Search

Accessible Summary: What is known on the subject?: Seclusion is a harmful and traumatising intervention for people accessing mental health services.People who are subject to seclusion in inpatient mental health services often first experience this within the first 24 h following admission.There is limited research examining how recent contact with services impacts the likelihood of seclusion when people are admitted to inpatient services. What the paper adds to existing knowledge?: Males, Māori and Pasifika experience higher rates of seclusion within the first 24 h following inpatient admission.People perceived by clinicians as overactive, aggressive, disruptive or agitated are seven times more likely to be secluded within the first 24 h.People referred from police or justice services are three times more likely to be secluded within the first 24 h.People who had frequent contact with community mental health services prior to inpatient admission were less likely to be secluded. What are the implications for practice?: The first 24 h of inpatient admission is a critical focus for eliminating the use of seclusion. Initial interactions with people recently admitted should focus on nurturing relationships and reducing distress.Mental health staff should consider the person's cultural needs, referral pathway, recent service contact and baseline ratings on the Health of the Nation Outcomes Scales (HoNOS) when working proactively to prevent the use of seclusion in the first 24 h following admission.Strengthening the focus on nurturing relationships, cultural understanding and non‐coercive de‐escalation approaches requires leadership support and strategic workforce development. Introduction: People who experience seclusion in inpatient mental health services often do so within the first 24 h following admission. There is limited research examining the potential contributing factors, particularly recent contact with services. Aim/Question: To identify factors associated with seclusion within the first 24 h following admission into acute inpatient mental health services. Method: A retrospective analysis was undertaken using routinely collected data from Aotearoa New Zealand mental health services. Results: A higher likelihood of seclusion within the first 24 h following admission was associated with: males, Māori, Pasifika, referrals from police/justice services, inpatient transfers, recent contact with crisis assessment teams and clinician perceptions of aggression, problematic substance use, cognitive problems and hallucinations or delusions. Recent contact with community mental health services was associated with a lower likelihood. Discussion: People's cultural needs, referral pathway, recent service contact and HoNOS scores should be considered when working to prevent the use of seclusion in the first 24 h following admission. Implications for Practice: The first 24 h following inpatient admission is a critical period for preventing the use of seclusion. Nurturing relationships, cultural understanding and use of non‐coercive de‐escalation approaches can support better outcomes for people recently admitted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accessible Summary: What is known on the subject?: Mental health legislation is currently under review following recommendations for repeal and replacement.Through the statutory role of the second health professional, mental health nurses are in a strong position to offer a unique clinical perspective, engagement and advocacy for tangata whaiora (person seeking wellness) and whānau.Māori are more likely to be subject to a compulsory treatment order than non‐Māori.Whānau involvement in care is a core element to well‐being from a Te Ao Māori (Māori world view) perspective. What this paper adds to existing knowledge?: Understanding the level of whānau involvement in the MHA process.Understanding challenges for nursing practice for consideration in the current review of MHA legislation.Identification of the opportunity nurses have to contribute to reducing high rates of Māori under CTOs. What are the implications for practice?: The current MHA review needs to include the resourcing required to support the clinicians practising in statutory roles.More emphasis is needed to build the cultural knowledge and capability of the nursing workforce to integrate principles of a Te Ao Māori worldview into care delivery.These learnings highlight the importance of nursing responsibility in the SHP role. Introduction: Clinical practice within statutory roles is an important issue for the nursing profession. There is increasing involvement of nurses undertaking statutory roles and opportunities for nurses to advocate and offer their unique clinical opinion regarding the need for restrictive measures imposed by mental health act legislation. Aim: The aim of this study was to analyse whether registered nurses who undertake the role of second health professional (SHP) within New Zealand's Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act (1992) (MHA) are meeting the expectations of that role. Method: A retrospective analysis of 156 cases was undertaken of clinical reports completed by registered nurses. The reports were measured against an established competency framework modified to include MHA expectations for whānau (family) involvement. Results: From a sample of 156 cases, 22 were identified as reviews of initial orders for assessment and treatment while 134 were opinions related to the application for a compulsory treatment order (CTO). In most cases, reports achieved a good standard. There were limitations in nurses completing the documentation to the required standard, and adaptations were evident in efforts to meet clinical and legal expectations. There was a significant absence of evidence of whānau consultation. Discussion Resourcing through education, support and ongoing development are required to ensure that nurses are equipped to meet the expectations of the legislation. There is an opportunity for nurses to influence decision‐making and support the reduction in use of community treatment orders. A review of the existing competency framework is required to include cultural approaches and involvement of whānau. Implications for Practice: It is important to understand the factors that strengthen nursing practice to improve health outcomes and tangata whaiora and whānau experience. This study uses methods of clinical audit to describe current practice and establish an evidence base to measure change. It also offers important learnings for consideration within MHA legislation review and for nursing workforce development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]