1. Early implant failure: a retrospective analysis of contributing factors
- Author
-
Hyun-Seung Shin, Myeong-Jin Kim, In-Woo Cho, Sung-Jo Lee, Dae-Young Kang, Jordi Caballé-Serrano, and Jung-Chul Park
- Subjects
0206 medical engineering ,Dentistry ,02 engineering and technology ,Osseointegration ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Interquartile range ,Medicine ,Bone regeneration ,Prospective cohort study ,business.industry ,Proportional hazards model ,Hazard ratio ,Dental implants ,Implant failure ,030206 dentistry ,020601 biomedical engineering ,Risk factors ,Operative surgical procedures ,Periodontics ,Implant ,Oral Surgery ,business ,Implant Science ,Research Article - Abstract
Purpose The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the prevalence of early implant failure using a single implant system and to identify the factors contributing to early implant failure. Methods Patients who received implant treatment with a single implant system (Luna®, Shinhung, Seoul, Korea) at Dankook University Dental Hospital from 2015 to 2017 were enrolled. The following data were collected for analysis: sex and age of the patient, seniority of the surgeon, diameter and length of the implant, position in the dental arch, access approach for sinus-floor elevation, and type of guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure. The effect of each predictor was evaluated using the crude hazard ratio and the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) in univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, respectively. Results This study analyzed 1,031 implants in 409 patients, who comprised 169 females and 240 males with a median age of 54 years (interquartile range [IQR], 47–61 years) and were followed up for a median of 7.2 months (IQR, 5.6–9.9 months) after implant placement. Thirty-five implants were removed prior to final prosthesis delivery, and the cumulative survival rate in the early phase at the implant level was 95.6%. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that seniority of the surgeon (residents: aHR=2.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37–5.94) and the jaw in which the implant was placed (mandible: aHR=2.31; 95% CI, 1.12–4.76) exerted statistically significant effects on early implant failure after adjusting for sex, age, dimensions of the implant, and type of GBR procedure (preoperative and/or simultaneous) (P, Graphical Abstract
- Published
- 2019