Search

Introduction: This debate essay proposes possible remedies to the shortage of nurses in acute inpatient mental health settings and draws inspiration from a Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing editorial, Glascott and McKeown (2022, 29, 767). Aim: The aim is to stimulate debate within the profession. The art and science of nursing continues to develop but staffing shortages in key areas undermine practice, leadership, academic and policy efforts to improve the quality of care for people attending services. Method: This is a debate essay which draws on the authors' experience and presents ideas based on extant literature. Results: Organisational, professional and wider societal challenges are explored. Practice‐based solutions as well as recommendations for improving the terms and conditions of employment of nurses are made. Opportunities which may empower the nursing profession are promulgated. Discussion: It is intended that this paper will provoke further discourse and may reflect the 'call to action' advocated by Glascott and McKeown (Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 2022, 29, 767). Implications for Practice: While the focus is on acute inpatient mental health nursing, the ideas presented may have an application to wider nursing groups or a wider cadre of public sector workers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accessible summary: What is known on the subject?: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is recognized as an increasingly important feature of healthcare research, education and public policy.In mental health, PPI is increasingly seen as evidence of the further democratization of services, which started with de‐institutionalization in the 1960s and the recovery movement in the 1990s.While much is known about learning enablers and learning gains on generic community‐based training programmes, less is known about PPI‐specific programmes in mental health. What this paper adds to existing knowledge?: Participants at a national training programme to support the engagement of service users, their families and carers in mental health services identified training topics of greatest importance to them and reported on what they learnt and what helped their learning.Patient and public involvement training initiatives aimed at supporting the engagement of service users, their families and carers should emphasize individual needs and local contexts.Training programmes should not make artificial or actual distinctions between the programme participants who are health professionals and those who are non‐professionals, such as service users.To our knowledge, this PPI initiative is the first time a national health service provider has sought to develop an engagement structure in mental health on a state‐wide basis. What are the implications for practice?: Participants in training programmes designed to support patient and public involvement believe that such programmes should include understanding how conflict is resolved, how committees work effectively and how to develop interpersonal and facilitation skills.Training programmes in mental health involving both professional and non‐professional participants requires all the participants to work together in particular at commissioning and design stages to achieve their desired outcome.The evaluation of the training programme to support the roll‐out of this initiative offers lessons to others who may wish to pursue similar structures in other jurisdictions. Introduction: The Irish national mental health service provider commissioned a national training programme to support a patient and public involvement (PPI) initiative in mental health services. The programme evaluation afforded an opportunity to describe the learning gains and learning enablers and the factors that support PPI in mental health. Aim: We aimed to evaluate a PPI training programme across nine regional administrative units in a national mental health service. Methods: We conducted a participant exit survey, using the Student Assessment of Learning Gains (SALG) instrument. We analysed the survey responses using SPSS version 24 software and applied directed content analysis to the narrative comments provided in open‐ended questions. Results: A total of 54 participants returned the completed questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 60%. The overall mean SALG score yielded was 3.97 (SD 0.66; range 1–5), indicating that participants reported very good to excellent gains in their learning from the programme. Participants who offered narrative comments indicated an overall positive experience but suggested that all stakeholders should work together to co‐produce the training. Discussion: All the stakeholders in a PPI training initiative to support the engagement of service users, their families and carers in mental health should work together to achieve their desired outcome. This requires co‐production in the design, delivery and evaluation of the training initiative, and co‐production can impact at both individual and local levels. Implications for Practice: PPI training initiatives in mental health should retain a focus on understanding conflict resolution, committee effectiveness, interpersonal and facilitation skills. Ensuring a shared understanding of key concepts, such as co‐production, is a necessary prerequisite at the co‐commissioning, co‐design, co‐planning, co‐delivery and co‐assessment stages of programme development, as is the need to avoid artificial or actual distinctions between health professionals and those who are non‐professionals, such as service users. Relevance statement: Mental health engagement and PPI are key principles underpinning modern mental health services and may increasingly impact on wider health service provision including policy and research imperatives. This paper discusses the evaluation of a PPI training programme and offers practical insights as to how such initiatives can be improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]