Search

Nearly all data on mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke is based on procedures performed on biplane angiography systems. However, thrombectomy may be performed on single-plane systems in situations of triage or limited resources. We present the first US study comparing the safety and effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy performed on single-plane vs. biplane systems.A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified all patients treated with thrombectomy between July 2020 and July 2021 by a high-volume practice. Patients were dichotomized into those treated on single plane and biplane systems. Demographic, procedural, clinical and follow-up characteristics were compared.Of the 246 patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy, 70 (33%) and 141 (66%) patients were treated on SP and BP systems, respectively. No significant differences were detected in follow-up 'good functional outcome' (mRS ≤ 2; SP 51% vs BP 43%, p = 0.14), successful recanalization (SP 87% vs BP 88%, p = 0.72), intra-procedural vascular injury (SP 3% vs BP 2%, p = 0.96), or time from groin puncture to reperfusion (SP 24 min vs BP 26 min, p = 0.58). Additionally, no significant differences were detected in peri-procedural complications, fluoroscopy times or total radiation. Patients treated on single plane systems required significantly more contrast.Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke performed on single plane angiography systems is as safe and efficacious as when performed on biplane systems. Our results may have implications for increasing stroke care access, both domestically in underserved/rural areas and internationally when considering requirements for stroke care in lower-income countries.