Search

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) and 1987 ACR criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and the respective role of the algorithm and scoring of the ACR/EULAR., Methods: In total, 270 patients with recent-onset arthritis of < 1 year duration were included prospectively between 1995 and 1997 and followed for 2 years. RA was defined as the combination, at completion of followup, of RA diagnosed by an office-based rheumatologist and treatment with a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug or glucocorticoid. We compared the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the criteria sets in the overall population, in the subgroup meeting the tree condition for ACR/EULAR scoring, and in the overall population classified according the full tree., Results: At baseline, 111 of the 270 patients had better alternative diagnoses and 16 had erosions typical for RA; of the 143 remaining patients, 52 had more than 6 ACR/EULAR 2010 points (indicating definite RA) and 91 had fewer than 6 points. After 2 years, 11/16 patients with erosions and 40/52 with more than 6 points had RA. 100 of the 270 patients met the reference standard for RA. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the ACR/EULAR (full tree) were 51/100 (51%), 153/170 (90%), 51/68 (75.4%), and 153/202 (75.7%), respectively. Diagnostic accuracies of the ACR/EULAR score and ACR 1987 criteria were not statistically different., Conclusion: Much of the improvement of the ACR/EULAR criteria was ascribable to the use of exclusion criteria in the algorithm.

Objective: We assessed levels of agreement between a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at inclusion in a recent-onset arthritis cohort, then 2 and 10 years later. Performance of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria alone or combined with rheumatologist diagnosis, and of recent new criteria adding antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptides ("anti-CCP-revised criteria") to existing ACR criteria, was evaluated., Methods: In total, 270 patients with recent-onset arthritis of less than 1 year duration were included between 1995 and 1997 and followed for 2 years. A diagnosis was recorded by an office-based rheumatologist (OBR) at inclusion, then 2 years later. In 2007, a questionnaire was sent to each rheumatologist to collect the final diagnosis, which was considered the reference., Results: Final diagnosis was available for 164 patients: 57 had RA. Agreement was low (kappa = 0.27) between the baseline and final diagnoses, and substantial (kappa = 0.69) between the 2-year and final diagnoses. Anti-CCP-revised criteria had sensitivity of 65% to 81% and specificity of 55% to 75%. Sensitivity and specificity of ACR criteria were 57.9% (44.1%-70.9%) and 74.8% (65.5%-82.7%) at inclusion, 80.7% (70.5%-90.0%) and 63.6% (54.5%-72.7%) at 2 years. The combination OBR diagnosis/ACR criteria after 2 years showed considerably increased specificity (87% vs 64%) and slightly decreased sensitivity (77% vs 81%)., Conclusion: ACR criteria for RA showed poor performance even at 2 years. The absence of exclusion criteria may explain the lack of specificity, which improved when combined with the OBR diagnosis. Adding anti-CCP criteria to the existing criteria could help in diagnosing RA.

Objective: To evaluate the ability of baseline hand radiographs to predict the diagnosis 2 years later in a cohort of patients with early arthritis., Methods: A total of 258 patients with arthritis onset within the previous year were evaluated. At baseline, all patients underwent a standardized evaluation including laboratory tests and radiographs. Hand radiographs were read by a blinded observer who used a standardized procedure for detecting features of crystal deposition diseases and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). After 30 +/- 11.3 months, the final diagnosis was established by a panel of rheumatologists. All radiographs were evaluated., Results: Significant associations were found between radiographic features and a clinical diagnosis of RA, calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) arthritis, and hydroxyapatite arthritis. No radiographic abnormalities suggesting psoriatic arthritis or gout were seen. The sensitivities of hand radiographs for diagnosing CPPD or hydroxyapatite arthritis ranged from 80% to 100%. Baseline hand radiographs suggested the final diagnosis in 31/258 patients, including 21 (22.5%) of the 93 patients with RA, 10 of the 11 (91%) patients with CPPD or hydroxyapatite deposition disease, and none of the patients with other disorders. Sensitivity was 29%, specificity 86.5%, positive predictive value 61%, and negative predictive value 63%., Conclusion: In our cohort of patients with recent arthritis, the overall performance of hand radiographs in predicting a diagnosis 2 years later was modest. However, they had an excellent diagnostic value for calcium deposition diseases.

Objective: In a cohort of patients with early arthritis, to evaluate how well foot radiographs at study inclusion predicted a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) 2 years later., Methods: A cohort of patients with arthritis of less than one year duration was evaluated in a multicenter study and followed for 30 +/- 11 months. An observer blinded to patient data read all 149 hand and foot radiographs done at study inclusion, using item 7 of the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for RA and Sharp's method to score erosions and joint space narrowing., Results: The kappa coefficient for the 1987 ACR item 7 was 0.52 for bony decalcification and 0.87 for erosions. Intra and interobserver correlation coefficients for Sharp's scores ranged from 0.90 to 0.98. Erosions at the feet were significantly associated with RA. The item 7 erosion component at the feet was more specific than the full item 7 (97.5% vs 94%; p = 0.01). Sharp's erosion score at the feet was not better than the erosion component of item 7 (sensitivity 18%; specificity 97.5%). Combined use of radiographs of the hands and feet improved the diagnostic performance of the item 7 erosion component; (sensitivity and specificity of item 7 erosions at the hands combined with the feet were 32.5% and 94.5%, respectively)., Conclusion: The "erosion" criterion at the feet had the best diagnostic performance and was significantly associated with a diagnosis of RA. Combining hand and foot radiographs improved diagnostic performance.

Objective: To compare the diagnostic values of antiperinuclear factor (APF), antikeratin antibody (AKA), and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptides (anti-CCP) to discriminate between patients with and without rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to determine the diagnostic value of anti-CCP used alone or with other tests., Methods: Two hundred and seventy patients with early arthritis underwent standardized investigations in 1995-1997. The clinical utility of APF, AKA, and anti-CCP in first-visit sera was evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic curves. Combinations of anti-CCP with other laboratory tests were assessed by multiple logistic regression., Results: Anti-CCP, APF, and AKA were not perfectly correlated with one another. Anti-CCP with 53 UI as the cutoff was 47% sensitive and 93% specific, versus 52% and 79%, and 47% and 94%, for APF and AKA, respectively. Multiple logistic regression selected anti-CCP, AKA, IgM-rheumatoid factor (RF) ELISA, and the latex test., Conclusion: Rheumatologists can routinely use 2 or 3 tests for diagnosing RA (latex and/or IgM RF ELISA, and either AKA or anti-CCP ELISA) and can add a third or fourth test when the diagnosis remains in doubt.

Objective: To evaluate the ability of hand radiographs collected at study inclusion to predict a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) 2 years later, in a cohort of patients with early arthritis., Methods: We evaluated 270 patients with arthritis of less than one year duration. At the first visit, all patients underwent a standardized evaluation including laboratory tests and radiographs. Followup was 30+/-11.3 mo. The hand radiographs were read by observers blinded to patient data who looked for item 7 of the 1987 ACR criteria for RA and used Sharp's method to score erosions and joint space narrowing., Results: The kappa coefficient for ACR item 7 was < 0.65 for bony decalcification and > 0.8 for erosions. Intra and interobserver correlation coefficients for Sharp score ranged from 0.90 to 0.95. The "erosion" component of ACR item 7 was more specific than the full item 7 (96% versus 87.5%; p = 0.02). Sharp erosion score was not better than the erosion component of item 7 (sensitivity 17%; specificity 96%)., Conclusion: Regardless of the criterion used, hand radiographs were of limited value to predict which patients would be considered as having RA 2 years later. Diagnostic performance was similar for the "erosions" component of the 1987 ACR item 7 and for Sharp erosion score. The full 1987 ACR item 7 (erosions or bony decalcification) performed less well.