Search

The posterior wall of the central sulcus in forelimb area of SI has been expolred with extracellular micro-electrodes in baboons lightyl anaesthetized with nitrous oxide and sodium thiopentone. 2. The excitatory responses of 130 single units to low intensity electrical stimulation of the deep radial (muscle) and the superficial radial (cutaneous) nerves have been investigated. 3. Units that responded only to muscle nerve stimulation were located in area 3a but overlapped into area 3b. Units that responded only to cutaneous nerve stimulation were found mainly in area 3b but a number occurred in area 3a. Units that responded to both muscle and nerve stimuli (convergent units) were found throughout area 3a and the rostral part of area 3b. 4. Latency analyses of all three response groups revealed a single population of units responding to low threshold muscle nerve stimulation (mean latency 8.5 msec), and both early and late populations responding to low threshold cutaneous nerve stimulation (mean latencies 9.5 and 13.6 msec respectively). A number of the convergent units had very similar latencies for both inputs. 5. Electrical stimulation within area 3a deminstrated a projection from areas 1 and 3b to area 3a; such a pathway may provide a route for excitation of the late skin population which was found mainly in area 3a. 6. In area 3a units commonly responded to light touch, local pressure or deep pressure but only rarely to movement of hairs. A number of the convergent units responded to natural stimulation of cutaneous receptors.

1. Intracellular records were obtained from motoneurones innervating muscles of the baboon's forearm and hand. Monosynaptic excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) were elicited by stimulation of motor cortex (CM EPSPs) and peripheral nerves (Ia EPSPs).2. CM EPSPs were larger on average in motoneurones innervating intrinsic hand muscles and extensor digitorum communis (EDC) than in neurones of other forearm muscles.3. Among motoneurones of the median nerve, the CM EPSP tended to be larger for cells with more rapidly conducting axons than for those with more slowly conducting axons. Among motoneurones of EDC the opposite tendency was found.4. The afferent fibres responsible for the Ia EPSP nearly always had a lower stimulus threshold than that of motor axons in the same nerve. Some observations were made concerning the distribution of heteronymous Ia EPSPs.5. Among motoneurones of a given nerve, those with large Ia EPSPs tended to receive larger CM EPSPs than did cells in which the Ia EPSP was small.6. The results are discussed in relation to problems concerning the pyramidal control of hand and finger movement.

1. Peripheral nerves of the baboon's forelimb were stimulated at different sites, and the latencies of antidromic action potentials were measured in intracellular records from forelimb motoneurones.2. The conduction velocity of single motor axons was slower in the brachial plexus than in the nerves of the arm and forearm. This proximal slowing of conduction velocity was more marked for rapidly conducting axons than for the more slowly conducting ones.3. Gross recordings from dorsal and ventral roots showed that the conduction velocity was slower in the brachial plexus than in the arm for fast afferent as well as efferent nerve fibres.4. The proximal slowing of conduction velocity was shown to be due neither to errors of measurement nor to proximo-distal differences of temperature.

1. Much current thinking about voluntary movement assumes that the segmental gamma loops can function as a servomechanism operated by the brain. However, the alpha motoneurones of the baboon's hand receive a powerful monosynaptic (CM) projection from the precentral gyrus. If servo-driving from the same cortical area is to be possible, it must project independently to the fusimotor neurones and have sufficient power to increase the afferent signalling from the muscle spindles. The cortical thresholds for contraction of m. extensor digitorum communis and for acceleration of the discharges of its muscle spindles have therefore been compared.2. Significant results in this context require that the spindles studied be coupled in parallel with the responding extrafusal muscle fibres. Many spindles were not unloaded by the submaximal contractions evoked by cortical stimulation, although all so tested were unloaded by maximal motor nerve twitches. Reasons are given for thinking that such apparent lack of parallel coupling is an artifact of complex intramuscular anatomy and limitation of shortening by ;isometric' myography.3. A brief burst of corticospinal volleys at 500/sec, which is specially effective in exciting alpha motoneurones over the CM projection, failed to excite spindle afferents at or below the threshold for a cortical ;twitch'.4. In a few epileptiform discharges, bursts of spindle acceleration occurred independently of the clonic contractions. A relatively direct and independent cortico-fusimotor (CF) projection may therefore exist.5. Prolonged near-threshold stimulation at 50-100/sec, which allows time for temporal summation in the less direct projections (e.g. cortico-interneuronal, cortico-rubro-spinal) and does not cause frequency-potentiation at CM synapses, gives abundant evidence of independent alpha and fusimotor projections, whose actions hardly outlast the stimulation period.6. Although independent CF projections would permit servo-driving in natural movements of the hand (given adequate loop gain), there has been no evidence of servo-driving by cortical stimulation or in the spontaneous contractions of light anaesthesia.7. Independent projections would provide for controlled alphagamma co-excitation in the servo-governing of natural movements (Matthews, 1964).8. Evidence is reviewed that the CM projection itself may be part of an important control loop for voluntary movement in primates. A corollary would be a diminished importance of CF projections for segmental loops and an increased importance for maintaining the spindle input to cortical loops.

1. One hundred and fifty efferent axons innervating m. extensor digitorum communis (EDC) were isolated in filaments of C7 and C8 ventral roots of baboons. Conduction velocities were measured antidromically by stimulating the muscle nerve and recording from the filaments, and fell into two groups: a fast (49-84 m/sec) and a slow (22-41m/sec), presumably fusimotor group. The threshold for these latter axons exceeded the strength needed to elicit the maximal motor twitch.2. Stimulation of ventral root filaments containing slow axons produced no contractile tension in EDC.3. Stimulation of ventral root filaments containing fast-group axons elicited all-or-nothing twitches of motor units of EDC. The twitch tensions of 66.3% of the units were < 2.0 g wt.; only 8.7% were > 5.0 g wt. Tetanus-twitch ratios were 1.4-4.7 in a sample of 14 units. Contraction times were between 15 and 35 msec in 97% of the units. There was no correlation between contractile properties and axonal conduction velocity.4. Afferent volleys from the stimulated EDC nerve were recorded from C6 or C7 dorsal roots. The threshold was below the threshold for a just-detectable motor twitch in ten out of eleven baboons. Conduction velocity of the earliest component of the muscle afferent volley was 67-83 m/sec.5. The conduction velocities of twenty-eight spindle afferents, identified by their responses to linear stretches of EDC and by their unloading by maximal twitches, were all < 70 m/sec. Higher dynamic sensitivity tended to be associated with higher conduction velocity.

1. The corticospinal connexions that are responsible for the firing of fusimotor impulses at short latency in response to brief, high-frequency stimulation of the baboon's motor cortex have been investigated by micro-electrode recording from antidromically identified fusimotor neurones of the forearm and hand.2. Of nineteen fusimotor neurones investigated by intracellular recording, six showed EPSPs at monosynaptic latency.3. In extracellular records, the latency of firing of an early fusimotor impulse was always too long to be explained by monosynaptic excitation by the corticospinal D volley, but could be explained by monosynaptic excitation from an I volley.4. Four of the nineteen intracellularly recorded fusimotor neurones showed short-latency (?disynaptic) IPSPs in response to brief high frequency cortical bursts.

1. The precentral and postcentral banks of the Rolandic fissure of the arm area of the baboon's cortex have been probed to their depths with extracellular micro-electrodes under nitrous oxide and oxygen anaesthesia, supplemented by minimal intravenous pentobarbitone or chloralose.2. Afferent volleys were sent in from the deep (motor) radial nerve and the deep palmar (motor) branch of the ulnar nerve. Their entry into the central nervous system was timed at the dorsal root entry zone. The nerves were stimulated in continuity and the effects of stimuli below threshold for the motor axons were investigated.3. Area 3a, in the depths of the postcentral bank, which is cytoarchitectonically transitional between areas 3 and 4, is the receiving area for afferent impulses from muscle.4. Evoked potential waves and unitary discharges began 4 msec, and the majority of units discharged between 5 and 10 msec, after the afferent volley reached the dorsal root entry zone.5. Similar responses were elicited by a brief pull (70 mu in 1 msec) or brief vibration (50 mu at 250-400 Hz) applied to the tendons of m. extensor digitorum communis.6. No potential waves were evoked in area 4, even in the depths adjacent to area 3a, by muscle afferent volleys.