Search

Today, microsurgery plays a fundamental role in plastic surgery, expanding surgical possibilities for cancer, trauma and aesthetic-related surgery. However, throughout the years, teaching and training systems for microsurgery have not evolved in the same manner as its operative techniques. The use of rats has been, and still is, the standard model for microsurgery training. However, stringent laws for animals used in experiments, combined with the rising costs of this model, have instigated the need to find alternative methods. To overcome this dilemma, we have developed a three-step approach to optimise microsurgery training, particularly when there is no access to animal laboratories., (Copyright 2009 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In this study, we introduce a new microvascular anastomosis technique called 'PCA' (Posterior wall first--Continuous interrupted--Airborne). The conventional microvascular anastomosis (CI), with single interrupted stitches, requires a long time to be completed, as each suture must be tied before starting the following stitch. Surgeons are often searching to reduce microsurgery time, particularly when there are multiple vessels to be anastomosed or when there is a prerequisite for the ischemia time to be quick., Methods: The authors conducted a comparative study of PCA and CI on 40 Wistar-albino rats. The femoral arteries and veins of each rat were used, resulting in a total of 160 vessels, with a diameter of 0.8 to 1mm. The rats were divided into two groups. Patency rates were compared between the two groups, using the chi-square test. The times required to perform the anastomosis were compared using the Student's t test. A p value<0.001 was considered significant., Results: The mean time required for microvascular anastomosis of the femoral arteries was 22 minutes (mins) and 46 seconds (secs) in the PCA group, and 28 mins and 50 secs in the CI group. The mean time required for microvascular anastomosis of veins was 19 mins and 20 secs in the PCA group, and 23 mins and 36 secs in the CI group., Conclusion: The combination of the three different techniques (posterior wall first, continuous-interrupted, and airborne), used for the microvascular anastomosis, is safe, secure, and time-saving. The advantages of this combined method are the benefits of a single stitch, the increased speed of a continuous suture, and the reduced time of tying. The PCA technique may be helpful to selected clinical situations, due to a reduction in microsurgical time, as in such cases of multiple digital replantations, multiple "in chain" free flaps, vein grafts, and high metabolic free flaps, such as the intestine free microvascular transfer.