Search

Over the past two decades, opioid use and overdose have increased substantially. Naloxone, an opioid overdose reversal agent, has been one of many risk mitigation strategies for preventing mortality due to overdose. Most literature describing naloxone utilization has been about populations of illicit drug users and patients in hospitals, primary care, and pharmacies. There is limited information regarding naloxone prescribing and training for opioid users in specialty pain management clinics. Furthermore, there are no known publications concerning patients receiving palliative care services and overdose prevention. Pain and palliative care patients are commonly at risk of opioid overdose. In an interdisciplinary outpatient pain and palliative care clinic, pharmacists implemented naloxone prescribing and education. Eleven patients at increased risk for overdose were prescribed naloxone and educated on overdose risk factors, recognition, and management. Seven patients reported picking up their naloxone prescription from the pharmacy, and none reported using it within two weeks of the initial education. This intervention was deemed successful within the clinic, but small sample size and the pharmacist role may not be replicable within other pain and palliative care settings. It encourages further research of overdose risk and prevention in pain management and palliative care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The mainstay of treatment in advanced cancer pain is opioids; however, non-opioid medications such as acetaminophen continue to be included in guidelines despite a lack of clear, convincing evidence for their use. The aim of our study was to determine if acetaminophen improves pain control or reduces opioid utilization in hospitalized patients receiving strong opioids for cancer pain managed by the palliative care consult service (PCCS). We carried out at single-center retrospective cohort study of 194 adult cancer patients seen by the PCCS and who received strong opioids. Patients who received acetaminophen during their admission were compared to those who did not. The primary outcome was a 30% reduction in average daily pain score from admission to discharge using a numeric rating scale. There was no difference between groups in achieving a 30% reduction in pain (35.8% vs. 35.4%, adjusted odds ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46 to 1.63). Acetaminophen was associated with a longer LOS (8 days vs. 6 days, adjusted relative risk 1.67, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.15). In this study of cancer patients receiving strong opioids, acetaminophen use was not associated with improved pain control or reduced opioid utilization, but was associated with a greater LOS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pain is a common symptom leading to referrals to specialized home palliative care (SHPC) services and is known to affect patients' quality of life. To date, little is known about the impact of referral source on its management. To assess changes to pain medication profile in the course of SHPC and to identify potential differences in relation to referral source. This exploratory study is a retrospective analysis of 501 electronic medical records of a SHPC team in Germany. This included the assessment of baseline pain medication profiles according to the WHO analgesic ladder and changes to analgesic treatment in the course of SHPC with respect to referral source. At the time of admission, 77.4% of patients referred by a hospital and 78.8% of patients referred by the outpatient sector received a fixed analgesic regimen. In all, 61.9% of the inpatient group versus 62.9% of the outpatient group were treated with opioids, and 79.0% received modifications to pain medication at one point in time following admission. Thereby, patients referred by the outpatient sector received significantly earlier modifications and more supplementations of pain medication. Our study suggests positive development in the prescription of opioid analgesics compared to earlier studies in Germany. On the one hand, it highlights the relevance of thorough assessment and responsive evaluation of pain in SHPC, and on the other hand it reveals possible training needs of referring physicians, particularly those working in the outpatient sector. Our results inspired further research examining more closely the links between referral source and pain management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite the existence of protocols for effective pain control, pediatric pain is still high, due to scarce knowledge of its treatment, especially regarding opioids. This study aimed to evaluate doctors and nurses' knowledge of pain treatment and the use of opioids in children, before and after the implementation of Law 38/2010, that represented an important step in guaranteeing patients' rights to gain access to appropriate services for pain control and palliative care in Italy and in establishing the obligation of specific training programs in this matter for health professionals. An ad hoc questionnaire was developed and administered before (investigation A) and after (investigation B) the issuance of the Law. In B both doctors and nurses showed a slight but significant increase in correct answers and a reduction in incorrect ones, mainly concerning the category Myths and Prejudices. In both investigations doctors and nurses showed adequate general knowledge, yet there were some gaps regarding the specific knowledge of opioid drugs. Most of the participants were not familiar with the Law and its provisions. Investigation B showed an improvement in health professionals' knowledge, perhaps due to a hospital environment that followed the provisions of Law 38/2010. Nevertheless, the establishment of training courses according to the Law is needed to improve the knowledge of opioids, as well as to dispel deeply rooted myths and prejudices on pediatric pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Opioids are often the foundation of pain management in seriously ill patients. Unfortunately, even experienced providers carry with them information that they consider "fact", when this information is not based on scientific evidence, but on "myth". Several topics were elicited based on common beliefs and misconceptions in clinical practice. These were identified via a survey of pharmacist pain and palliative care providers. Pearls from these topics were chosen that were based on evidence and would have the greatest bearing on clinical practice. The pearls address topics such as not using opioids as first-line analgesics for all types of pain, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, opioid risk management in cancer patients, use of buprenorphine in hospice and palliative care settings and use of naloxone in seriously ill patients. The pearls are supported by clinical evidence extracted from several references. They are intended to make readers give thought to opioid therapy which is strictly evidence-based, and not historical or anecdote-based. Practical recommendations are provided to give readers a starting point to base clinical decisions going forward. Readers may discover that "facts" they once learned about opioid use in seriously ill patients are actually "myths" that are a figment of the past. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Methadone has been effectively utilized in the palliative care setting as a second-line agent for pain management in cancer patients with refractory pain, or in those who cannot tolerate other opioid medications. The lack of reliable dosing ratios, substantial interindividual variability in methadone pharmacodynamics, the potential for extensive drug interactions, and the high potency of methadone compared with other opioids all pose significant barriers to the use of this drug in routine practice. This article describes a novel approach to methadone conversion, with case studies providing preliminary validation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 58-year-old male with chronic pancreatitis was seen by the palliative care service for pain and agitation related to a recent diagnosis of disseminated abdominal cancer. Increasing symptom burden, including pain and nausea, in the face of escalating doses of multiple opioid and sedative medications resulted in the addition of dexmedetomidine to successfully control his symptoms. Visceral sensitization related to his chronic pancreatitis likely increased his pain perception and required a multimodal approach to control his symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The authors investigated the treatment outcome of patients with severe interstitial pneumonia (IP) who received opioids during end-of-life care. Twenty-two consecutive patients were retrospectively evaluated before and after continuous administration of opioids for 24 hours. All subjects died within 21 days; the mean survival period after opioid administration was 5.6 days. Six of the 22 patients (27%) died within 24 hours after opioids were initiated. In the other 16 patients, respiratory rate was significantly decreased after opioid use and there was a small, nonsignificant improvement in dyspnea measured by the Borg scale without adequate evaluation and records ( n = 6). However, hypercapnia with over 10 mm Hg of Paco2 developed in two patients. Paco2 tended to be elevated after opioid use in all patients, although the change was not significant. An extremely poor outcome was attributable to the disease progression of IP in six of the patients with Pao2/FIo2 levels below 100. The other 16 patients showed both positive and negative effects as expected. Clinicians should assess dyspnea prior to opioid administration, since the purpose of the opioid administration is to relieve dyspnea. Dyspnea should be monitored and recorded in routine clinical practice, at least after hospitalization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents 2012 news on drugs. The U.S.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced in July that methadone contributed to more than 30% of painkiller overdoses. Research in the article "Periconceptional Over-the-Counter Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Exposure and Risk for Spontaneous Abortion" by D. R. V. Edwards found that the drugs do not increase the risk of abortion. In July of 2012 Eli Lilly & Company stated that it had six months of U.S. marketing exclusivity.

The article presents 2012 news related to pain and palliative care. The Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York is conducting research on the palliative care needs of emergency department patients with advanced cancer. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a drug safety communication on March 28th on a risk of cardiac arrhythmia linked to the drug citalopram. The National Institute of Nursing Research has published a Spanish language version of its brochure on palliative care.

The article offers news briefs. A U.S. national survey sponsored by the American Pain Foundation revealed physicians' misperceptions about the misuse and abuse of opioids by patients. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA’s) Advisory Committee rejected a proposed risk mitigation and evaluation strategy (REMS) supported by the American Pain Society (APS). A study by German researchers investigating pain in hospital patients revealed poor pain control in German hospitals.

The author reflects on the risks and benefits of opioid availability. He suggests that several organizations, including the World Health Organization, deserve congratulations for bringing increased attention to the issue of opioid availability. He argues that there is a need for further consideration of how the balance between the risks and benefits of opioid availability can best be established.