Search

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of routine postoperative computed topography (CT) scan after percutaneous fixation of unstable pelvic ring injuries. Design Retrospective chart review. Setting Level I Trauma Center. Patients/participants A total of 362 consecutive patients underwent operative fixation of unstable pelvic ring injuries during the study period. Intervention Postoperative CT scan of the pelvis was obtained in 331 (91%) of the 362 patients treated operatively for unstable pelvic ring injuries. Main outcome measurements Revision surgery based on routine postoperative CT scan. Results Two patients (0.55%) returned to the operating room on the basis of postoperative CT scans due to malpositioned implants. There were no significant differences of age, sex, body mass index, Injury Severity Score, mechanism of injury, smoking status, or diabetes status between those who did and did not undergo revision surgery. A dysmorphic pelvis was identified in 154 (47%) patients. Both patients undergoing revision surgery were determined to have a dysmorphic pelvis while no patients with normal pelvic anatomy returned to the operating room based on postoperative CT (2/154, 1.3% vs. 0/177, 0%, P = 0.22). Conclusions Although there remains a role for postoperative CT scans in the appropriately selected patient, in the hands of experienced orthopaedic traumatologists, patients with adequate intraoperative fluoroscopy and a nondysmorphic pelvis may not require routine postoperative three-dimensional imaging. Level of evidence Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Over the past 3 decades, the evolution of pelvic and acetabular surgery has been supported by the advances in intraoperative pelvic fluoroscopic imaging technology. The new Ziehm RFD 3D C-arm unit provides routine fluoroscopic pelvic imaging but also offers rapid and high-quality real-time axial, sagittal, and coronal intraoperative imaging. This technology allows the surgeon to accurately assess fracture reduction, loose body removal, and implant locations while the patient is still under anesthesia. In this way, any necessary corrections can be performed before the patient leaves the operating room. Essentially, this technology should eliminate the need for revision surgeries. In this report, we present our initial experience using this new device.

Objective Compare intraoperative "on end" fluoroscopy lag screw position to postoperative computer tomography. Design Retrospective review. Clinical setting Level 1 trauma center. Patients One hundred sixteen patients sustaining operative acetabular fractures with posterior wall components. Intervention Posterior wall lag screws placed using "on end" fluoroscopic imaging. Main outcome measurements The primary outcome was determining correlation between lag screw position, in relation to the acetabular articular margin, using intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative computer tomography. Analysis was performed based on location around the acetabulum, including posterior (P), superoposterior (SP), and superior (S) regions, and screws 0-5, 5-10, and >10 mm from the joint. Results Two hundred forty-four lag screws were identified as follows: 51.6% in the P group, 25.4% in SP, and 23.0% in the S group with excellent correlation noted in all groups. For screws pooled based on fluoroscopic distance from the joint, 28.3% were 0-5 mm, 52.9% 5.01-10 mm, and 18.4% >10 mm. Correlation coefficients were 0.60 for 0-5 mm and 0.68 for both groups >5 mm. Subdividing screws based on anatomic region and fluoroscopic location found increasing correlation as screws moved further from the joint in the P region. In the SP group, excellent correlation was noted for screws 0-5 mm with decreasing correlation further from the joint. Within the S group, correlation for screws 0-5 mm did not reach significance, but good correlation was noted for screws >5 mm. Overall incidence of intraarticular screws was 1.2%. Conclusions Intraoperative axial fluoroscopy for posterior wall lag screw placement correlates closely with postoperative computer tomography allowing for reliable posterior wall lag screw placement in all regions around the acetabulum. Care should be taken while placing lag screws within 5 mm of the articular surface, particularly within the posterior region.

Preoperative evaluation of the contralateral anatomic lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA) at our institution is used to judge coronal plane alignment. In our study, we investigated 4 different techniques for obtaining an anteroposterior intraoperative fluoroscopic image of the distal femur to determine which technique provides (1) the greatest interobserver reliability; (2) the lowest variability from the previously published population mean; and (3) the lowest side-to-side variability.Inclusion criteria included lower extremity injuries needing fixation that required intraoperative fluoroscopy with an intact femur and an intact extensor mechanism (N = 100). Fluoroscopic images were obtained of the distal femur in 4 positions differentiated by the position of the limb and the orientation of the C-arm beam to the femoral shaft.All measurement techniques resulted in mean measurements within one degree of 81 degrees. Variance between measurements was small among patients with all views, but images that involved a true anteroposterior with the beam perpendicular to the femur had the lowest rate of measurements that were78 or84 degrees.Side-to-side differences in patients were2 degrees on average with every image used. With the best-performing images, 20% of patients had an aLDFA3 degrees different from the population mean of 81 degrees and 3% of patients were5 degrees different. Although restoring aLDFA to 81 degrees will be within 3 degrees of the contralateral side the vast majority of the time, matching the aLDFA to the injured side will be the most accurate reconstruction.

Rotational malalignment after intramedullary (IM) nailing of femoral fractures remains a significant problem. A technique using intraoperative fluoroscopy and the anteversion inherent to the IM nail for obtaining appropriate femoral rotational alignment is presented. The technique is advocated as a simple alternative to more complex methods for estimation of femoral anteversion during placement of femoral IM nails. This method is simple and requires intraoperative fluoroscopy on the injured extremity alone. It reliably sets the femoral anteversion within a normal physiologic range with minimal additional intraoperative steps and without preoperative measurements.

To assess the utility of the dorsal tangential view (DTV) in detecting intraoperative dorsal screw penetration in distal radius fractures treated with volar locked plating.Retrospective cohort study.Academic level 1 trauma center.Skeletally mature patients where open reduction internal fixation with volar locked plating was the definitive treatment. A total of twenty-six patients were evaluated.Intraoperative anteroposterior, lateral, 20 degree tilted lateral, and DTVs were obtained through fluoroscopy in all wrists. Screw exchange and position by fluoroscopic view was recorded. A computed tomography (CT) was taken postoperatively to identify residual prominent screws.Data points included frequency of screw exchange by standard fluoroscopic views, the DTV, and residual prominent screws detected by CT.Eight constructs of thirty (27%) had prominent screws evident on the DTV but not seen on standard fluoroscopic analysis. CT identified 5 additional screws with ≥1 mm dorsal penetration not identified by the DTV. All except 1 screw was in the second dorsal wrist compartment. The DTV was 67% sensitive with a negative predictive value of 97%.It is risky and unnecessary to place bicortical screws in the distal part of a volar plate. Given that the DTV view was not sufficient to avoid dorsal screw prominence, distal screws should be intentionally 2-4 mm shorter than measured. Recent studies propose bicortical distal locking screws are not needed for sufficient construct stiffness in volar locked plating. We suggest caution when using this view to verify acceptable placement of screws in proximity to the second dorsal compartment.Diagnostic level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The use of intraoperative fluoroscopy has become a routine and useful adjunct within orthopaedic surgery. However, the fluoroscopy machine may become an additional source of contamination in the operating room, particularly when maneuvering from the anterior-posterior position to the lateral position. Consequently, draping techniques were developed to maintain sterility of the operative field and surgeon. Despite a variety of methods, no studies exist to compare the sterility of these techniques specifically when the fluoroscopy machine is in the lateral imaging position. We evaluated the sterility of 3 c-arm draping techniques in a simulated operative environment. The 3 techniques consisted of a traditional 3-quarter sterile sheet attached to the side of the operative table, a modified clip-drape method, and a commercially available sterile pouch. Our study demonstrated that the traditional method poses a high risk for sterile field contamination, whereas the modified clip-drape method and commercially available sterile pouch kept floor contamination furthest from the surgical field. With the current data, we urge surgeons to use modified techniques rather than the traditional draping method.

Remembering that preoperative planning, surgical indications, and fracture reduction are paramount for this procedure, presented here is our technique for performing percutaneous sacroiliac screws, both transiliac-transsacral and sacral style. A combination of video, still pictures, and fluoroscopy images will guide the viewer through the process we routinely use highlighting specific details. Patient positioning and intraoperative fluoroscopy imaging are critical to a successful procedure. Although inlet and outlet films remain important, we find the procedure best started on the lateral sacral view to reduce the need for start site, trajectory, and imaging position changes during the case. A cannulated pig sticker (drill guide) used with long drill tip guide wires provide improved manual control to both finding a good start site and directing the trajectory. For patient safety, sacral anatomy and safe zones are discussed as well. Using these technical points will help make this a successful procedure.

We present a case of inadvertent sacral bar transfixation of the cauda equina as a complication of posterior pelvic internal fixation. The "safe zone" for sacral bar placement is narrow, especially in the presence of fracture displacement. This complication can be avoided by achieving fracture reduction before internal fixation. Intraoperative fluoroscopy, including inlet and lateral sacral views, should be used in addition to tactile guidance to confirm the reduction. Even after prolonged compression, hardware removal under direct visualization can alleviate radicular symptoms with less effect on motor deficit.

To evaluate use of intraoperative fluoroscopy during acetabular surgery to determine fracture reduction and accurate placement of screws.Retrospective.Level I trauma center.Thirty patients with thirty-two acetabular fractures.Patients were evaluated with fluoroscopy during surgery to assess fracture reduction and screw placement. Anterior-posterior (AP), oblique, and lateral pelvic fluoroscopic images were obtained intraoperatively. Postoperative radiographs were used to verify fluoroscopic findings; computed tomography (CT) scans were used as the control to assess intraarticular screw placement.Radiographic and clinical assessment of fracture reduction and screw placement.Intraoperative fluoroscopy confirmed the extra-articular position of all screws evaluated. Postoperative CT scans confirmed the extra-articular placement of all screws assessed by fluoroscopy. Quality of reduction using intraoperative fluoroscopic images had a 100 percent correlation with reduction on final radiographs. One patient, with two screws placed without fluoroscopic evaluation, had intra-articular placement requiring revision surgery.Intraoperative fluoroscopy is effective in evaluating both acetabular fracture reduction and hardware placement.

Obesity can complicate surgical procedures by both adding to difficulty intraoperatively and increasing postoperative complications. Intraoperative imaging can be difficult on morbidly obese patients. We have noted specifically that in morbidly obese patients where the lateral sacrum cannot be visualized on the pre-operative scout computed tomography image, the lateral sacrum will not be able to be seen on intraoperative fluoroscopy. This is an important component of preoperative planning in morbidly obese patients with pelvic ring injuries.