Search

Hurricane and tsunami events can generate extreme water flows in nearshore regions of the United States with catastrophic consequences to coastal structures. Field records have shown that light-frame wood structures exhibit high vulnerability to wave-induced forces due to their light construction characteristics, which feature flexible connections and slender pile foundation systems. Previous research has studied the behavior of these structures under wave action, but most studies used rigid body modeling, which is shown in this study to be insufficient for capturing the force demand on these structures. Using a fluid-structure interaction (FSI) framework, this research investigated the structural and soil flexibility effects in the interaction between elevated light-frame wood structures and water flows. Study variables included the flexibility of timber-to-timber connections, soil type, pile embedment, wavelength, and wave amplitude. The study concluded that structural and soil responses to water flows can introduce strong coupled motions. Neglecting this coupling effect may underestimate the force demand on the light-frame wood structures by more than 40%. Accounting for both structural and soil flexibilities is necessary to accurately quantify the wave force demand of these structures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Composite plate shear walls/concrete-filled (C-PSW/CFs), also known as SpeedCore systems, are a relatively new structural member in American codes and standards. Prior research has focused primarily on C-PSW/CF walls with either flange/closure plates or filled composite members as boundary elements. Walls without boundary elements have also been studied, but they are no longer permitted by the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC 341-22). The reason is that composite walls without boundary elements do not provide adequate ductility for seismic design. This paper presents the results of experimental and numerical studies conducted to evaluate the cyclic lateral load behavior of C-PSW/CFs using hot-rolled structural steel members as boundary elements. The steel web plates of the C-PSW/CF specimens were connected to each other using threaded tie bars with double nut connections. Composite interaction between the steel and concrete infill was achieved using the tie bars and additional shear studs welded to the boundary elements. The composite walls were embedded and anchored to reinforced concrete foundation blocks using welded deformed bar anchors. The experimental investigations focused on the cyclic lateral load-drift responses including test observations and limit states, moment-rotation response of the plastic hinge and the section moment-curvature relationship, overall lateral stiffness, strength, and displacement ductility. The experimental results show that the specimens exceeded their nominal flexural capacities calculated using the plastic stress distribution method or fiber-based section modeling using measured material properties. The specimens had plastic hinge rotation capacity greater than 0.028 rad. and displacement ductility ratio greater than 5.2. Detailed 3D nonlinear inelastic finite element models and simpler fiber-based macro models of the tested specimens were developed and benchmarked using experimental results. The detailed 3D finite element models can reasonably simulate the global and local behavior of the specimens, and are recommended for conducting further parametric studies of composite wall design details. Simpler fiber-based macro models can efficiently simulate the cyclic lateral load behavior of the specimens, and are recommended for modeling C-PSW/CFs while simulating the behavior of multi-story building structures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examines the behavior of high-mast lighting pole (HMLP) foundations through the use of nonlinear finite-element modeling. HMLPs utilize nuts and threaded rods to clamp the light pole structure's base plate to the foundation. Inspections by the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (AKDOT&PF) have revealed widespread loosening of the nuts used on HMLPs over time. The threaded rods used are F1554 Grade 55, which are heat treated from mild steel rods, Fy = 248 MPa (36 ksi) to gain additional yield strength. This study briefly highlights the difference in postyield behavior in mild steel and high-strength steel, and proposes a probable mechanism behind the clamp-load loss experienced by Alaska's HMLPs. Because the HMLPs are much taller than traditional lighting poles, they experience larger external wind loading. This wind load is potentially stressing threaded rods into the postyield range. A previous study shows that the current tightening procedure is likely not undertightening nuts, which could be a major culprit behind loosening. As a result of this and previous research, it is believed that the nuts aren't loosening in the traditional sense--losing clamp load by rotating on the threads. Instead, the threaded rods undergo significant postyield strain during external loading. This plastic deformation is large enough in magnitude to cause the bolted joint interface to lose clamp load when the external force is removed. One factor that exacerbates this effect in some pole configurations is prying action, which is not accounted for in the design. The clamp loss mechanism is examined by applying wind loads to three pretensioned HMLP configurations using finite-element analysis software (ABAQUS). The analysis uses 3-D solid elements, contact surfaces that allow for separation, bonding surfaces where contact surfaces are not required, boundary conditions that approximate reality, displacement controlled pretension, and external wind loading represented by coupled moments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper presents the earthquake response of three low-rise frame-wall-foundation centrifuge building models, including a structural hinging-dominated, foundation rocking-dominated, and balanced design model. The models were designed such that the capacities of the dominant inelastic elements varied; however, each was subjected to a similar sequence of earthquake shaking in a 30-g centrifuge environment to facilitate comparison. Experimental results reveal that the traditional frame-wall building with a strong foundation (i.e., a hinging-dominated system) has the least potential to recover from displacements induced during earthquake shaking. As a result, this system suffered the most significant residual deformation. In contrast, systems with rocking foundations sustained a smaller peak roof acceleration, residual drift, and peak base shear despite the relatively larger peak transient drift demand. Consistent with slow cyclic test results, dissipated hysteretic energy was reasonably distributed amongst superstructure and substructure inelastic components in the balanced model during moderate and high intensity shaking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The mechanism of foundation rocking has received much attention recently due to its appealing seismic resistant features, namely, self-centering tendency and energy dissipation capability. It is well recognized, however, that other inelastic mechanisms will contribute to a system's seismic resistance. Considering the strength difference between a rocking footing and a shear wall structural fuse, and the system symmetry, six different two-story-two-bay frame-wall-foundation building models were constructed and tested in a geotechnical centrifuge. In this paper, the test program and experimental results when the models were subjected to slow cyclic loading are presented. A companion paper presents results from the dynamic phase of testing. Results indicate that, with the aid of foundation rocking, the system behaves in a ductile and stable manner with no strength degradation, even when the model is pushed to a drift of more than 2.5%. Importantly, when structural and foundation component strengths are approximately equal, the hysteretic energy is reasonably distributed among the superstructure inelastic components and the rocking foundations. Finally, numerical analyses predictions demonstrate comparable local and global response to measurements obtained during the experiments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two geotechnical centrifuge tests were designed to elicit the influence of soil-foundation-structure interaction (SFSI) and structure-soil-structure interaction (SSSI) effects on the seismic demands of an inelastic frame structure founded on individual spread footings. Four experimental cases were considered: (1) SFSI of an individual inelastic frame structure (baseline case); (2) in-plane SSSI between the frame structure and a large elastic wall structure designed to respond predominately in a rocking mode; (3) anti-plane SSSI between the frame and wall structures; and (4) combined in-plane and anti-plane SSSI between the frame structure and two wall structures. Results from Cases 1, 2, and 4 are analyzed considering 13 demand parameters. The peak seismic demands from the baseline case are compared to the peak demands from the SSSI cases to elicit the impacts of building adjacency. The number of earthquake motions that resulted in increases or decreases in the seismic demands in the frame structure are tracked for the SSSI cases. For these tests, SSSI consistently results in increased peak foundation moment and foundation base shear demands, regardless of the geometric layout of the structures. These increases propagate throughout the superstructure, resulting in increases in moment, shear and curvature ductility demands in the structural components. SSSI effects are observed to be most significant for low-to-moderate intensity earthquake motions, suggesting that particular consideration should be given to the likelihood of SSSI for highly probable earthquakes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Twenty-seven wall-splice specimens reinforced with number (No.) 15 (0.6 in.) deformed bars were tested to evaluate the effect of transverse bar spacing on the tensile resistance of the lap-spliced reinforcement. All specimens were blocks wide and 13 courses tall and were constructed in running bond with all cells fully grouted. In all cases, the lapped bars were located within a single block cell and were either spaced 0, 25, or 50 mm (0, 1, or 2 in.) apart. It was determined that the calculated tensile resistance of the reinforcement was greater for bars that were in contact and furthermore, is insensitive to the magnitude of the transverse spacing provided in the case of noncontact lap splices. It would appear that both the American and Canadian provisions are appropriate for both contact and noncontact lapped bars given the resulting levels of conservatism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]