Search

Copyright of Journal of Rural & Community Development is the property of Brandon University, Rural Development Institute and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This paper examines the role of in-migrants in the functional transformation of amenity-rich places. Its overarching goal is to determine if and how internal migrants arriving from larger settlement areas (i.e., counterurbanites) are contributing to the creation of functionally diverse (hybrid), or functionally limited (pure) commercial landscapes in places endowed with heritage assets. We focus on Paris, an historic town situated at the confluence of the Grand and Nith Rivers in southern Ontario. Three objectives guide the research: (1) to determine which commercial landscape form (hybrid or pure) and landscape generating process (creative enhancement or destruction) best characterizes the downtown; (2) to establish counterurbanite presence in this commercial core; and (3) to assess their role in the downtown's recent evolution. Evidence gleaned from secondary sources, and local fieldwork reveals that creative enhancement (functional addition), rather than creative destruction (functional displacement) is the dominant process. This has given rise to a hybrid landscape, where quotidian businesses (i.e., those selling ordinary goods and services) accompany five non-quotidian (i.e., distinctive) product types (i.e., authentic heritage, infused heritage, heritage-enhanced, faux-authentic heritage, and non-heritage boutique), each relying in different ways on the town's heritage assets. Information gathered from 35 proprietors finds that counterurbanites, and other inmigrants, dominate the downtown core, with only six non-migrant proprietors represented. In-comers, including counterurbanites, sell both quotidian and nonquotidian products, with non-migrant vendors offering only ordinary goods and services. These findings reveal that by selling both product types, counterurbanites are contributing to the creation of a hybrid landscape in the city's countryside. Their attraction is thus an important ingredient for facilitating diversity and economic viability in small settlement areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Farming is a well-known stressful occupation, with farmers facing a multitude of stressors and higher rates of mental health problems than the general population. Farming continues to change, with greater use of technology, changing ownership and management of farms, globalization of agricultural inputs and products, and climate change. Although there has been research to document these changes, to the researchers' knowledge there has been no qualitative studies, particularly within Canada, to understand farmers' perceptions of these changes and link them to their stressors and mental health. In this qualitative study, based on 16 in-depth interviews with small-scale farmers in Grey County of Southwestern Ontario, Canada, we explored farmers' perceptions of changing farming practices and their implications for their health as well as ways of responding and adapting to these changes. Thematic analysis using a social ecology framework revealed a number of major themes. Farmers' relationships to change were complex with both benefits and challenges of changing farm practices for health and well-being--a "double-edged sword." Technology changes were important new tools, while weather had become more extreme, rapid and un-predictable. Growing weather uncertainty generated brutal stress for some. Farmers described turning to ecological farming and the resilience that they experience from diversified farming which connects them to the land "essentially being at one with place." Their passion for farming connected to beliefs about protecting the land, even if most markets do not reward a farmer for doing so. Farmers also highlighted the lack of support they experienced from governments--dealing with bureaucracy, community--and experiences of isolation. Implications for policies and systems include increased support for farmers financially and administratively and interventions which build on their work with farm organizations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]