Search

Mobile phones have become very commonly used worldwide within a short period of time. To date there is only limited knowledge about interaction between electromagnetic fields (EMFs) emitted by mobile phones and the auditory function. Moreover, there is widespread concern that there may be potential for harm. The aim of this study was to assess potential subtle changes in cochlear function by measuring the temporal and spectral fine structure of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) in normal hearing subjects after exposure to EMFs emitted by Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM) mobile phones. TEOAEs were recorded in 27 healthy young adults before and after 10 min of real or sham exposure in a double-blind design. TEOAE data were analyzed both globally (broadband analysis) and using the Wavelet Transform (analysis of the time-frequency fine structure). The broadband analysis revealed no significant effect on TEOAEs related to exposure, confirming results of previous studies; in addition, no significant change was detected in the analysis of the elementary wavelet components, suggesting that the temporal and spectral fine structure of TEOAEs is not affected by 10 min exposure to low-intensity EMFs emitted by GSM mobile phones.

The 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) is considered to consist of two components in normally hearing ears, one having constant phase with changing DP frequency (wave fixed) and one having an increasing phase lag with increasing frequency (place fixed). The aim was to identify the wave-fixed and place-fixed components of both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 DPs, and, in particular, to show whether a wave-fixed 2f2-f1 DP exists in normally hearing adults. DPOAE recordings were made in 20 ears of normally hearing young adults. Four frequency ratios were used and recording entailed fixed frequency-ratio sweeps. A separation into wave-fixed and place-fixed components was carried out using a time-window separation method. A method for estimating the noise floor after data processing was developed. Results confirmed the presence of wave-fixed and place-fixed components for 2f1-f2, consistent with previous studies. Both components were also present for 2f2-f1 in virtually all subjects. This latter finding conflicts with current models of DPOAE generation, and so a modified model is proposed. Unlike the 2f1-f2 emission, which has a wave-fixed component that is strongly dependent on the frequency ratio, neither component of the 2f2-f1 emission showed such a dependence. The proposed model explains these findings in terms of the overlap of the primary frequency traveling waves.

Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions from the human ear are typically several orders of magnitude smaller than the stimuli that elicit them--a measurement technique that attempts to cancel the stimulus signal from the recorded waveform is therefore typically employed. In practice, an imperfect cancellation of the stimulus is achieved, leaving a "stimulus artifact" that obscures the early part of the emission. Input-output nonlinearities of the transducers used in recording emissions are acknowledged as one source of the stimulus artifact. Here an additional source of this artifact, related to hysteresis in the magnetic "receivers" (loudspeakers) used in such recordings, is identified and discussed.

A model for estimating the spectral period of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) is presented. The model characterizes the frequency spectrum of an SFOAE in terms of four parameters which can be directly related to cochlear mechanical quantities featuring in the theory of SFOAE generation proposed by Zweig and Shera [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 2018-2047 (1995)]. The results of applying the parametric model to SFOAEs generated by cochlear models suggest that it gives a sensitive measure of spectral period. It is concluded that the parametric model may be a useful tool for detecting small changes in cochlear function using SFOAE measurements.

The distributed roughness theory of the origins of spectral periodicity in stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) predicts that the spectral period will be altered by suppression of the traveling wave (TW) [Zweig and Shera, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 2018-2047 (1995)]. In order to investigate this effect in more detail, simulations of the variation of the spectral period under conditions of self-suppression and two-tone suppression are obtained from nonlinear cochlear models based on this theory. The results show that during self-suppression the spectral period is increased, while during high-side two-tone suppression, the period is reduced, indicating that the detailed pattern of disruption of the cochlear amplifier must be examined if the nonlinear behavior of SFOAEs is to be understood. The model results suggest that the SFOAE spectral period may be sensitive to changes in the state of the cochlear amplifier. A companion paper [Lineton and Lutman, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 871-882 (2003)] presents experimental data which are compared with the results of the above models with a view to testing the underlying theory of Zweig and Shera.

In a companion paper [Lineton and Lutman, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 859-870 (2003)], changes in the spectral period of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) during self-suppression and two-tone suppression were simulated using a nonlinear cochlear model based on the distributed roughness theory of otoacoustic emission generation [Zweig and Shera, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 2018-2047 (1995)1. The current paper presents the results of an experimental investigation of SFOAE suppression obtained from 20 human subjects. It was found that, in most subjects, the spectral period increased during self-suppression, but reduced during high-side two-tone suppression. This pattern of results is in close agreement with the predictions of the cochlear model, and therefore strongly supports the distributed roughness theory of Zweig and Shera. In addition, the results suggest that the SFOAE spectral period is sensitive to changes in the state of the cochlear amplifier.

A systematic improvement in auditory performance over time, following a change in the acoustic information available to the listener (that cannot be attributed to task, procedural or training effects) is known as auditory acclimatization. However, there is conflicting evidence concerning the existence of auditory acclimatization; some studies show an improvement in performance over time while other studies show no change. In an attempt to resolve this conflict, speech recognition abilities of 16 subjects with bilateral sensorineural hearing impairments were measured over a 12-week period following provision of a monaural hearing instrument for the first time. The not-fitted ear was used as the control. Three presentation levels were used representing quiet, normal, and raised speech. The results confirm the presence of acclimatization. In addition, the results show that acclimatization is evident at the higher presentation levels but not at the lowest.

The middle latency response (MLR) may be used as an indicator of anesthetic depth but has been criticized due to its long acquisition time. This study explores methods for optimizing recording of the MLR to maximize signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and hence reduce acquisition time. The first experiment investigates the effects of increasing stimulation rate beyond conventional values and also using higher rates by means of maximum length sequences (MLS). The second experiment compares the use of click and chirp stimuli to elicit the MLR, both at conventional and MLS stimulation rates. For all conditions total recording duration is fixed at 185 s and stimulation level is fixed at 60 dB SL. It was found that SNR increases progressively with rate using conventional click stimulation until the theoretical rate limit is reached at the reciprocal of the response duration. The SNR improvement is equivalent to increasing test speed by a factor of 3. Using MLS stimulation, the SNR increases further until a maximum is reached at a rate of 167 clicks/s, equivalent to a fivefold test speed improvement relative to a conventional recording at 5 clicks/s. The use of chirp stimuli designed to compensate for the frequency dependent cochlear traveling wave delay produces an increase in wave V-Na amplitude at all recording rates. For the later latency waves of the response an increase in amplitude is seen for MLS, but not for conventional chirp trains. The optimum SNR was obtained using chirp stimuli at a MLS rate of 167 opportunities/s. It is concluded that the combination of chirps and MLS can reduce acquisition time to less than one-tenth of that required for conventional stimulation at 5 clicks/s for the same SNR. This would confer material benefits for estimating anesthetic depth using MLR.

Maximum length sequences (MLS) have been used to improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of otoacoustic emissions [Thornton, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94, 132-136 (1993)] and the auditory brainstem response [Thornton and Slaven, Br. J. Audiol. 27, 205-210 (1993)]. By implication, a shorter recording time would be required to give equal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). This study aimed to establish whether it is also possible to improve the SNR of the auditory-evoked potential termed the middle latency response (MLR) using maximum length sequences (MLS). Recordings of 180 s each were made using a conventional recording rate and MLS rates of 42, 89, and 185 clicks/s. Three different stimulus intensities were used in the range 30 to 70 dB nHL. The rate of 89 clicks/s was found to produce most improvement in SNR for both the Na-Pa region of the MLR and the Na-Pb region. This improvement in SNR using MLS implies that an MLS rate of 89 clicks/s would produce a fourfold reduction in recording time for equal SNR over conventional recording for the Pa-Nb region of the MLR at a stimulus intensity of 70 dB nHL. The latency of the Nb wave was found to reduce significantly using MLS. An MLR could not be recorded from every subject in this study, but more subjects had an identifiable response for MLS than for conventional recordings. Use of MLS to record the MLR appears to offer the potential for reduction in test time and better wave identification.

Transiently evolked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) have been reported in several studies as absent in a small minority of normal ears. Other studies have reported TEOAEs in all normal ears. Differences between studies may arise directly from criteria for TEOAE identification, criteria for selection of normals, or statistically due to limited sample sizes. In order to understand and model cochlear processes involved in TEOAE generation, it needs to be known whether the presence of normal hearing leads automatically to generation of TEOAEs. The present study set out to establish in a large sample if any ears could be found that lacked TEOAEs despite normal hearing threshold levels (HTL). A total of 397 ears from highly cooperative adult subjects were examined under laboratory conditions. Using cross correlation between replicate nonlinear waveforms as the criterion, TEOAEs were present in 99.2% of the sample (lower CI 98.1%). However, careful visual assessment of the recorded waveforms for the remaining ears did not unequivocally show absence of TEOAE characteristics in any ear with normal HTLs. While TEOAE strength varies widely among ears, no clear evidence was found to show that TEOAEs can be absent when HTLs are normal.

Evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAE) are a sensitive indicator of subtle cochlear damage and hence might explain why some people complain of excessive difficulty understanding speech in a background of noise, despite having normal hearing thresholds. This phenomenon has been termed "Obscure Auditory Dysfunction" (OAD). Recorded EOAE waveforms from a group of 50 OAD patients were compared with those from a group of 50 matched controls. No significant difference could be found between the two groups across a range of objective and subjective descriptors of the EOAEs. Any cochlear component of OAD does not appear to affect the function of the outer hair cells sufficiently to modify EOAEs materially.

Frequency resolution ability was measured using a psychoacoustical tuning curve (PTC) or a notch-noise technique in two population samples. The first sample incorporated 1764 subjects with various degrees of sensorineural hearing impairment and ranging in age from 17-80 years. The second sample included 240 subjects aged between 50 and 75 years, carefully balanced in terms of impairment and age to avoid confounding between these two variables. In both samples, frequency resolution ability declined with increasing hearing threshold level (HTL), as measured by either method. In a subsample tested with both methods, the correlation between the two was only modest. After accounting for HTL, there was a minor dependence of frequency resolution on age, older subjects having poorer frequency resolution once HTL had been accounted for. No addition to the explained variance was achieved by taking sex, occupational group, or audiogram slope into account. Despite the documented reproducibility of the measures, much of the variance in the frequency resolution measurements remained unrelated to HTL or age.

Word identification in noise was measured adaptively under flat and rising frequency response conditions to represent basic alternatives for a hearing-aid characteristic. The speech test results were compared with measures of sensitivity, loudness tolerance, frequency resolution, and temporal resolution in 23 hearing-aid users with mild or moderate sensorineural hearing losses. Subjects also rated the two frequency responses for preference and subjective quality. A paradoxical relationship was found whereby superior speech performance under the flat condition was associated with preference for the rising condition, and vice versa. No combinations of psychoacoustic variables satisfactorily explained either relative performance or preference, although high-frequency sensitivity and upward spread of masking were implicated. Absolute speech performance was related to sensitivity at 2 kHz, age, and sex, but not to frequency resolution once other factors were partialed. Temporal resolution was also a factor, but this was due largely to the influence of extreme values in two subjects. It is concluded that, for moderate degrees of hearing loss, speech identification in noise can be predicted from age, sex, and sensitivity with little advantage from recourse to measurement of frequency or temporal resolution.