Search

Context Terminally ill patients (TIP) frequently visit the emergency department (ED), but the prevalence of these visits is unclear. Objective To determine the prevalence of TIP visiting the ED. Methods Systematic review of observational studies published between 1998 and 2018 reporting adults TIP who used the hospital ED, searching in PubMed, CINAHL, SciELO, LILACS, and Cochrane. Three evaluators selected and extracted data (kappa concordance 0.63). The quality of the studies was evaluated with the Newcastle–Ottawa scale and global estimates were made, calculating combined prevalence (95% confidence interval [CI]) and heterogeneity of the studies (I2). Results We identified 2429 publications, ultimately including 31 studies in 14 countries; 79% were from high-income countries, 21% from medium-income countries, and none from low-income countries. Most were from 2015. We found that 45% of patients with cancer visited the ED in the last month of life [95% CI 37–54%] and 75% in the last six months of life [95% CI 62–83%]; I2 = 100%. Overall, 17% of patients who visited the ED had a terminal illness [95% CI 12–23%]; I2 = 98%. Few studies reported terminal nononcologic illness, specific age groups or diseases, hospital admission rates, use of palliative care or nonresuscitation, or other criteria that could be used for grouping. Conclusions Patients with terminal cancer frequently use the ED at the end of life, although use varies among patients and few studies have examined low-income countries or patients with nononcologic terminal illness. The global prevalence of TIP in the ED cannot be calculated from limited reports.

What a privilege it is to be able to touch those sacred spaces in the soul of each person that we encounter everyday. Patients with life-threatening illnesses can struggle with physical, emotional, and existential and spiritual concerns and the suffering of caregivers. A key goal of our supportive and palliative care teams is to alleviate patient and caregiver suffering. When caring for patients with advanced and terminal illness, the spirituality of each member of the palliative care team becomes a single collective spirituality or soul with common goals, values, and belonging, with a main goal of providing the best care for patients and caregivers in the alleviation of suffering. Embracing the spiritual care into our daily practice is a common effort and a service provided by each member of the team. Our role as members of the collective soul is to preserve human dignity and raise up the broken souls of patients living with life-threatening illness by creating healing environments.

Understanding cancer patients' preferences in decisional roles is important in providing quality care and ensuring patient satisfaction. There is a lack of evidence on decisional control preferences (DCPs) of Hispanic Americans, the fastest growing population in the U.S.The primary aims of this study were to describe DCPs of Hispanics with advanced cancer in the U.S. (HUSs) and compare the frequency of passive DCPs in this population with that of Hispanics with advanced cancer in Latin America (HLAs).We conducted a prospective survey of patients with advanced cancer referred to outpatient palliative care clinics in the U.S., Chile, Argentina, and Guatemala. Information was collected on sociodemographic variables, Karnofsky Performance Scale scores, acculturation (Marin Acculturation Assessment Tool), and DCP (Control Preference Scale). Chi-square tests were used to determine the differences in DCPs between HUSs and HLAs.A total of 387 patients were surveyed: 91 in the U.S., 100 in Chile, 94 in Guatemala, and 99 in Argentina. The median age of HUSs was 56 years, 59% were female, and the median Karnofsky Performance Scale score was 60; the corresponding values for HLAs were 60 years, 60%, and 80. HLAs used passive DCP strategies significantly more frequently than HUSs did with regard to the involvement of the family (24% vs. 10%; P=0.009) or the physician (35% vs. 16%; P0.001), even after age and education were controlled for. Eighty-three percent of HUSs and 82% of HLAs preferred family involvement in decision making (P=non-significant). No significant differences were found in DCPs between poorly and highly acculturated HUSs (P=0.91).HUSs had more active DCPs than HLAs did. Among HUSs, acculturation did not seem to play a role in DCP determination. Our findings confirm the importance of family participation for both HUSs and HLAs. However, HUSs were less likely to want family members to make decisions on their behalf.

Spirituality, religiosity, and spiritual pain may affect advanced cancer patients' symptom expression, coping strategies, and quality of life.To examine the prevalence and intensity of spirituality, religiosity, and spiritual pain, and how spiritual pain was associated with symptom expression, coping, and spiritual quality of life.We interviewed 100 advanced cancer patients at the M.D. Anderson palliative care outpatient clinic in Houston, TX. Self-rated spirituality, religiosity, and spiritual pain were assessed using numeric rating scales (0=lowest, 10=highest). Patients also completed validated questionnaires assessing symptoms (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS] and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), coping (Brief COPE and Brief R-COPE), the value attributed by the patient to spirituality/religiosity in coping with cancer (Systems of Belief Inventory-15R), and spiritual quality of life (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being-Expanded [FACIT-Sp-Ex]).The median age was 53 years (range 21-85) and 88% were Christians. Almost all patients considered themselves spiritual (98%) and religious (98%), with a median intensity of 9 (interquartile range 7-10) of 10 and 9 (range 5-10) of 10, respectively. Spiritual pain was reported in 40 (44%) of 91 patients, with a median score of 3 (1-6) among those with spiritual pain. Spiritual pain was significantly associated with lower self-perceived religiosity (7 vs. 10, P=0.002) and spiritual quality of life (FACIT-Sp-Ex 68 vs. 81, P=0.001). Patients with spiritual pain reported that it contributed adversely to their physical/emotional symptoms (P0.001). There was a trend toward increased depression, anxiety, anorexia, and drowsiness, as measured by the ESAS, among patients with spiritual pain (P0.05), although this was not significant after Bonferroni correction.A vast majority of advanced cancer patients receiving palliative care considered themselves spiritual and religious. Spiritual pain was common and was associated with lower self-perceived religiosity and spiritual quality of life.

Admissions to the emergency department (ED) can be distressing to patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care. There is limited research about the clinical characteristics of these patients and whether these ED visits can be categorized as avoidable or unavoidable.To determine the frequency of potentially avoidable ED visits (AvEDs) for patients with advanced cancer receiving outpatient palliative care in a large tertiary cancer center, identify the clinical characteristics of the patients receiving palliative care who visited the ED, and analyze the factors associated with AvEDs and unavoidable ED visits (UnAvEDs).We randomly selected 200 advanced cancer patients receiving treatment in the outpatient palliative care clinic of a tertiary cancer center who visited the ED between January 2010 and December 2011. Visits were classified as AvED (if the problem could have been managed in the outpatient clinic or by telephone) or UnAvED.Forty-six (23%) of 200 ED visits were classified as AvED, and 154 (77%) of 200 ED visits were classified as UnAvED. Pain (71/200, 36%) was the most common chief complaint in both groups. Altered mental status, dyspnea, fever, and bleeding were present in the UnAvED group only. Infection, neurologic events, and cancer-related dyspnea were significantly more frequent in the UnAvED group, whereas constipation and running out of pain medications were significantly more frequent in the AvED group (P0.001). In a multivariate analysis, AvED was associated with nonwhite ethnicity (odds ratio [OR] 2.66; 95% CI 1.26, 5.59) and constipation (OR 17.08; 95% CI 3.76, 77.67), whereas UnAvED was associated with ED referral from the outpatient oncology or palliative care clinic (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.06, 0.88) and the presence of baseline dyspnea (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.21, 0.99).Nearly one-fourth of ED visits by patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care were potentially avoidable. Proactive efforts to improve communication and support between scheduled appointments are needed.

Sleep disturbance (SD) is a significant source of distress for patients with cancer. Studies of patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care to identify symptoms associated with the severity of SD are limited.In this study, we sought to identify the symptoms measured by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) that are associated with SD, as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Secondary aims of the study were to determine the association between occurrences of SD with occurrences of other symptoms and screening performance of the ESAS-Sleep item against the PSQI.We reviewed the completed ESAS and PSQI assessments of 101 patients with advanced cancer who were receiving palliative care and had been admitted to prospective clinical trials previously initiated by us. Patients with a PSQI score of ≥ 5 were considered to have an SD. The frequency and severity of the ESAS symptoms items, their correlation with each other, the PSQI score, and the screening performance of the ESAS-Sleep item were calculated.The median age of patients was 60 years. Most were white non-Hispanic (73%), had lung or breast cancer (41%), and were diagnosed with SD (85%). The PSQI score was correlated with the ESAS items of pain (r=0.27, P=0.006), dyspnea (r=0.25, P0.001), well-being (r=0.35, P0.0001), and sleep (r=0.44, P0.0001). Compared with patients without SD, those with SD were more likely to report pain (P=0.0132), depression (P=0.019), anxiety (P=0.01), and a poorer sense of well-being (P=0.035). An ESAS-Sleep item cutoff score of ≥ 3 (of 10) resulted in a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 73%.SD is associated with increased frequency of pain, depression, anxiety, and a worse sense of well-being. These four symptoms should be assessed in all patients with advanced cancer with a complaint of SD. The ideal cutoff point of the ESAS-Sleep item for screening for SD is a score of ≥ 3. More research is needed to better characterize this frequent and distressing syndrome.

Delirium is considered to be multifactorial, especially in elderly patients and those with advanced cancer, and can cause significant distress. High baseline vulnerability at the end of life, combined with cachexia, hepatic impairment, general comorbidities, and impaired functional status, can make delirium difficult to correct. Nonetheless, approximately 50% of delirium episodes are potentially reversible and reversible causes should be investigated. Hypercalcemia is one of the reversible metabolic causes of delirium in patients with advanced cancer. Here, we present the case of a patient with metastatic small cell prostate carcinoma who presented to our palliative care clinic with uncontrolled symptoms. A thorough evaluation using appropriate assessment tools revealed that he had delirium, and hypercalcemia was found to be the major etiologic factor. An interdisciplinary team approach (including a nutritionist, pharmacist, counselor, social worker, chaplain, and case manager) was provided. With aggressive symptom management and correction of hypercalcemia and other reversible causes of delirium, the delirium was resolved and the symptoms were controlled. This case illustrates the importance of screening for delirium in patients with severe symptom distress and how the interdisciplinary management of reversible causes of delirium, including hypercalcemia, can improve patients' symptoms and quality of life.

The Impact of Spirituality, Religiosity, and Spiritual Pain in Coping Strategies and Quality of Life (QOL) of Caregivers of Advanced Cancer Patients (CACP) in the Palliative Care (PC) Setting (717) Marvin Delgado-Guay, MD, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX. Henrique Parsons, MD, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. David Hui, MD MSc FRCPC, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Maxine De La Cruz, MD, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Kathy Govan University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Eduardo Bruera, MD, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Steve Thorney. (All speakers have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.)