1. Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Predicts Outcomes in Patients With Prior Surgical Revascularization
- Author
-
Andreas Seraphim, Benjamin Dowsing, Krishnaraj S. Rathod, Hunain Shiwani, Kush Patel, Kristopher D. Knott, Sameer Zaman, Ieuan Johns, Yousuf Razvi, Rishi Patel, Hui Xue, Daniel A. Jones, Marianna Fontana, Graham Cole, Rakesh Uppal, Rhodri Davies, James C. Moon, Peter Kellman, and Charlotte Manisty
- Subjects
Male ,Perfusion ,Infarction ,Ischemia ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Coronary Circulation ,Myocardial Perfusion Imaging ,Humans ,Female ,Coronary Artery Disease ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies - Abstract
Patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery typically have complex coronary disease and remain at high risk of adverse events. Quantitative myocardial perfusion indices predict outcomes in native vessel disease, but their prognostic performance in patients with prior CABG is unknown.In this study, we sought to evaluate whether global stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and perfusion reserve (MPR) derived from perfusion mapping cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) independently predict adverse outcomes in patients with prior CABG.This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with prior CABG referred for adenosine stress perfusion CMR. Perfusion mapping was performed in-line with automated quantification of MBF. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events defined as nonfatal myocardial infarction and unplanned revascularization. Associations were evaluated with the use of Cox proportional hazards models after adjusting for comorbidities and CMR parameters.A total of 341 patients (median age 67 years, 86% male) were included. Over a median follow-up of 638 days (IQR: 367-976 days), 81 patients (24%) reached the primary outcome. Both stress MBF and MPR independently predicted outcomes after adjusting for known prognostic factors (regional ischemia, infarction). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for 1 mL/g/min of decrease in stress MBF was 2.56 (95% CI: 1.45-4.35) and for 1 unit of decrease in MPR was 1.61 (95% CI: 1.08-2.38).Global stress MBF and MPR derived from perfusion CMR independently predict adverse outcomes in patients with previous CABG. This effect is independent from the presence of regional ischemia on visual assessment and the extent of previous infarction.
- Published
- 2022