Search

The Joint Commission has established medication reconciliation as a National Patient Safety Goal, but it has not been studied much in trauma even though it is integral to safe patient care. This article reviews the existing medication reconciliation strategies and their applicability to the trauma setting. To perform medication reconciliation, hospitals use a variety of strategies including pharmacists or pharmacy technicians, electronic medical record tools, and patient-centered strategies. All of these strategies are limited in trauma. Subpopulations such as injured children, the elderly, and those with brain trauma are particularly challenging and are at risk for suboptimal care from inaccurate medication reconciliation. Further research is necessary to create a safe and efficient system for trauma patients.

The purpose of this study was to determine if anemia in isolated head trauma patients results in a higher mortality rate that would justify a more liberal use of blood transfusions.A retrospective review of isolated blunt head trauma patients was performed between January 2001 and December 2006. Comparisons were made between survivors and nonsurvivors regarding demographics, laboratory values, transfusions received, and lengths of stay.There were 788 patients with 735 survivors who were significantly younger (46.3 y +/- 21.5 survivors versus 68.9 y +/- 18.8 nonsurvivors, P0.0001) and less injured [(ISS: 14.7 +/- 5.2 survivors versus 23.2 +/- 4.7 nonsurvivors, P0.0001), (head abbreviated injury severity: 3.7 +/- 0.7 survivors versus 4.7 +/- 0.5 nonsurvivors, P0.0001)] than those who died (n = 53). The survivors also had shorter lengths of stay (days) [(ICU: 2.4 +/- 4.2 versus 5.6 +/- 11.7, P = 0.03), (hospital: 6.3 +/- 9.8 versus 7.8 +/- 14.8, P = 0.02)]. Multivariate logistic regression showed age (OR 1.063, CI 1.042-1.084), ISS (OR 1.376, CI 1.270-1.491), minimum hemoglobin (OR 0.855, CI 0.732-1.000), and total blood products transfused (OR 1.073, CI 1.008-1.142) to be independent predictors of mortality with an ROC of 0.942. Outcome was independent of the operative procedures, hematocrit and packed red blood cells transfused at 24, 48, and 72 h. Hemoglobin levels of8 mg/dL were more predictive of death than8 mg/dL (P = 0.01).This study supports the need to balance mild anemia with judicious blood product use in the head trauma patient. Given the risk with blood product use, each transfusion should be carefully considered and the patient re-evaluated regularly to determine the need for further intervention.

Background The objective of this study was to determine the utility of a lateral cervical spine plain film in the evaluation of blunt trauma patients. Methods We prospectively evaluated blunt trauma patients from February 2004 to September 2006 who had both a lateral cervical spine (LCS) film and a computed tomography of the cervical spine (CTC), comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the LCS to the CTC. Results There were 1004 patients who met inclusion criteria. Eighty-four patients had a cervical spine fracture while 920 patients had no fracture on CTC. Of the 84 patients with fractures by CTC, 68 had a negative or incomplete LCS. Of the 920 negative CTC, there were 7 false positive LCSs. LCS compared with CTC showed a sensitivity of 19% (16/84) and positive predictive value of 69.6% (16/23). Of the 981 negative or incomplete LCS films, 96.9% were incomplete (951/981). Of the seven patients with a false positive LCS (negative CTC), none was subsequently found to have a cervical spine fracture on further evaluation. Elimination of the LCS would result in charge savings of $265,056.00 (LCS charges with interpretation, $264 each) and increase patient safety by eliminating error. Conclusions LCS has no value as a screening tool in the blunt trauma patient since most are either inaccurate or incomplete. It should be eliminated from the Advanced Trauma Life Support algorithm, and CTC should receive emphasis as the diagnostic gold standard.