Search

Background: Preoperative advance care planning (ACP) may benefit patients undergoing major surgery. Objective: To evaluate feasibility, safety, and early effectiveness of video-based ACP in a surgical population. Design: Randomized controlled trial with two study arms. Setting: Single, academic, inner-city tertiary care hospital. Subjects: Patients undergoing major cancer surgery were recruited from nine surgical clinics. Of 106 consecutive potential participants, 103 were eligible and 92 enrolled. Interventions: In the intervention arm, patients viewed an ACP video developed by patients, surgeons, palliative care clinicians, and other stakeholders. In the control arm, patients viewed an informational video about the hospital's surgical program. Measurements: Primary Outcomes—ACP content and patient-centeredness in patient–surgeon preoperative conversation. Secondary outcomes—patient Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score; patient goals of care; patient and surgeon satisfaction; video helpfulness; and medical decision maker designation. Results: Ninety-two patients (target enrollment: 90) were enrolled. The ACP video was successfully integrated with no harm noted. Patient-centeredness was unchanged (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.06, confidence interval [0.87–1.3], p = 0.545), although there were more ACP discussions in the intervention arm (23% intervention vs. 10% control, p = 0.18). While slightly underpowered, study results did not signal that further enrollment would have yielded statistical significance. There were no differences in secondary outcomes other than the intervention video was more helpful (p = 0.007). Conclusions: The ACP video was successfully integrated into surgical care without harm and was thought to be helpful, although video content did not significantly change the ACP content or patient–surgeon communication. Future studies could increase the ACP dose through modifying video content and/or who presents ACP. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT02489799. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: African Americans in the United States have worse end-of-life care and cancer outcomes than whites. Palliative care may improve this disparity. Community Health Workers may provide a means to improve palliative care disparities. Methods: Semistructured in-depth interviews (five) and stakeholder focus groups (four) were conducted with cancer patients, caregivers, health care administrators, oncologists, and community health workers (CHWs). Patients were recruited through snowball sampling. Three raters coded interviews independently. Data were analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Results: Seventy-one individuals were contacted to participate with 24 stakeholders (34%) participating in individual interviews or across 4 stakeholder engagements. Eleven constructs were identified and grouped in three broader themes: "hub of the wheel," understanding palliative care, and patient–provider relationships. Participants felt that the role of a CHW should be central, bridging patients with their providers, information, and resources, including psychosocial support and advance care planning documents. They also placed an emphasis on the background of CHWs, saying individuals selected should be familiar with the history, culture, and norms of the communities from which they operate. Stakeholders reported that a CHW could activate a patient to contact their primary care physician or oncologist who may refer to or provide palliative care. Stakeholders reported that given the barriers to palliative care, a CHW could contribute to patient-centered multidisciplinary care while addressing palliative care domains with patients and families in a culturally sensitive manner. Conclusion: Based on feedback from patients, caregivers, and providers, a culturally adapted CHW intervention may improve palliative care use for African American patients with advanced malignancies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) methods and social learning theory (SLT) require intensive interaction between researchers and stakeholders. Advance care planning (ACP) is valuable before major surgery, but a systematic review found no extant perioperative ACP tools. Consequently, PCOR methods and SLT can inform the development of an ACP educational video for patients and families preparing for major surgery. Objective: The objective is to develop and test acceptability of an ACP video storyline. Design: The design is a stakeholder-guided development of the ACP video storyline. Design-thinking methods explored and prioritized stakeholder perspectives. Patients and family members evaluated storyboards containing the proposed storyline. Setting/Subjects: The study was conducted at hospital outpatient surgical clinics, in-person stakeholder summit, and the 2014 Maryland State Fair. Measurements: Measurements are done through stakeholder engagement and deidentified survey. Results: Stakeholders evaluated and prioritized evidence from an environmental scan. A surgeon, family member, and palliative care physician team iteratively developed a script featuring 12 core themes and worked with a medical graphic designer to translate the script into storyboards. For 10 days, 359 attendees of the 2014 Maryland State Fair evaluated the storyboards and 87% noted that they would be 'very comfortable' or 'comfortable' seeing the storyboard before major surgery, 89% considered the storyboards 'very helpful' or 'helpful,' and 89% would 'definitely recommend' or 'recommend' this story to others preparing for major surgery. Conclusions: Through an iterative process utilizing diverse PCOR engagement methods and informed by SLT, storyboards were developed for an ACP video. Field testing revealed the storyline to be highly meaningful for surgery patients and family members. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Palliative care provides open and honest communication, medically appropriate goal setting, and meticulous attention to symptom assessment and control. The Physicians Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) is a growing movement to allow health care providers to indicate, with their patients, what they want done in specific situations, such as feeding tubes, mechanical ventilation, or transfer to an intensive care unit. We have developed an internal signout tool used by palliative medicine fellows in our institution to specify similar interventions—or not—with seriously ill palliative care patients, the Providers Signout for Scope of Treatment (PSOST). We have found that this situation-specific tool enables smooth transitions of care on nights and weekends, especially when the patient is near death, and may help prevent both overescalation of care and underuse of life saving treatments such as resuscitation. The PSOST differs from other signout tools in that it gives clear direction regarding the patient's medical goals and desire for escalation of care, or not. We present it here for open access and use anywhere. This tool has also assisted in building team communication with the nursing shifts, especially nights and weekends, as all team members are able to deliver a consistent message, while meeting the goals of care for patients and families. We believe this tool could be useful with a broader patient population, outside of Palliative Medicine, to provide clearer direction for hospitalized or nursing home patients whose care is often directed by multiple providers. It could also be used as a template for signouts on other inpatient services, as care goals are important for all patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the findings of a review identifying patients with metastatic solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, who were admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) and expired inpatient between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018. Topics covered include the criteria for patient inclusion in the review, results which show that only a minority of patients discussed goals of care or code status with their outpatient oncologists and that few engage in advance care planning.