Search

The aim of this study was to investigate if reconstructed felid embryos obtained by intraspecies or intergeneric cloning can develop in vitro. Fibroblast cells (f) from a domestic cat (DCf), marbled cat (MCf) and bovine (Bf) were used as donor cells, and oocytes (o) from domestic cats (DCo) and bovine (Bo) were used as recipient cytoplasts. There were two intraspecies (donor cell + recipient cytoplast: DCf + DCo and Bf + Bo) and three intergeneric (MCf + DCo, DCf + Bo and MCf + Bo) cloning groups in the study. In Experiment 1, the effects of manipulation media, modified TCM-199 (199H) or Emcare holding medium (EHM), on in vitro development of DCf + DCo embryos were investigated. The blastocyst formation rate (BFR) of the embryos manipulated in EHM (33.3%) was higher (P<0.05) compared with those manipulated in 199H (18.1%). In Experiment 2, DCf + DCo and MCf + DCo embryos were cocultured with or without domestic cat oviductal epithelium cells. Irrespective of coculture, the same BFR was obtained for DCf + DCo embryos (44.4 vs. 38.0%), while MCf + DCo embryos could not develop beyond the morula stage. In experiment 3, although the development of MCf + DCo and DCf + Bo embryos was arrested at the morula stage, 8.6% of MCf + Bo embryos were able to develop to the blastocyst stage. These results demonstrated that EHM was superior to 199H as an embryo manipulation medium and that the DCo and Bo could support the early embryonic development of intergeneric cloned marbled cat embryos up to the morula stage. However, postimplantation development still needs to be investigated.

This study investigated the effect of donor cell types on the developmental potential and quality of cloned swamp buffalo embryos in comparison with cloned cattle embryos. Fetal fibroblasts (FFs), ear fibroblasts (EFs), granulosa cells (GCs) and cumulus cells (CCs) were used as the donor cells in both buffalo and cattle. The cloned cattle or buffalo embryos were produced by fusion of the individual donor cells with enucleated cattle or buffalo oocytes, respectively. The reconstructed (cloned) embryos and in vitro matured oocytes without enucleation were parthenogenetically activated (PA) and cultured for 7 days. Their developmental ability to the blastocyst stage was evaluated. The total number of trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) cells and the ICM ratio in each blastocyst was determined by differential staining as an indicator of embryo quality. The fusion rate of CCs with enucleated oocytes was significantly lower than for those of other donor cell types both in cattle and buffalo. The rates of cleavage and development to the 8-cell, morula and blastocyst stages of cloned embryos derived from all donor cell types did not significantly differ within the same species. However, the cleavage rate of cloned cattle embryos derived from FFs was significantly higher than those of cattle PA and cloned buffalo embryos. The blastocyst rates of cloned cattle embryos, except for the ones derived from CCs, were significantly higher than those of cloned buffalo embryos. In buffalo, only cloned embryos derived from CCs showed a significantly higher blastocyst rate than that of PA embryos. In contrast, all the cloned cattle embryos showed significantly higher blastocyst rates than that of PA embryos. There was no difference in ICM ratio among any of the blastocysts derived from any of the donor cell types and PA embryos in both species. FFs, EFs, GCs and CCs had similar potentials to support development of cloned cattle and buffalo embryos to the blastocyst stage with the same quality.