Search

Physical symptoms such as pain and cancer-related fatigue limit physical function and activities of daily living among patients with terminal cancer, which can lead to a decline in quality of life. Therefore, comprehensive functional impairments should be evaluated to determine the progression of the disease and the effectiveness of palliative treatment. To validate the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Edmonton Functional Assessment Tool 2 (EFAT2-J). We developed a Japanese version of the EFAT-2 in accordance with international guidelines. To verify the reliability and validity of the EFAT2-J, patients were evaluated by a physiotherapist and a nurse separately, and correlations with existing evaluation scales for physical function, physical symptoms, and quality of life were analyzed, respectively. The significance level was set at 5%. Twenty patients participated in the reliability measurement. The average EFAT2-J scores were 7.95 ± 4.12 for physical therapists and 7.20 ± 4.23 for nurses, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.95. The weighted kappa coefficient (κ) for each item was 0.57–1.00. Fifty-five patients participated in the validity measurement. The EFAT2-J showed significant correlations with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status and the Karnofsky Performance Scale, Barthel Index, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 15-Palliative Care sub-item "physical function." These results indicate that the EFAT2-J has robust psychometric properties and is useful for evaluating physical function in patients with terminal cancer, and thus may be an acceptable clinical instrument in research and practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To examine the prevalence, severity, and co-occurrence of SPPADE symptoms as well as their association with cancer type and patient characteristics. The SPPADE symptoms (sleep disturbance, pain, physical function impairment, anxiety, depression, and low energy /fatigue) are prevalent, co-occurring, and undertreated in oncology and other clinical populations. Baseline SPPADE symptom data were analyzed from the E2C2 study, a stepped wedge pragmatic, population-level, cluster randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate a guideline-informed symptom management model targeting the six SPPADE symptoms. Symptom prevalence and severity were measured with a 0–10 numeric rating (NRS) scale for each of the six symptoms. Prevalence of severe (NRS ≥ 7) and potential clinically relevant (NRS ≥ 5) symptoms as well as co-occurrence of clinical symptoms were determined. Distribution-based methods were used to estimate the minimally important difference (MID). Associations of cancer type and patient characteristics with a SPPADE composite score were analyzed. A total of 31,886 patients were assessed for SPPADE symptoms prior to, during, or soon after an outpatient medical oncology encounter. The proportion of patients with a potential clinically relevant symptom ranged from 17.5% for depression to 33.4% for fatigue. Co-occurrence of symptoms was high, with the proportion of patients with three or more additional clinically relevant symptoms ranging from 45.2% for fatigue to 68.6% for depression. The summed SPPADE composite score demonstrated good internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha of 0.86), with preliminary MID estimates of 4.1–4.3. Symptom burden differed across several types of cancer but was generally similar across most sociodemographic characteristics. The high prevalence and co-occurrence of SPPADE symptoms in patients with all types of cancer warrants clinical approaches that optimize detection and management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is associated with recurrent pain that could lead to abnormal sensory patterns (ASPs).Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare children with SCD who had normal sensory patterns (NSPs) and ASPs in pain experience, physical function, pain coping, and pain catastrophizing.Methods: Children with quantitative sensory testing data were selected from a larger study that examined pain and symptoms in children with SCD. Comparisons were made between children with NSP (n = 35; 13.9 ± 1.9 years) and ASP (n = 13; 12.8 ± 1.9 years). Children completed the Adolescent Pediatric Pain Tool, Functional Disability Inventory, Pain Coping Questionnaire, and Pain Catastrophizing Scale.Results: No significant differences were found in pain intensity (2.9 ± 3.0 vs. 2.6 ± 2.8 on 0-10 Visual Analogue Scale) between the NSP and ASP, respectively. The most common marked pain sites for both groups were lower extremities (22.9%), head and neck (20.8%), and upper extremities (20.8%). Functional Disability Inventory scores were significantly worse in ASP (38.5%) compared with NSP (11.4%). The ASP group had significantly worse scores in emotion-focused pain coping subscales.Conclusion: Children with SCD with ASP had worse functional disability, were expressing more affective pain quality, and had emotion-focused pain coping compared with NSP. Future studies are needed to examine the effectiveness of physical activities on the physical function as well as psychosocial interventions such as peer support and creative arts expression to minimize development of ASP in children with SCD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]