Search

We developed a telemedicine system for remote guidance of emergency airway management called the Tele-Airway Management System (TAMS). In a pilot study we examined the usefulness of the TAMS for intubations of actual patients in a hospital emergency department. Twenty-five patients were allocated randomly either to a TAMS group or to an on-scene directed (OSD) group. A total of 12 were intubated using the TAMS. The mean time to intubation (TAMS 62 s vs. OSD 56 s) and the success rate was not different between the two groups (P . 0.05). There were two oesophageal intubations in theTAMS group and four in the OSD group, but this was not significantly different (P ¼ 0.36). There were no mechanical or technical errors such as disconnection during use of the TAMS. The pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of the TAMS as an alternative to OSD. However, a larger study will be required to determine non-superiority or equivalence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We tested three imaging devices for suitability in emergency dental situations for telemedicine. The three devices were a special-purpose oral camera, a digital single lens reflex (DSLR) camera, and the built-in camera of a mobile phone. A total of 20 subjects volunteered to take part in the study. We simulated five different conditions which could affect the quality of the image and measured image transmission times across two widely available mobile networks (a CDMA-based 3G network and a Wireless Broadband Network, WiBRO). The DSLR produced the best quality images, although it was a relatively large device and not easy to use. The oral camera failed to give satisfactory images under certain conditions (i.e. without extra lighting, out of focus and head motion). In contrast, the mobile phone based camera was very easy to use and to handle, and it gave good information for initial diagnosis, even at high compression ratios. If the image acquisition conditions are carefully set up, this device might be the best for emergency dental trauma situations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We developed a Tele-Airway Management System (TAMS) which contained two high quality videocameras which were set up to view the frontal and lateral parts of the patient. Another endoscopic camera, a videolaryngoscope, was used to view the anatomy of the airway. One patient monitor was used to view the vital signs and there was also a PC terminal. A study was conducted in two separate emergency departments with 33 novice intubators (medical students and interns of the department). Remote consultation was provided by a board certified emergency physician. The time taken to complete endotracheal intubation for the TAMS group was 82.1 s (SE 4.9) and was 103.8 s (SE 7.9) in the videolaryngoscope-only group. The difference was significant (P = 0.03). The success rate of endotracheal intubation within 2 min was 94% for the TAMS group and 63% in the videolaryngoscope-only group (P = 0.04). With a wireless communication system, the TAMS could be installed in an ambulance, which might allow paramedics to perform safe and effective airway management in the field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A Web-based, realtime, tele-ultrasound consultation system was designed. The system employed ActiveX control, MPEG-4 coding of full-resolution ultrasound video (640 × 480 pixels at 30 frames/s) and H.320 videoconferencing. It could be used via a Web browser. The system was evaluated over three types of commercial line: a cable connection, ADSL and VDSL. Three radiologists assessed the quality of compressed and uncompressed ultrasound video-sequences from 16 cases (10 abnormal livers, four abnormal kidneys and two abnormal gallbladders). The radiologists' scores showed that, at a given frame rate, increasing the bit rate was associated with increasing quality; however, at a certain threshold bit rate the quality did not increase significantly. The peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) was also measured between the compressed and uncompressed images. In most cases, the PSNR increased as the bit rate increased, and increased as the number of dropped frames increased. There was a threshold bit rate, at a given frame rate, at which the PSNR did not improve significantly. Taking into account both sets of threshold values, a bit rate of more than 0.6 Mbit/s, at 30 frames/s, is suggested as the threshold for the maintenance of diagnostic image quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Video-encoders in telemedicine systems need to adjust their coding methods for operation on heterogeneous networks on which bandwidth fluctuates. We evaluated MPEG-4 compressed video-pictures of three trauma patients. We compared the original video-frames with compressed video-frames in terms of the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). In a qualitative evaluation, three emergency specialists scored the quality of the video-images blind, on a five-point scale (1= bad to 5 = excellent). The PSNR increased as the bit rate increased from 0.2 to 6 Mbit/s. When the bit rate was fixed, in other words at a given network bandwidth, a higher PSNR was obtained at the expense of spatial resolution and frame rate. The video quality was highly affected by the amount of camera shake. Emergency telemedicine systems require a high bit rate, high spatial resolution and a high frame rate to achieve optimum video quality. However, if the bandwidth is limited (i.e. the bit rate is fixed), temporal resolution becomes more important than spatial resolution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two different prototype mobile telemedicine systems were constructed for use in the emergency room. They could transmit physiological signals as well as video pictures and sound. One device, the mobile emergency bed (MEB), was powered by battery and had a wireless connection to the local-area network (LAN). For the other, the mobile emergency server (MES), a patient monitor, video-camera and microphone were connected by a radio-frequency link to a server. A functional evaluation and a clinical evaluation (by 12 emergency doctors in six emergency centres) were performed on both prototypes. The bandwidth and the video quality of the MEB were better than those of the MES, because of the digital transmission of the wireless LAN. The MES was better for directing patient treatment and teleconsultation; the MEB was better for static patients in the emergency centre. In general, the MES was more suitable for practical emergency telemedicine work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]