Search

Context: Lower-extremity loading patterns change after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, there is limited research regarding energy absorption contribution (EAC) of athletes following ACLR who reinjure their ACL and those who do not. EAC can be utilized as a measure of joint loading during tasks. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Three groups of individuals (13 in each group) with matched age, sex, height. weight, and sports were enrolled. Data were collected at time of return-to-sport testing for the 2 ACLR groups. An 8-camera 3D motion capture system with a sampling rate of 120 Hz and 2 force plates capturing at 1200 Hz were used to capture joint motions in all 3 planes during a double-limb jump landing. Results: Participants in the ACLR no reinjury and ACLR reinjury groups had significantly greater hip EAC (55.8 [21.5] and 56.7 [21.2]) compared with healthy controls (19.5 [11.1]), P<.00\ and P < .001, respectively. The ACLR no reinjury and ACLR reinjury groups had significantly lower knee EAC (24.6 [22.7] and 27.4 [20.8]) compared with healthy controls (57.0 [12.2]), P < .001 and P < .001, respectively. However, the ACLR reinjury group had significantly lower ankle EAC (15.9 [4.6]) than healthy controls (23.5 [6.6]), whereas there was no statistical difference between the ACLR no reinjury group (19.7 [7.8]) and healthy controls. Conclusions: Athletes who had a second ACL injury after ACLR, and those without second ACL injury, appear to have similar hip, knee, and ankle joint loading of the surgical limb at return-to-sport testing. Nevertheless, joint loading patterns were significantly different from healthy controls. The study suggests that EAC as a measure of joint loading during a double-limb jump landing at time of return to sport may not be a strong predictor for second injury following ACLR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Joint loading following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is thought to influence long-term outcomes. However, our understanding of the role of meniscus repair at the time of ACL-R on early joint loading is limited. Objective: To assess if differences in total energy absorption and energy absorption contribution of the hip, knee, and ankle exist in the early stages of rehabilitation between patients who received an isolated ACL-R and those with concomitant meniscal repairs. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Clinical laboratory. Patients: Fifty-nine human subjects, including 27 who underwent ACL-R and 32 who underwent ACL-R with concomitant meniscal repairs. Main outcome measure: The total energy absorption and the energy absorption contribution of each joint of both the involved and uninvolved limbs during a double-limb squat task. Results: There were significant differences in energy absorption contribution between groups at the knee joint (P = .01) and the hip joint (P = .04), but not at the ankle joint (P = .48) of the involved limb. Post hoc analysis indicates that preoperative hip and knee loading differences exist and when you control for preoperative loading (analysis of covariance), the postsurgery difference was not significant. Conclusions: The results of the study suggest that the additional surgical procedure of MR may not have had negative effects on joint loading during squatting at 12 weeks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]