Search

Objective: To describe the mechanisms, situational patterns, and biomechanics (kinematics) of medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries in professional male soccer players., Design: Case series., Methods: Fifty-seven consecutive MCL injuries across 2 seasons of professional soccer matches were identified. We obtained and reviewed 37 of 57 (65%) injury videos to establish the injury mechanism, situational pattern, and knee flexion angle. We used detailed biomechanical analysis to assess the indirect and noncontact injuries. Injury layoff times, timing of injuries during the match, and location of the injuries on the pitch were also reported., Results: Twenty-three (62%) injuries were direct contact, 9 (24%) were indirect contact, and 5 (14%) were noncontact. Three main sprain mechanisms were noted: (1) direct contact/blow to the knee (n = 16), (2) contact to the leg or foot (lever like) (n = 7), and (3) sliding (n = 9). Seventy-three percent of MCL injuries occurred during 2 main situations: (1) pressing/tackling (n = 14, 38%) and (2) being tackled (n = 13, 35%). For indirect and noncontact injuries, knee valgus loading (100% of cases), hip abduction (73% of cases), and external foot rotation (92% of cases) were prominent injury kinematics, often with lateral trunk tilt (median, 10°; 64% of cases) and rotation (64% of cases). Knee flexion angles were higher for indirect and noncontact injuries (median, 100°) than for direct-contact injuries (median, 22°; P <.01)., Conclusion: Nearly two thirds of MCL injuries occurred after direct contact; 1 in every 4 MCL injuries occurred after indirect contact. Three sprain mechanisms characterized MCL injuries: (1) blow to the knee, (2) contact to the leg or foot (lever like), and (3) sliding. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021;51(12):611-618. Epub 16 Nov 2021. doi:10.2519/jospt.2021.10529 .

Synopsis: This paper is part 2 of a 2-part series aimed at discussing the key elements of on-field rehabilitation training. In part 1, we described 4 pillars underpinning high-quality on-field rehabilitation: (1) restoring movement quality, (2) physical conditioning, (3) restoring sport-specific skills, and (4) progressively developing chronic training load. In part 2, we describe how the pillars contribute to a 5-stage on-field rehabilitation program to help injured players transition to team practice and match play. We use the example of a soccer player with ambitions to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The program moves through 5 field-based training stages: (1) linear movement, (2) multidirectional movement, (3) soccer-specific technical skills, (4) soccer-specific movement, and (5) practice simulation. The staged program is research based and facilitates communication, planning, control, and safety in return to sport following long-term injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(8):570-575. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8952 .

Synopsis: Outcomes following long-term injuries such as anterior cruciate ligament rupture are unsatisfactory. To improve outcomes, we must improve rehabilitation practices. One aspect of the return-to-sport process that has received limited attention is on-field rehabilitation. This article is part 1 of a 2-part series aimed at discussing the important elements of on-field rehabilitation and illustrating how they can be applied across a 5-stage on-field rehabilitation program following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The intention of on-field rehabilitation is to support athletes in their transition back to sport after injury, from standard rehabilitation to return to the team or practice. In part 1, we describe 4 pillars of high-quality on-field rehabilitation: (1) restoring movement quality, (2) physical conditioning, (3) restoring sport-specific skills, and (4) progressively developing chronic training load. In part 2, we describe how these pillars may be combined into a 5-stage on-field rehabilitation program to help athletes transition to team practice and match play following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(8):565-569. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8954 .