Search

BACKGROUND Although orthopaedic trauma occurs at higher rates in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), most research on this topic is conducted in high-resource settings. Few initiatives exist to promote local research in LMICs. Investigators created the Institute for Global Orthopaedics and Traumatology (IGOT) International Research Symposium to promote local research initiatives by surgeons practicing in low-resource environments. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of this symposium in teaching orthopaedic surgeons practicing in LMICs how to conduct clinical research. METHODS In this prospective observational study, orthopaedic surgeons from LMICs with no formal research training were recruited to attend the 1-day IGOT International Research Symposium in San Francisco. A survey was administered immediately before and after the symposium to inquire about the participants' confidence in different aspects related to research using a 1-5 Likert scale. A second survey, conducted 2 years later, recorded the attendees' research productivity after the workshop. RESULTS Forty-three participants representing 10 different LMICs from Africa and Asia attended the 2013 course. At 2 year postcourse, participants reported starting 25 research projects, authored 7 "accepted or published manuscripts" (vs. 1 before the course; P < 0.01), and were selected for 12 podium or poster presentations (vs. 3 before the course; P < 0.01). Two research symposium attendees received "Top International Forum Paper" at the 2015 Orthopaedic Trauma Association Annual Meeting. DISCUSSION A 1-day research course resulted in increased participant confidence in conducting research. This was associated with greater research productivity by participants 2 years later. These results suggest that the IGOT International Research Symposium can improve the number of initiated research projects by surgeons in LMICs.

INTRODUCTION Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) experience a large volume of orthopaedic trauma, but limited research exists to evaluate effective treatments using locally available means. Academic partners can help design and implement research studies through collaborative efforts with local investigators. We will describe the study design and lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial in Tanzania comparing outcomes of 2 operative treatments for open tibia fractures. STUDY DESIGN The Institute for Global Orthopaedics and Traumatology at the University of California, San Francisco, and the Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, partnered to design a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Adult patients with open tibia fractures were randomized to receive either intramedullary nailing or external fixation as definitive fixation. Our primary outcome was the rate of reoperation, and secondary outcomes included EQ-5D, pain, function, radiographic union, and return to work. RESULTS We enrolled 40 patients in a pilot study that informed improvements in the study design and standard operating procedures. These modifications included development of a specific outline of the technical standards for each surgical intervention and held training workshops to disseminate this knowledge among operative surgeons. This resulted in the successful enrollment and standardized treatment of our target sample of 240 patients. DISCUSSION There are several challenges in conducting high-quality, international research. Keys for success include maintaining a strong relationship between partners, having local research coordinators, simplifying data collection and storage, and incentivizing patients to attend follow-up visits.

Purpose: There are an estimated 1.2 million deaths from road traffic injuries annually, disproportionately affecting patients in low- resource settings. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify knowledge gaps in global orthopaedic trauma in an effort to help prioritize future research. Methods: Using the 6-stage Arksey and O’Malley framework for conducting a scoping review, orthopaedic trauma literature was reviewed over a ten-year period from 2004 to 2014. Studies from low-resource settings were included and categorized by geographic location, anatomic region, study type, and level of evidence. Results: Of 548 included studies, 51.4% were from low- and middle-income countries in South Asia and 33.7% were from sub- Saharan Africa. Therapeutic (53.3%), epidemiologic (26.4%), and qualitative (8.9%) studies were most common. Only 10.2% of the studies were considered high level of evidence, whereas the vast majority (89.8%) was level 3 or below. Overall, lower extremity injuries were much more frequently represented in the literature compared with upper extremity injuries (233 vs. 78). Pelvic and acetabular fractures were the least studied anatomic region of the lower extremity (3.4%). Conclusions: Our study identified a lack of cost-effectiveness analyses pertaining to injury and intervention, paucity of high- quality research, and under-representation of pelvic, acetabular, and upper extremity injuries. Improved and prioritized research in low- and middle-income countries may help optimize care and inform policy makers of how to reduce the global burden of musculoskeletal trauma.