Search

Background and Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1(GS) chemotherapy for pancreatic carcinoma patients, stratified by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) preoperative resectability definition. Methods A total of 141 consecutive patients with resected pancreatic carcinoma who received adjuvant GS chemotherapy were evaluated retrospectively. According to the NCCN preoperative resectability definition, tumors were divided into resectable tumors (R group), borderline resectable tumors with portal vein contact (BR-PV group), and borderline resectable tumors with arterial contact (BR-A group). Overall survival and prognostic factors were analyzed. Results Overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates for the 141 patients were 89.6%, 69.9%, and 41.1%, respectively. Overall survival of the R group was significantly better than that of the BR-PV group and the BR-A group (P

Background and objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of postoperative complications after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) stratified by resectability status. Methods Medical records of 226 patients with pancreatic head carcinoma who underwent PD, including 115 with resectable (R) and 111 with borderline resectable/unresectable (BR/UR) PDAC, were reviewed retrospectively. Major complications were defined as grade III or IV based on the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The prognostic impact of major complications on overall survival (OS) was analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses with stratification by resectability status. Results A multivariate analysis in the BR/UR group identified R1 resection (P = 0.03), T 3/4 stage (P = 0.03), and incidence of major complications (P = 0.03) as independent risk factors for poor survival, whereas major complications did not affect survival in the R group. Initiation of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy occurred significantly less frequently for patients with major complications than for those without major complications in the BR/UR group (P = 0.02). Conclusion A negative prognostic impact of postoperative major complications after PD was observed in patients with BR/UR PDAC, whereas the prognostic impact was unclear in patients with R PDAC.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) on long‐term survival in patients with pancreatic head carcinoma after surgical resection. Methods: Medical records of 160 patients with pancreatic head carcinoma who underwent surgical resection were reviewed retrospectively. Clinicopathological parameters including long‐term survival were compared between patients who did and did not undergo PBD. Results: Overall survival of patients who underwent PBD (n¼93) was significantly worse than that of patients who did not (n¼67) by univariate analysis (P¼0.030). However, multivariate analysis revealed that PBD was not an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P¼0.227). Patients who underwent percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) had significantly worse survival than patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD, P¼0.038) and patients who did not undergo PBD (P¼0.001). The rate of peritoneal recurrence in patientswhounderwentPTBDwassignificantlyhigherthanthatofpatientswhounderwentERBD(P¼0.033)orpatientswhodidnotundergoPBD (P¼0.034). Conclusions: PBD may not affect the long‐term survival of patients with pancreatic head carcinoma if ERBD is used. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015;111:270–276. 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Background In recent years, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) has become increasingly problematic. Our aims were to clarify the relationship between NAFLD and postoperative pancreatic exocrine function and to identify the risk factors for NAFLD after PD. Methods Patients who underwent PD (n = 104) were assessed with abdominal unenhanced computed tomography (CT) to determine the fatty liver changes and were given a 13C-labeled mixed triglyceride breath test to measure pancreatic exocrine function. The percent 13CO2 cumulative dose at 7 hr (% dose 13C cum 7 hr)

Background: The indicators for proper drain management following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remain unclear. Our aim was to identify appropriate timing and proper indicators for safe drain management after PD. Methods: Prospectively collected data from 200 patients who underwent PD were evaluated. Postoperative clinical factors for clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas (CR‐POPFs) and management of surgically placed drains were analyzed retrospectively. Results:CR‐POPFsoccurredin8%ofpatients.Bylogisticregression analysis,onefactor(non‐serous fluidinthedrain)onpostoperativeday(POD) 1 and two factors (non‐serous fluid in the drain and serum CRP levels) on POD 3 and 4 were significantly associated with CR‐POPFs. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that combined predictive factors on POD 4 were the most accurate. Of163patients withserous fluidin thedrain andCRP

Background and Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of portal or superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) resection for patients with pancreatic carcinoma who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. Methods Medical records of 125 patients with pancreatic head carcinoma who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy were reviewed retrospectively. Sixty-one patients underwent PV/SMV resection and 64 patients did not. Clinicopathological factors were compared between the two groups and the prognostic impact of PV/SMV resection was evaluated using univariate and multivariate survival analysis. Results The frequency of mortality and morbidity did not differ between the two groups. Univariate analysis revealed that a significant difference in overall survival was found between patients who did and did not undergo PV/SMV resection (P = 0.046) as well as between patients with and without pathological PV/SMV invasion (P = 0.012). However, PV/SMV resection and pathological PV/SMV invasion were not independent prognostic factors by multivariate survival analysis. Among patients with PV/SMV resection, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy was the only independent prognostic factor of overall survival (P = 0.003). Conclusions Resection of the PV/SMV with adjuvant chemotherapy may provide an acceptable survival benefit to patients with pancreatic head carcinoma, which involves the PV/SMV without additional mortality and morbidity. J. Surg. Oncol. 2013;107:414–421. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Background and Objectives This study evaluated long-term outcomes for patients who received adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy after resection for pancreatic carcinoma. Methods Seventy patients who underwent surgical resection of pancreatic carcinoma were enrolled prospectively into this study. All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy with 10 cycles of gemcitabine plus S-1 every 2 weeks. Each cycle consisted of intravenous gemcitabine 700 mg/m2 on day 1 and oral S-1 50 mg/m2 for seven consecutive days, followed by a 1-week pause of chemotherapy. Long-term survival results of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy were analyzed for this cohort. Results Median follow-up time was 51.2 months. Sixty percent of patients had node-positive disease and 79% of patients underwent R0 resection. Fifty-six patients (80%) completed adjuvant chemotherapy. Median overall and disease-free survival times were 35.4 and 23.8 months, respectively. Actuarial overall and disease-free survival rates were 89% and 64% at 1 year, 64% and 50% at 2 years, and 33% and 33% at 5 years, respectively. Only negative lymph node metastasis (P = 0.010) independently correlated with long-term survival by multivariate analysis. Conclusions Long-term results of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy suggest this regimen may be safe and promising as treatment for this patient population. J. Surg. Oncol. 2012; 106:174–180. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Background and Objectives The mortality rate after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) remains 0–5% at major surgical centers with the major cause of operative death being a leak at the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the safety of duct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) at a single institute. Methods One hundred fifty consecutive patients with pancreato-biliary diseases undergoing duct-to-mucosa PG following PD between 1995 and 2005 were evaluated. One hundred forty patients underwent a pylorus-preserving PD and 10 patients underwent a conventional PD (Whipple operation). External drainage of pancreatic juice was performed in 77 cases. Results The mean operating time was 378 min and the mean blood loss was 1,640 ml. Blood transfusion was not required in 97 patients (65%). The morbidity rate was 50% (75/150), but the mortality rate was 0%. Pancreatic fistulae occurred in 11 patients (7%). Gender, age, operative procedure, portal vein resection, external drainage of the pancreatic juice, operative time, blood loss and blood transfusion did not affect the rate of pancreatic fistula. The rate of pancreatic fistulae tended to be lower in pancreatic carcinoma (3%) than non-pancreatic carcinoma (11%). Conclusions Duct-to-mucosa PG is a safe procedure for reconstruction following PD. J. Surg. Oncol. 2008;97:205–209. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1(GS) chemotherapy for pancreatic carcinoma patients, stratified by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) preoperative resectability definition.A total of 141 consecutive patients with resected pancreatic carcinoma who received adjuvant GS chemotherapy were evaluated retrospectively. According to the NCCN preoperative resectability definition, tumors were divided into resectable tumors (R group), borderline resectable tumors with portal vein contact (BR-PV group), and borderline resectable tumors with arterial contact (BR-A group). Overall survival and prognostic factors were analyzed.Overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates for the 141 patients were 89.6%, 69.9%, and 41.1%, respectively. Overall survival of the R group was significantly better than that of the BR-PV group and the BR-A group (P 0.05). Overall 5-year survival rates of the R group, the BR-PV group, and the BR-A group were 49.0%, 25.0%, and 11.3%, respectively. Arterial contact (P = 0.020), preoperative CA 19-9 level ≥150 U/ml (P 0.001), and positive nodal involvement (P = 0.025) were independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival.Adjuvant GS chemotherapy may provide a survival benefit especially for patients with resectable pancreatic carcinoma. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:405-412. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) on long-term survival in patients with pancreatic head carcinoma after surgical resection.Medical records of 160 patients with pancreatic head carcinoma who underwent surgical resection were reviewed retrospectively. Clinicopathological parameters including long-term survival were compared between patients who did and did not undergo PBD.Overall survival of patients who underwent PBD (n = 93) was significantly worse than that of patients who did not (n = 67) by univariate analysis (P = 0.030). However, multivariate analysis revealed that PBD was not an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P = 0.227). Patients who underwent percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) had significantly worse survival than patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD, P = 0.038) and patients who did not undergo PBD (P = 0.001). The rate of peritoneal recurrence in patients who underwent PTBD was significantly higher than that of patients who underwent ERBD (P = 0.033) or patients who did not undergo PBD (P = 0.034).PBD may not affect the long-term survival of patients with pancreatic head carcinoma if ERBD is used.

In recent years, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) has become increasingly problematic. Our aims were to clarify the relationship between NAFLD and postoperative pancreatic exocrine function and to identify the risk factors for NAFLD after PD.Patients who underwent PD (n = 104) were assessed with abdominal unenhanced computed tomography (CT) to determine the fatty liver changes and were given a (13) C-labeled mixed triglyceride breath test to measure pancreatic exocrine function. The percent (13) CO2 cumulative dose at 7 hr (% dose (13) C cum 7 hr)5% was considered diagnostic for pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI). Relationships between the occurrence of NAFLD and clinical factors including postoperative pancreatic exocrine function were analyzed.Twenty-six of 104 patients (25%) developed postoperative NAFLD. The postoperative CT attenuation of the liver (R = 0.326, P 0.001) and the liver-to-spleen attenuation ratio (R = 0.315, P = 0.001) significantly correlated with the postoperative values of % dose (13) C cum 7 hr. Multivariate analysis determined that postoperative PEI was the only independent risk factor for NAFLD (P = 0.025).NAFLD frequently occurs postoperatively after PD. NAFLD after PD may be closely associated with postoperative PEI.

The indicators for proper drain management following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remain unclear. Our aim was to identify appropriate timing and proper indicators for safe drain management after PD.Prospectively collected data from 200 patients who underwent PD were evaluated. Postoperative clinical factors for clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas (CR-POPFs) and management of surgically placed drains were analyzed retrospectively.CR-POPFs occurred in 8% of patients. By logistic regression analysis, one factor (non-serous fluid in the drain) on postoperative day (POD) 1 and two factors (non-serous fluid in the drain and serum CRP levels) on POD 3 and 4 were significantly associated with CR-POPFs. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that combined predictive factors on POD 4 were the most accurate. Of 163 patients with serous fluid in the drain and CRP15.6 mg/dl on POD 4, 1% had CR-POPFs, but no patient required POPF-related re-drainage. In contrast, among 37 patients with non-serous fluid in the drain or CRP levels ≥15.6 mg/dl, 35% had CR-POPFs, and 8% required POPF-related re-drainage.A combination of CRP levels and the color of surgical drain fluid, not POD1 or 3, but on POD 4, may be the most accurate indicators for safe drain management following PD.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of portal or superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) resection for patients with pancreatic carcinoma who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy.Medical records of 125 patients with pancreatic head carcinoma who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy were reviewed retrospectively. Sixty-one patients underwent PV/SMV resection and 64 patients did not. Clinicopathological factors were compared between the two groups and the prognostic impact of PV/SMV resection was evaluated using univariate and multivariate survival analysis.The frequency of mortality and morbidity did not differ between the two groups. Univariate analysis revealed that a significant difference in overall survival was found between patients who did and did not undergo PV/SMV resection (P = 0.046) as well as between patients with and without pathological PV/SMV invasion (P = 0.012). However, PV/SMV resection and pathological PV/SMV invasion were not independent prognostic factors by multivariate survival analysis. Among patients with PV/SMV resection, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy was the only independent prognostic factor of overall survival (P = 0.003).Resection of the PV/SMV with adjuvant chemotherapy may provide an acceptable survival benefit to patients with pancreatic head carcinoma, which involves the PV/SMV without additional mortality and morbidity.