The reaction between arsenite and iodate at 25 "C and pH 2.25 in a stirred tank reactor exhibits bistability over a range of flow rates and input arsenite and iodate concentrations. Observed steady-state Iand I2 concentrations and points of transition between bistable and unistable behavior are in excellent agreement with values calculated from a simple model consisting of three overall component processes: (A) IO3+ 3HSAs0, = I+ 3H3As04; (B) 10; + 51+ 6H' = 312 + 3H20; (C) I2 + H3As03 + H 2 0 = 21+ H,As04 + 2H+. Implications for the recently discovered arsenite-iodate-chlorite-oscillating reaction are discussed. Studies of oscillating chemical reactions and related phenomena are of fundamental and rapidly increasing interest both because of the light they shed on the complexities of dynamic behavior possible for systems far from equilibrium and because they may provide experimentally tractable models for some of the endogenous rhythms observed in living systems. The ability of chemists to develop and test general theories of chemical oscillation has been hindered somewhat by the paucity of examples. In spite of intensive efforts in the last decade to design new oscillators, only two fundamentally different nonbiological, homogeneous oscillating reactions, the Bray-Liebhafsky3 (B-L) and the Belousov-Zhabotinsky4 (B-Z) systems, have been characterized. The array of known oscillators has been augmented by variations and hybrids of the above two reactions, as well as by systems of biological origin. Since oscillations in the B-L and B-Z systems were discovered serendipitously, it seems fair to summarize the techniques by which chemical oscillators have been found as (a) accident (the B-L and B-Z reactions), (b) variation on a theme (the uncatalyzed B-Z r e a c t i ~ n , ~ the Briggs-Rauscher reaction6), and (c) study of biological systems (glycolysis'). From the point of view of formulating general approaches to chemical oscillation, technique a is too unreliable, while b is unlikely to yield a sufficient variety of behavior, and the systems of type c tend to be both highly complex and difficult to monitor. Although no necessary and sufficient set of conditions for the existence of chemical oscillations has been established, several factors are known to be either essential or helpful in producing oscillatory behavior. For example, oscillating chemical systems must be far from equilibrium and must contain an appropriate nonlinear coupling mechanism, the most common example of which is autocatalysis.8 It would seem that even such a rudimentary understanding as this might make it possible to construct systematically new chemical oscillators by combining known reactions under appropriate conditions. In a recent communication (part 2l), we proposed a systematic approach to the design of chemical oscillators and applied it successfully to generate a new homogeneous oscillating reaction involving arsenite, iodate, and chlorite. This system has since been found to be the prototype of a family of chemical oscillators involving iodate, chlorite, and a reducing agent which produces iodide from iodate and/or from iodine at a suitable rate.9 The approach used to generate these new oscillators starts with an autocatalytic reaction in a continuous-flow stirred tank reactor (CSTR). The autocatalysis constitutes the destabilizing nonlinear coupling mechanism, while the CSTR guarantees that the system is maintained far from equilibrium. We then make use of a simple dynamical model developed by Boissonade and De Kepper," which suggests that oscillations can result from the application of an appropriate feedback step to an intrinsically bistable system. The next step in the search for oscillation is to seek a reaction which Centre de Recherche Paul Pascal, Domaine Universitaire, 33405 Talence Cedex. France. 0002-7863/8 1/1503-6121$01.25/0 perturbs the stability of the two stable branches on a suitable time scale so as to generate oscillation. The approach outlined above has a t least two virtues. The model is sufficiently simple and general that, unlike more detailed models of chemical ~ s c i l l a t i o n , ' ~ ~ ~ it can be applied directly to a wide range of reactions. Secondly, it splits the task of finding new oscillating systems into two more tractable subproblems, the discovery of bistable systems and the design of suitable feedback reactions. In this paper we report a series of experiments on the behavior of acidic mixtures of arsenite and iodate in a CSTR. The system exhibits bistability over a significant range of input concentrations and flow rates. Similar results have also been obtained by Papsin et al.14 We show here that calculations with a simple model consisting of three overall reaction steps yield results in excellent agreement with our experiments. In further papers we shall present studies of other bistable systems as well as of the detailed coupling of the arsenite-iodate reaction with the chlorite-iodide system to generate oscillation. Experimental Section The apparatus consists of a thermally regulated stirred tank glass (Pyrex) flow reactorI5 connected to a Sage Model 375A peristaltic pump which allows for one to four independent input flows. The constraints or variables controlled by the experimenter in this system are the temperature, which was maintained at 25.0 f 0.1 "C in this series of experiments, the residence time T , and the concentrations [Ailo that each input species A, would attain in the tank if no reaction took place. Measurements were made of the potential of an Orion iodide-specific electrode with respect to a mercury-mercurous sulfate reference electrode and of the absorbance at 460 nm, the wavelength of maximum absorbance of 12. Iodine concentrations are calculated by assuming that I2 is the only species which absorbs significantly at this wavelength. When nonnegligible concentrations of iodide ion are present, accurate [I21 values (1) Part 3 in the series Systematic Design of Chemical Oscillators. Part 2: De Kepper, P.; Epstein, I . R.; Kustin, K. J . Am. Chem. SOC. 1981, 103, 2133-2134. Part 1: Epstein, I. R.; Kustin, K.; Warshaw, L. Ibid. 1980 102, 3751-3798. (2) To whom correspondence should be addressed. (3) Bray, W. C. J . Am. Chem. SOC. 1921, 43, 1262-1267. (4) Belousov, B. P. Sb. ReJ Radiat. Med. 1959, 1958, 145. (5) Orbin, M.; Koros, E. J . Phys. Chem. 1978, 82, 1672-1674. (6) Briggs, T. S.; Rauscher, W. C. J . Chem. Educ. 1973, 50, 496. (7) Boiteux, A,; Hess, B. Symp. Faraday SOC. 1975, No. 9 , 202-214. (8) Franck, U. F. Symp. Faraday SOC. 1975, No. 9 , 137-149. (9) OrbPn, M.; De Kepper, P.; Epstein, I. R.; Kustin, K. Nature (London), (10) Boissonade, J.; De Kepper, P. J . Phys. Chem. 1980, 84, 501-506. (11) Prigogine, I.; Lefever, R. J . Chem. Phys. 1968, 48, 1695-1700. (12) Field, R. J.;Noyes, R. M. J . Am. Chem. SOC. 1974,60, 1877-1884. (1 3) Pacault, A,; Hanusse, P.; De Kepper, P.; Vidal, C.; Boissonade, J. Acc. (14) Papsin, G.; Hanna, A,; Showalter, K. J . Phys. Chem., in press. (15) Pacault, A.; De Kepper, P.; Hanusse, P.; Rossi, A. C. R . Hebd. in press. Chem. Res. 1976, 9, 438-445. Seances Acad. Sci., Ser. C 1975, 281, 215-220.