Search

Summary NorthMed HMO is viewed by its owners as an important vehicle for integrating rural providers in northern Michigan. Through the HMO, rural providers hope to be able to contract with government programs, while retaining private-sector patients through employer contracts. For most rural providers, NorthMed HMO does not yet represent a major source of revenues. However, the HMO is about to embark on an expansion that, if successful, will increase its importance to providers and its visibility within the service area. This planned expansion is likely to place severe demands on the financial and managerial resources of the organization. Physicians. NorthMed HMO offers a model of a rural-based HMO in which physicians play a dominant role. Rural physicians in northern Michigan own Northern Physician Organization, a physician organization which, in turn, is the major stockholder in NorthMed HMO. The geographic expansion of the HMO is tied, in large part, to the geographic expansion of the membership of Northern Physician Organization. NorthMed HMO enters new communities when a significant number of physicians in those communities joins Northern Physician Organization. When physicians purchase ownership shares in the physician organization, they indirectly become part owners of the HMO. Participation in NorthMed HMOs network has offered limited benefits to rural physicians at a minimal cost. By being a participating provider in NorthMed HMO, physicians can remain available to their patients who choose the HMO as a health insurance option. NorthMed HMO has not been aggressive in attempts to influence physician practices, and physicians bear no financial risk as a result of their participation. Participating physicians are paid under a fee-for-service arrangement with no risk sharing related to hospital use. Indirectly, through Northern Physician Organization's ownership role in the HMO, physicians have the potential to gain financially from NorthMed HMOs growth if the HMO were to be sold, but this diffuse incentive is unlikely to have an impact on physicians' day-to-day behavior. The relationship between NorthMed HMO and its physicians is likely to change soon. The number of HMO patients seen by physicians will increase if the HMO succeeds in securing Medicare and Medicaid contracts, and if its new point-of-service option attracts additional private-sector enrollees. NorthMed HMO plans to contract with Northern Physician Organization on a capitated basis to serve the HMOs enrollees, an arrangement that would place financial responsibility for managing care delivery more directly on participating physicians. This is likely to result in more aggressive utilization review and quality assurance measures. In effect, rural physicians will be faced with a difficult trade-off that they have, to this point, largely avoided: They will be asked to accept financial risk and oversight of their practices in return for the assurance that their HMO can successfully compete for local patients (and their insurance dollars) against health plans that are owned and managed by entities located outside of their rural area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study is to identify the local availability and trends in local availability of imaging technology and interpretation services in rural hospitals in the northwestern United States during the period between 1991 to 1994. Another objective is to describe hospital and community factors associated with the diffusion of image production and interpretation services. The information for this study was gathered through telephone surveys of rural hospital administrators in eight northwestern states in 1991 and 1994. The availability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) equipment, computed tomography (CT) scanners, ultrasonography equipment, and dedicated mammography equipment increased between 1991 and 1994. The increases in MRI units were primarily in mobile equipment, while ultrasonography and mammography equipment increases were primarily fixed hospital-based units. In 1994, image interpretation in the rural hospitals was provided by both primary care and radiology physicians. Forty-six (11.5%) of the rural hospitals had no on-site radiology services and only 73 (18%) had daily radiology services. Between 1991 and 1994, 12 hospitals gained at least once-a-week radiology services, but 24 lost all radiology services. Teleradiology availability more than doubled during the three years. Radiologic technology has diffused widely into rural communities in this region of the United States at differing rates for large and small hospitals. Radiologists are available to these hospitals only 46 percent of the days each year, with more days of availability in the larger hospitals and fewer days in the smaller hospitals. Teleradiology capability is increasing more rapidly in the larger hospitals that have radiologists more readily available [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the late 1980s several published articles predicted a crisis in the availability of obstetric care due to declining numbers of rural obstetrical providers. Several state and national studies documented the adverse impact of malpractice and time demands on both urban and rural physicians. But only limited information is available to document current trends in rural obstetrical practice and assess whether or not the predicted crisis occurred. This study sought to provide that updated information for rural Minnesota. A telephone survey of all rural Minnesota obstetrical providers was used to document the number, location, and specialty of rural obstetrical providers, their practice limitations, and plans for future practice. This data was combined with state perinatal statistics for each county to further assess obstetrical care availability and perinatal outcomes. All rural Minnesota obstetricians and certified nurse midwives provide obstetrical care as did 69 percent of all rural family physicians. Only 27 percent of rural obstetrical providers put any type of restrictions on their obstetrical practices. During the past year, 67 currently practicing rural physicians have stopped providing obstetrical care while 55 new obstetrical providers have begun rural practice. Two to 3 percent of current rural providers plan to retire or discontinue obstetrical services during the next five years. The provider demographics from the survey identified eight counties with no prenatal providers, and 22 additional communities of decreased provider availability. However, only two of the counties with no prenatal providers and five of the counties with areas of limited providers had increased percentages of adverse prenatal outcomes such as low birthweight or late prenatal care. This study concluded that Minnesota does not have a serious statewide problem with availability of rural obstetrical providers. However, a few isolated regions of the state have limited provider availability, including limited availability of local high-risk services and consultants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]