Search

Background: With potential of deep learning in musculoskeletal image interpretation being explored, this paper focuses on the common site of rotator cuff tears, the supraspinatus. It aims to propose and validate a deep learning model to automatically extract the supraspinatus, verifying its superiority through comparison with several classical image segmentation models. Method: Imaging data were retrospectively collected from 60 patients who underwent inpatient treatment for rotator cuff tears at a hospital between March 2021 and May 2023. A dataset of the supraspinatus from MRI was constructed after collecting, filtering, and manually annotating at the pixel level. This paper proposes a novel A-DAsppUnet network that can automatically extract the supraspinatus after training and optimization. The analysis of model performance is based on three evaluation metrics: precision, intersection over union, and Dice coefficient. Results: The experimental results demonstrate that the precision, intersection over union, and Dice coefficients of the proposed model are 99.20%, 83.38%, and 90.94%, respectively. Furthermore, the proposed model exhibited significant advantages over the compared models. Conclusion: The designed model in this paper accurately extracts the supraspinatus from MRI, and the extraction results are complete and continuous with clear boundaries. The feasibility of using deep learning methods for musculoskeletal extraction and assisting in clinical decision-making was verified. This research holds practical significance and application value in the field of utilizing artificial intelligence for assisting medical decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In recent years, deep learning (DL) technology has been increasingly used for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration. This study aims to evaluate the performance of DL technology for IVD segmentation in magnetic resonance (MR) images and explore improvement strategies. Methods: We developed a PRISMA systematic review protocol and systematically reviewed studies that used DL algorithm frameworks to perform IVD segmentation based on MR images published up to April 10, 2024. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was used to assess methodological quality, and the pooled dice similarity coefficient (DSC) score and Intersection over Union (IoU) were calculated to evaluate segmentation performance. Results: 45 studies were included in this systematic review, of which 16 provided complete segmentation performance data and were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. The results indicated that DL models showed satisfactory IVD segmentation performance, with a pooled DSC of 0.900 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.887–0.914) and IoU of 0.863 (95% CI: 0.730–0.995). However, the subgroup analysis did not show significant effects of factors on IVD segmentation performance, including network dimensionality, algorithm type, publication year, number of patients, scanning direction, data augmentation, and cross-validation. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of DL technology in IVD segmentation and its further applications. However, due to the heterogeneity in algorithm frameworks and result reporting of the included studies, the conclusions should be interpreted with caution. Future research should focus on training generalized models on large-scale datasets to enhance their clinical application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: An efficient physics-informed deep learning approach for extracting spinopelvic measures from X-ray images is introduced and its performance is evaluated against manual annotations. Methods: Two datasets, comprising a total of 1470 images, were collected to evaluate the model's performance. We propose a novel method of detecting landmarks as objects, incorporating their relationships as constraints (LanDet). Using this approach, we trained our deep learning model to extract five spine and pelvis measures: Sacrum Slope (SS), Pelvic Tilt (PT), Pelvic Incidence (PI), Lumbar Lordosis (LL), and Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA). The results were compared to manually labelled test dataset (GT) as well as measures annotated separately by three surgeons. Results: The LanDet model was evaluated on the two datasets separately and on an extended dataset combining both. The final accuracy for each measure is reported in terms of Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Standard Deviation (SD), and R Pearson correlation coefficient as follows: [ S S ∘ : 3.7 (2.7) , R = 0.89 ] , [ P T ∘ : 1.3 (1.1) , R = 0.98 ] , [ P I ∘ : 4.2 (3.1) , R = 0.93 ] , [ L L ∘ : 5.1 (6.4) , R = 0.83 ] , [ S V A (m m) : 2.1 (1.9) , R = 0.96 ] . To assess model reliability and compare it against surgeons, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) metric is used. The model demonstrated better consistency with surgeons with all values over 0.88 compared to what was previously reported in the literature. Conclusion: The LanDet model exhibits competitive performance compared to existing literature. The effectiveness of the physics-informed constraint method, utilized in our landmark detection as object algorithm, is highlighted. Furthermore, we addressed the limitations of heatmap-based methods for anatomical landmark detection and tackled issues related to mis-identifying of similar or adjacent landmarks instead of intended landmark using this novel approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]