Search

Chest masculinization surgery is an increasingly common procedure and has offered significant benefits to the gender-diverse community. Although major complications are an infrequent occurrence in chest masculinization surgery, they may still impact surgical success. While the long-term success of chest masculinization surgery has been examined through patient-reported outcome measures, there is no study that has assessed the association between complications and patient-reported outcomes. In this study, patients who underwent double incision or periareolar mastectomies for chest masculinization by a single surgeon were surveyed. Demographic, operative, and postoperative variables were obtained from medical records. The BODY-Q and SCAR-Q modules (Q-Portfolio.org) were used to assess postoperative patient-reported outcomes. There were 151 survey responders (43% response rate), 132 without complications and 19 with complications. No significant differences in patient-reported outcomes were noted when comparing the groups with and without complications. While some providers may be reluctant to offer chest masculinization to patients they deem high risk for complications, patients and providers should be assured that complications do not significantly impact patient satisfaction. LAY SUMMARY: Gender-affirming chest masculinization surgery is increasingly common. We investigated the impact of complications on patient-reported outcomes in chest masculinization. Patients and providers should be assured that complications do not significantly impact patient satisfaction., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Purpose: The choice of pedicle in reduction mammaplasty is highly variable with prior studies demonstrating high patient satisfaction in most cases. This study aimed to examine the impact of pedicle type on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty., Methods: A total of 588 patients underwent bilateral reduction mammaplasty with Wise pattern or modified Robertson incision by 13 surgeons at a single institution. Clinical outcomes were compared according to the pedicle type in all patients and BREAST-Q responders (32% response rate). Survey respondents were sub-grouped by resection volume, and the BREAST-Q satisfaction scores were compared., Results: Among all included reduction mammoplasties, 439 (75%) were performed using inferior pedicles, and 149 (25%) using superior or superomedial pedicles. Responders and non-responders were similar in preoperative characteristics including age, body measurements, and comorbidities. Although a higher incidence of infection occurred among the responders, clinical outcomes were comparable across all pedicle types. A total of 187 patients completed the BREAST-Q. Compared to the superior pedicle group, respondents in the inferior pedicle group reported higher nipple satisfaction, even when adjusted for resection weight over 500 g. In contrast, the superior pedicle group had better sexual well-being scores, which persisted in resection weight less than 500 g (all p values <0.05)., Conclusion: Inferior pedicles were associated with greater nipple satisfaction and superior pedicles were associated with greater sexual satisfaction. Our findings suggest that those with resections less than 500 g were more satisfied with superior pedicles whereas those with greater resections were more satisfied with inferior pedicles., (Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

While there are numerous predictive models for estimating resection weight, their accuracy may not be strong. Through institutional data of patients who received reduction mammaplasty, this study demonstrates that preoperative sternal notch-to-nipple distance is not an optimal predictive factor for differences in final resection weight, complication rates, and patient reported outcomes. Our results showed that there is a weak correlation between preoperative sternal notch to nipple asymmetry and final resection weight asymmetry. Additionally, significant breast asymmetry is not tied to an increase in complication rates or poorer patient reported outcomes. There is an indication to reconsider the use of such absolute measures for determining who may benefit from reduction mammaplasty., (Copyright © 2023 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

There is currently no consensus on the treatment of median sternotomy patients presenting secondarily with deep sternal wound infection or symptomatic sternal nonunion. We have developed a novel approach to sternal bone fixation when concerns for open wounds or microbial colonization preclude the use of permanent hardware placement: (1) sternal closure with absorbable interosseous monocortical horizontal mattress sutures followed by (2) multilayered soft tissue closure with pectoralis major advancement or turnover flaps. Benefits of this technique include: closure of retrosternal dead-space, tension offloading of the soft tissue closure, repair of transverse sternal fractures, and preservation of internal mammary artery (IMA) perforators for potential pectoralis turnover flaps. In our early experience, this technique has been successful at promoting functional sternal union - even in secondary closure of high-risk patients contraindicated for permanent hardware placement., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)