1. Does biofeedback therapy improve quality of life in children with lower urinary tract dysfunction: parents' perspective
- Author
-
Giray Ergin, Yusuf Kibar, Turgay Ebiloglu, and Burak Kopru
- Subjects
Male ,Parents ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,Urology ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Urinary system ,Dysfunctional voiding ,030232 urology & nephrology ,Biofeedback ,behavioral disciplines and activities ,Hospital records ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Quality of life ,Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms ,030225 pediatrics ,Medicine ,Humans ,Child ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,digestive, oral, and skin physiology ,Treatment options ,Biofeedback, Psychology ,Urination Disorders ,humanities ,body regions ,Treatment Outcome ,Child, Preschool ,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health ,Physical therapy ,Quality of Life ,Female ,Biofeedback therapy ,business ,Attitude to Health ,psychological phenomena and processes ,Voiding Disorders - Abstract
Summary Introduction Lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) is a situation that often disrupts the quality of life (QoL) of both the child and the family with daytime and nighttime incontinence. Although the first-line treatment option for children with LUTD is standard urotherapy, biofeedback therapy can be performed in children in which standard urotherapy failed. Objective We studied the biofeedback success in children with LUTD according to parents' expressions. Methods We retrospectively analyzed our hospital records of children who were diagnosed with LUTD between 2005 and 2017. In total, 281 patients, refractory to standard urotherapy were included into the study and directed to biofeedback treatment. Their parents completed the dysfunctional voiding symptom scores (DVSS) before and after biofeedback therapy. Results At the end of the six-month follow-up period, all voiding disorders and voiding patterns were evaluated. According to DVSS, QoL tools before biofeedback treatment 48 (17%) parents appraised that LUTD caused no effect in their children's daily life, 104 (37.8%) expressed little effect, 89 (31%) moderate effect, and 40 (14.2%) serious effect. And, 120 (43%) parents expressed no effect, 95 (34%) little effect, 51 (18%) moderate effect, and 15 (5%) serious effect (P = 0.001) after biofeedback therapy. Biofeedback therapy affected positively the daily life of LUTD's family. The less serious the effect of LUTD on these children's family, the more success rate of biofeedback therapy. The effect of biofeedback therapy was less successful in moderated and serious affected families. Conclusions Biofeedback treatment is a non-invasive and effective treatment modality for improving the QoL for LUTD families who were less suffered from LUTD. Summary Table . Quality of life results before and after biofeedback therapy (%). Before biofeedback n = 281 After biofeedback n = 281 No effect 48 (17%) 120 (43%) Little effect 104 (37%) 95 (34%) Moderated effect 89 (31%) 51 (18%) Serious effect 40 (14%) 15 (5%)
- Published
- 2019