiac magnetic resonance.The mean change in LVEF between baseline and follow-up for all patients was 4 ± 6% (p = 0.006). Change in LVEF and LVESV over time did not differ significantly among the 4 groups. Patients actively treated with any stem cell approach showed similar changes in LVEF and LVESV versus control subjects, with a small but significant reduction in infarct area (p = 0.038).In our study, 3 different bone marrow-derived stem cell approaches in AMI did not result in improvement of LVEF or volumes compared with standard AMI care (Trial of Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Acute Myocardial Infarction [TECAM]; NCT00984178).

We read with great interest the letter by Pedrizzetti and colleagues Because our study [(1)][1] has raised some concerns among these investigators, here we are pleased to reassure the readers of JACC about the validity of our findings. The impact of a vortex on the intraventricular flow is

The systemic arterial load modulates the clinical impact of aortic stenosis (AS). The hemodynamic response to exercise has never been measured invasively in patients with low-gradient (LG) AS and normal ejection fraction. Twenty patients (77 ± 6 years old; 17 female) with LGAS (mean pressure

The current best treatment option for patients with end-stage heart failure is allograft heart transplantation, which is limited by donor source and immunorejection. Generating an autologous bioartificial heart could overcome these. Here we demonstrate perfusion decellularization of human whole

The pharmacoinvasive strategy is ideal for ST elevation myocardial infarction patients (STEMI pts) arriving at hospitals unable to offer timely primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The optimal timing of coronary angiography (angio) after fibrinolysis and its impact on clinical outcomes