Search

Heterogenization of catalytically important homogeneous catalysts on solid supports has become an expanding area of research. PNN and PONOP ruthenium pincer complexes were immobilized on a silica poly(allylamine) composite, BP-1 by a two-step Mannich reaction. The complexes on BP-1 were characterized by solid state NMR, FT-IR, elemental analysis, and metal digestion studies. Model solution experiments were carried out to determine the site of electrophilic substitution on the pyridine ring of the pincer complexes and revealed substitution in both the meta - and para -position. The catalytic reactivity of immobilized (PNN)RuH(Cl)(CO) and (PONOP)RuH(Cl)(CO) on BP-1 was studied for the dehydrogenative coupling of alcohols to esters with the liberation of H 2 . Moderate to good ester yields were realized with both immobilized systems without using the base required for the homogeneous reaction and also in the presence of KOH. The homogeneous model reactions required a base for ester formation. The amine functionality on BP-1 served as the base to generate the active pincer catalyst on the BP-1 surface. Both immobilized catalysts were recycled for multiple alcohol reaction cycles. Four-step control experiments were carried out using an alcohol and both immobilized systems. The results revealed the heterogeneity of the alcohol catalysis by both BP-1-Ru-PNN and BP-1-Ru-PONOP systems. This study has opened a new catalytic methodology for reactions where base is required for catalyst activation, by using a solid support with basic functionality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immobilization of catalytically active transition metal complexes on silica polyamine composite (SPC) surfaces offers many advantages for applications in catalysis particularly for catalyst recovery and reuse. We report here the immobilization of PONOP pincer complexes of Ru, Rh, Ni and Pd on the poly(allylamine) SPC, BP-1 using the Mannich reaction. Three different methods have been investigated for synthesizing the PONOP pincer transition metal complexes on BP-1: 1) direct reaction of the preformed pincer complexes using a two step Mannich reaction; 2) immobilization of the PONOP ligand using the Mannich reaction followed by the addition of a transition metal compound of a given metal; 3) the stepwise construction of PONOP on BP-1 followed by addition of a transition metal compound. The immobilized complexes on BP-1 were characterized by FT-IR, solid-state CPMAS 13 C and 31 P NMR, as well as elemental analysis. Anchoring of the complexes on BP-1 was also evaluated by the metal loading data obtained from the digestion of the loaded composites followed by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) or Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICPAES). The results showed that method 1 works better for the loading of pincer complexes on the SPC than methods 2 and 3. In the case of the Ru and Ni pincer complexes reasonable agreement with the phosphorous analysis was realized, while for the Pd complex values were high relative to the loading predicted from the phosphorus analysis, indicating the formation of the Pd nanoparticles on the surface during immobilization. For the Rh and Ru immobilized complexes with methods 2 & 3, metal loading was lower than the phosphorous analysis and this is attributed to entrained triphenylphosphine from the starting rhodium and ruthenium complexes based on the 13 C and 31 P CPMAS NMR data. Solution experiments using the PONOP pincer ligand and the Ru(PONOP) complex with n-butyl amine were conducted to model the site of electrophilic aromatic substitution on the pyridine ring. It was found that substitution both meta - and para -to the nitrogen takes place and this helped in the interpretation of the solid-state data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In an attempt to understand the factors that govern the rates of reaction of the complexes [Pt(en)Cl(NH2R)]+NO3− (en = ethylene diamine) with guanosine monophosphate (dGMP) a series of amine complexes, where R＝C8H9NO2 (benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-ylmethanamine) (1), C8H11N (phenethylamine) (2), C7H9N (benzylamine) (3), C6H7N (aniline) (4), C6H6IN (p-iodo-aniline) (5) C3H9NO (2-methoxy-ethylamine) (6) and C6H13N (cyclohexylamine) (7), were synthesized and their reactions with deoxyguanosine monophosphate (dGMP) were followed by 1H NMR. Compound 1 was initially chosen because it showed significant water solubility. Compound 1 reacted quantitatively but slowly with dGMP and a subsequent Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) study of the binding 1 to a GATC DNA repeat gave a TEM micrograph that showed selective labeling of DNA at guanine, using a technique that allowed the laying down of a straight single strand of DNA on a carbon platform. The TEM suggested a possible side reaction with adenine and so a study of the reaction of 1 with adenine was performed and showed slow and what appeared to be non-specific binding to deoxyadenosine monophosphate (dAMP). The reactions of compounds 2–7 with dGMP were then studied by 1H NMR and it was found that 2 reacted much faster than 1 with dGMP while the remaining complexes reacted more slowly. No reaction of 2 with dAMP was observed in the same time frame. The ultimate goal of the project was to bind a third row transition metal cluster to guanine and given the effective binding of 1 to DNA the synthesis of the complex [Os3(CO)11PPh2(CH2)2NH2(en)PtCl]NO3 (9) is also reported that contains Pt as a linker to label guanine. The synthesis was performed by reacting Os3(CO)10(CH3CN)2 with Ph2PCH2CH2NH2 which gave an η2 chelate complex Os3(CO)10PPh2(CH2)2NH2 (8). Complex 8 was reacted with [Pt(en)Cl(DMF)]NO3 in a CO atmosphere to give 9. 1H and 195Pt NMR indicate formation of an adduct with dGMP but too slowly to be of use in labeling DNA. The solid-state structure of 8 is also reported. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The water-soluble triosmium cluster [Os3(CO)9(μ-η2-(4-CHO)C9H5N)(μ-H)(P(OCH2CH2N(CH3)3I)3)] (4) was tested for its reactivity with plasmid DNA. In contrast to the band retardation previously observed with a related series of positively charged clusters, an intensification and retardation of three discrete bands was observed with increasing cluster concentration. In order to further investigate the apparent modification of DNA by 4, its interaction with a 22-oligomer (sequence 5′-AGT TGT GGT GAC TTT CCC AGG C-3′) was examined. Incubation with this oligonucleotide (pH 7.4 in Tris–HCl buffer and 100 mM NaCl) followed by HPLC analysis revealed the formation of three dose dependent products assigned as covalent modifications at three sites of the oligonucleotide. Incubation of 4 with 32P-ATP labeled oligonucleotide at the 5′-end followed by treatment with piperidine and comparison with the standard Maxam–Gilbert sequencing protocol products revealed only general background cleavage, indicating that the modification products are piperidine labile and suggesting that the modification involved formation of a Schiff base. An alternative approach was then pursued which involved annealing the 4-oligonucleotide products with their complementary strand and treatment of the resulting duplex DNAwith the exonuclease, Exo III. This assay indicated three exonuclease stops, consistent with the three products observed by HPLC whose electrophoretic mobility approximately matched guanine containing fragments when compared with the Maxam–Gilbert sequencing lanes. Reduction of the 4-oligonucleotide products with borohydride reducing agents, followed by treatment with piperidine, resulted in the formation of one product (by HPLC) with the same electrophoretic mobility as the AGTT fragment based on comparison with the Maxam–Gilbert sequencing lanes. This product most likely results from reduction of an initially formed Schiff base adduct (to the corresponding amine) with the guanine of the TGT fragment of the oligonucleotide, and corresponds to the most stable of the three Schiff base adducts detected by HPLC and by incubation with the exonuclease. The other two products are less stable and competitive reduction of the free aldehyde functionality on the cluster in equilibrium with these adducts precludes their detection after treatment with the reducing agents. The formation of the Schiff base adduct is further corroborated by the model reaction of [Os3(CO)10(μ-η2-(4-CHO)C9H5N)(μ-H)] (4′) with acetylated guanine in nonaqueous solvents where disappearance of the aldehyde resonance and the appearance of several new resonances in the 6–9 ppm region of the 1H NMR of the reaction mixture is noted. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The synthesis, structure and photophysical properties of the complexes [Ru[(CO)(TFA) (PPh 3 ) 2 (L)][(L = ppy = 2-phenylpyridine, ( 1a ); L = 2–(p–tolyl)pyridine] ( 1b ), are reported. The complexes were characterized by UV-VIS, IR and NMR and by single-crystal X-ray diffraction techniques. We also report the synthesis, structure and photophysical properties of [Ru(CO)(L)(PPhMe 2 ) 2 (L′)] + [PF 6 ] − [L′ = bipyridine, L = TFA, ( 3a ); L = H, ( 3b ) and L = H, L′ = 4,4′-dimethlyl bipyridine ( 3c )]. These compounds were characterized by UV-VIS, IR and NMR techniques and by a single crystal X-ray diffraction in the case of 3a. The solid state structure of [Ru(Me 2 PhP) 2 (CO) 2 (TFA) 2 (2) which is the starting material for the synthesis 3a - 3c is also reported to verify the trans relationship of the less bulky PPhMe 2 and for comparison with the previously reported PPh 3 analogs. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact, if any, of replacing bpy with ppy in the case of 1a and alkylation of the benzene ring in the case of 1b on the photophysical and electrochemical properties compared to related Ru(bpy) complexes. In contrast to the bpy analogs 1a and 1b showed reversible 1e − oxidations and blue-shifted MLCT absorptions. In the case of 3a - 3c we were interested in the effect on the photophysical properties of substituting PPh 3 with the less bulky but more electron donating PPhMe 2 . There were only minor changes in the photophysical and electrochemical properties relative to the previously reported PPh 3 analogs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The reaction of the benzothiazolate-capped triosmium clusters Os 3 (CO) 9 (μ 3 ,η 2 -C 7 H 3 NSR)(μ-H) ( 1a , R = H; 1b , R = Me) with PPh 3 proceeds readily at room temperature with a μ 3 ,η 2 → μ,η 2 hapticity change in the benzothiazolate heterocycle to furnish Os 3 (CO) 9 (PPh 3 )(μ,η 2 -C 7 H 3 NSR)(μ-H) ( 2a , R = H; 2b , R = Me) in high yields. X-ray crystallography has confirmed the regiospecific nature of this reaction where the PPh 3 ligand is bound to the osmium atom that serves as the coordination site for the hydride and the metalated-carbon atom associated with the edge-bridged benzothiazolate ligand. The thermolysis of 2a and 2b in boiling toluene affords several new Os 3 clusters as a result of ligand isomerization, decarbonylation, and ortho metalation of the ancillary PPh 3 ligand. The new products have been isolated and characterized by a combination of spectroscopic methods and X-ray crystallography in the case of 3b , 4b , 5b and 6b . Clusters 3b and 4b are isomers of 2b and differ in the location of the hydride and PPh 3 ligands relative to the benzothiazolate moiety. Electronic structure calculations on the isomeric clusters 2b , 3b , and 4b confirm that 2b is the kinetic product of ligand substitution, accounting for its rearrangement to the latter two isomers upon heating. Cluster 5b contains a face-capping benzothiazolate moiety and is shown by DFT calculations to derive from a site-selective loss of an axial CO group in 4b . Cluster 6a,b formed from 5a,b as a result of further decarbonylation with concomitant ortho metalation of one of the phenyl groups of the coordinated PPh 3 ligand. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reactions of Ru3(CO)10(µ-dppf) (1) (dppf = 1,1'-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene), Ru3(CO)10(µ-dppm) (2) (dppm = bis(diphenylphosphino)methane), and the orthometalated derivative Ru3(CO)9{µ3- PPhCH2PPh(C6H4)} (3) with silanes (Ph3SiH, Et3SiH, Ph2SiH2) are reported. Treatment of 1 with Ph3SiH and Ph2SiH2 at room temperature leads to facile Si--H bond activation to afford Ru3(CO)9(µ-dppf)(SiPh3)(µ-H) (4) (60% yield) and Ru3(CO)9(µ-dppf)(SiPh2H)(µ-H) (6) (53% yield), respectively. The reaction of 1 with Ph3SiH has been investigated by electronic structure calculations, and these data have facilitated the analysis of the potential energy surface leading to 4. Compound 1 does not react with Et3SiH at room temperature but reacts at 68 °C to give Ru3(CO)9(µ-dppf)(SiEt3)(µ-H) (5) in 45% yield. Reaction of 2 with Ph3SiH at room temperature yields two new products: Ru3(CO)9(µ-dppm)(SiPh3)(µ-H) (7) in 40% yield and Ru3(CO)6(µ3-O)(µ-dppm)(SiPh3)(µ- H)3 (8) in 15% yield. Interestingly, at room temperature compound 7 slowly reverts back to 2 in solution with decomposition and liberation of Ph3SiH. Complex 8 can also be prepared from the direct reaction between 7 and H2O. Similar reactions of 2 with Et3SiH and Ph2SiH2 give only intractable materials. The orthometalated compound 3 does not react with Ph3SiH, Et3SiH and Ph2SiH2 at room temperature but does react at 66 °C to give Ru3(µ-CO)(CO)7{µ3- PPhCH2PPh(C6H4)}(SiR2R¹)(µ- H)](9, R = R' = Ph, 71% yield; 10, R = R' = Et, 60% yield; 11, R = Ph, R' = H, 66% yield) by activation of the Si--H bond. Compounds 4 and 8--11 have been structurally characterized. In 4, both the dppf and the hydride bridge a common Ru--Ru vector, whereas NMR studies on 7 indicate that two ligands span different Ru--Ru edges. Compound 8 contains a face-capping oxo moiety, a terminally coordinated SiPh3 ligand, and three bridging hydride ligands, whereas 9--11 represent simple oxidative addition products. In all of the compounds examined, the triruthenium framework retains its integrity and the silyl groups occupy equatorial sites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Upon mild heating (60–65°C), electron-deficient [Os3(CO)9(μ3-C7H4NS)(μ-H)] (1) readily adds to the activated alkyne, RChsp sp="0.25" />=CO2Me), to give two isomers of the alkenyl complexes, [Os3(CO)9(μ-C7H4NS)(μ3-RCCHR)] (2 and 3), differing in the orientation of the benzothiazole ligand. In both the alkenyl ligand acts as a five-electron donor binding through both carbons and one of the oxygen atoms of the substituents, which adopt a relative cis disposition. Heating 2 cleanly affords 3 suggesting that the former is the kinetic product and the latter is thermodynamically favoured. At higher temperatures (110°C), 3 rearranges to a third isomer [Os3(CO)9(μ-C7H4NS)(μ-RCCHR)] (4) which differs in the binding mode of the alkenyl ligand and where the alkyne substituents are in a relative trans disposition. A second product of this reaction is [Os3(CO)8(μ-OCH3){μ3-C7H4NSC(R)C}(μ-H)] (5) which results from the loss of two moles of CO, carbon–carbon coupling between hydrocarbyl and benzothiazole ligands and carbon–hydrogen addition to the triosmium centre. All new clusters are characterized by a total of 50 valence electrons and contain two metal–metal bonds as shown by single crystal X-ray diffraction studies. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The series of complexes [XRu(CO)(L–L)(L′)2][PF6] (X = H, TFA, Cl; L–L = 2,2′-bipyridyl, 1,10-phenanthroline, 5-amino-1,10-phenanthroline and 4,4′-dicarboxylic-2,2′-bipyridyl; L′2 = 2PPh3, Ph2PC2H4PPh2, Ph2PCH＝CHPPh2) have been synthesized from the starting complex K[Ru(CO)3(TFA)3] (TFA = CF3CO2) by first reacting with the phosphine ligand, followed by reaction with the L–L and anion exchange with NaPF6. In the case of L–L = phenanthroline and L′2 = 2PPh3, the neutral complex Ru(Ph3P)(CO)(1,10-phenanthroline)(TFA)2 is also obtained and its solid state structure is reported. Solid state structures are also reported for the cationic complexes where L–L = phenanthroline, L2 = 2PPh3 and X = Cl and for L–L = 2,2′-bipyridyl, L2 = 2PPh3 and X = H. All the complexes were characterized in solution by a combination of 1H and 31P NMR, IR, mass spectrometry and elemental analyses. The purpose of the project was to synthesize a series of complexes that exhibit a range of excited-state lifetimes and that have large Stokes shifts, high quantum yields and high intrinsic polarizations associated with their metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (MLCT) emissions. To a large degree these goals have been realized in that excited-state lifetimes in the range of 100 ns to over 1 μs are observed. The lifetimes are sensitive to both solvent and the presence of oxygen. The measured quantum yields and intrinsic anisotropies are higher than for previously reported Ru(II) complexes. Interestingly, the neutral complex with one phosphine ligand shows no MLCT emission. Under the conditions of synthesis some of the initially formed complexes with X = TFA are converted to the corresponding hydrides or in the presence of chlorinated solvents to the corresponding chlorides, testifying to the lability of the TFA Ligand. The compounds show multiple reduction potentials which are chemically and electrochemically reversible in a few cases as examined by cyclic voltammetry. The relationships between the observed photophysical properties of the complexes and the nature of the ligands on the Ru(II) is discussed. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Treatment of unsaturated [Os3(CO)8{μ3-Ph2PCH2P(Ph)C6H4}(μ-H)] (2) with t BuNC at room temperature gives [Os3(CO)8(CNBu t )){μ3-Ph2PCH2P(Ph)C6H4}(μ-H)] (3) which on thermolysis in refluxing toluene furnishes [Os3(CO)7(CNBu t ){μ3-Ph2PCHP(Ph)C6H4}(μ-H)2] (4). Reaction of the labile complex [Os3(CO)9(μ-dppm)(NCMe)] (5) with t BuNC at room temperature affords the substitution product [Os3(CO)9(μ-dppm)(CNBu t )] (6). Thermolysis of 6 in refluxing toluene gives 4. On the other hand, the reaction of unsaturated [Os3(CO)9{μ3-η2-C7H3(2-Me)NS}(μ-H)] (7) with t BuNC yields the addition product [Os3(CO)9(CNBu t ){μ-η2-C7H3(2-Me)NS}(μ-H)] (8) which on decarbonylation in refluxing toluene gives unsaturated [Os3(CO)8(CNBu t ){μ3-η2-C7H3(2-Me)NS}(μ-H)] (9). Compound 9 reacts with PPh3 at room temperature to give the adduct [Os3(CO)8(PPh3)(CNBu t ){μ-η2-C7H3(2-Me)NS(μ-H)] (10). Compound 8 exists as two isomers in solution whereas 10 occurs in four isomeric forms. The molecular structures of 3, 6, 8, and 10 have been determined by X-ray diffraction studies. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: We report a combined experimental and computational study of new rhenium tricarbonyl complexes based on the bidentate heterocyclic N–N ligands 2-(4-methylpyridin-2-yl)benzo[d]-X-azole (X=N–CH3, O, or S) and 2-(benzo[d]-X-azol-2-yl)-4-methylquinoline (X=N–CH3, O, or S). Two sets of complexes are reported. Chloro complexes, described by the general formula Re(CO)3[2-(4-methylpyridin-2-yl)benzo[d]-X-azole]Cl (X=N–CH3, 1; X=O, 2; X=S, 3) and Re(CO)3[2-(benzo[d]-X-azol-2-yl)-4-methylquinoline]Cl (X=N–CH3, 4; X=O, 5; X=S, 6) were synthesized heating at reflux Re(CO)5Cl with the appropriate N–N ligand in toluene. The corresponding pyridine set {Re(CO)3[2-(4-methylpyridin-2-yl)benzo-X-azole]py}PF6 (X=N–CH3, 7; X=O, 8; X=S, 9) and {Re(CO)3[2-(benzo[d]-X-azol-2-yl)-4-methylquinoline]py}PF6 (X=N–CH3, 10; X=O, 11; X=S, 12) was synthesized by halide abstraction with silver nitrate of 1–6 followed by heating in pyridine and isolated as their hexafluorophosphate salts. All complexes have been fully characterized by IR, NMR, electrochemical techniques and luminescence. The crystal structures of 1 and 7 were obtained by X-ray diffraction. DFT and time-dependent (TD) DFT calculations were carried out for investigating the effect of the organic ligand on the optical properties and electronic structure of the reported complexes. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Heating [Os3(CO)10(μ-dppm)] (1) with two equivalents of PhSSPh in toluene under reflux provided three new triosmium compounds [(μ-H)Os3(CO)7(μ-SPh){μ3-η4-Ph2PCHP(Ph)C6H4}] (2), [Os3(CO)8(μ-SPh)2(μ-dppm)] (3) and [(μ-H)Os3(CO)7(μ-η2-SC6H4)(μ-SPh)(μ-dppm)] (4) in 20%, 21% and 26% yields, respectively. In contrast, a similar reaction of 1 with two equivalents of PhTeTePh in refluxing toluene gave the binuclear compound [Os2(CO)4(μ-TePh)2(μ-dppm)] (6) in 15% yield, and two 50 electron isomeric compounds 5 and 7 with the formula [Os3(CO)8(μ-TePh)2(μ-dppm)] in 20% and 23% yields, respectively. Thermolysis of 3 at 110°C afforded 4 in 53% yield which on further thermolysis in refluxing octane at 128°C gave 2 in 45% yield. Thermolysis of 3 in refluxing octane also gave 2 in 50% yield. The new compounds, 2–7, were all spectroscopically characterized, and the X-ray structures of 2, 3 and 7 have been determined. Compound 2 contains a bridging SPh ligand and a μ3,η4-Ph2PCHP(Ph)C6H4 ligand, formed by two kinds of C–H activation, including orthometallation of a phenyl group as well as an unusual activation of the methylene group of the dppm ligand. The molecular structure of 3 reveals that two SPh groups span the open Os–Os edge of the Os3 triangle, while the dppm ligand bridges one of the closed Os–Os edges. In compound 7, one TePh group spans the open Os–Os edge, while the other spans one of the two closed Os–Os edges and the dppm ligand bridges the third Os–Os vector. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Treatment of the electronically unsaturated cluster [(μ-H)Os3(CO)8(Ph2PCH2P(Ph)C6H4)] (1) with HCl gas at ambient temperature in dichloromethane afforded (μ-H)Os3(CO)8(μ-Cl)(μ-dppm) (2) and [(μ-H)Os3(CO)7(η1-Cl)(μ-Cl)2(μ-dppm)] (3). Thermolysis of 2 at 110 °C led to an isomer of 2, 4. A similar reaction of 1 with HBr gas gave [(μ-H)Os3(CO)8(μ-Br)(μ-dppm)] (5) as the only product which does not isomerize at 110 °C. In sharp contrast, treatment of 1 with HF gas gave the protonated species [(μ-H)2Os3(CO)8(Ph2PCH2P(Ph)C6H4)]+ (6). Treatment of 1 with CF3CO2H also gave cation 6 whereas CH3CO2H yielded [(μ-H)Os3(CO)8(μ-η2-CH3CO2)(μ-dppm)] (7). Structures of 2, 3, 4 and 6 were established crystallographically. In 2, both the chloride and the hydride ligands simultaneously bridge the same Os–Os edge and the dppm spans another Os–Os bond whereas in 4, all the three ligands bridge the same Os–Os edge. Compound 3 is comprised of an open Os3 arrangement in which one chloride bridges the open Os⋯Os edge, another chloride and a hydride mutually bridge an Os–Os bond and the third chloride is terminally coordinated to one of the Os atoms of the dppm bridged edge. The cation 6 consists of a triangle of osmium atoms in which the shortest Os–Os edge is bridged by a hydride and the metallated phenyl ring and the longest edge is bridged by another hydride and the diphosphine ligand. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The reaction of [Ru3(CO)10(mu-dppm)] (1) with dppmSe at 66 °C affords [Ru3(CO)8(mu-dppm)2] (2), [Ru3(CO)7(mu3-CO)(mu3-Se)(mu-dppm)] (3), [Ru3(CO)5(mu3-CO)(mu3-Se)(mu-dppm)2] (4) and [Ru3(CO)6(mu3-CO)(mu3-Se)(mu-dppm)(mu1-Ph2PCH2P(double bond; length as m-dashO)Ph2)] (5) in 7%, 5%, 9% and 33% yields, respectively. A similar reaction between 1 with dppmS gives [Ru3(CO)7(mu3-S)2(mu-dppm)] (6), [Ru3(CO)7(mu3-CO)(mu3-S)(mu-dppm)] (7) [Ru3(CO)5(mu3-CO)(mu3-S)(mu-dppm)2] (8) and [Ru3(CO)6(mu3-CO)(mu3-S)(mu-dppm)(mu1-Ph2PCH2P(double bond; length as m-dashO)Ph2)] (9) in 8%, 7%, 14% and 35% yields, respectively. Treatment of 1 with PhSeSePh at 66 °C affords the dinuclear compound [Ru2(CO)4(mu-SePh)2(mu-dppm)] (10) in 14% yield. Thermolysis of 5 and 9in refluxing toluene at 110 °C gives 4 and 8, respectively. The molecular structures of 4, 9 and 10 have been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies. The cores of the new clusters 4, 5, 8 and 9 consist of metal triangles capped by mu3-sulfur or selenium atoms with the bidentate ligand bridging in equatorial positions. In compounds 4 and 8, two bidentate dppm ligands bridge the Ru3 triangle in such a way that each ligand bridges two ruthenium atoms and one Ru-Ru edge remains unbridged. Compounds 5 and 9 contain one bridging dppm ligand and one dangling dppm mono-oxide ligand Ph2PCH2P(double bond; length as m-dashO)Ph2 coordinated to the rear metal atom at an equatorial position. The molecular structure of 10 shows classical "sawhorse" structure with two bridging SePh ligands as well as the dppm ligand. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The synthesis and solution chemistry of the water soluble clusters [Os3(CO)9(μ-η2-Bz)(μ-H)L+] (HBz=quinoxaline, L+=[P(OCH2CH2NMe3)3I3], 1) along with its negatively charged analog [Os3(CO)9(μ-η2-Bz)(μ-H)L-] (L-=[P(C6H4SO3)3Na3], 2) are reported. In addition, we have examined the reduction potentials of the complexes [Os3(CO)9(μ-η2-Bz)(μ-H)L] (HBz=phenanthridine, L=L+ (3); HBz=5,6 benzoquinoline, L=L+ (4); HBz=3-amino quinoline, L=L+ (5); HBz=3-amino quinoline, L=L- (6). The neutral analog of 1 and 2 [Os3(CO)9(μ-η2-Bz)(μ-H) PPh3] (Bz=quinoxaline, 7) was also examined for comparison. Both compounds 1 and 2 show pH dependent NMR spectra that are interpreted in terms of the extent of protonation of the uncoordinated quinoxaline nitrogen which impacts the degree of aggregation of the clusters in aqueous solution. Compound 1 undergoes a reversible 1e- reduction in water while 2 undergoes a quasi-reversible 1e- reduction at more negative potentials as expected from the difference in charge on the phosphine ligand. Compound 7 undergoes a marginally reversible CV in methylene chloride at a potential intermediate between the positively and negatively charged clusters. The overall stability of the radical anions of 1, 2 and 7 is somewhat less than the corresponding decacarbonyl [Os3(CO)10(μ-η2-Bz)(μ-H)] (HBz=quinoxaline). While complexes 1 and 2 show reversible 1e- reductions, all the other complexes examined show 1e- and/or two 1e- irreversible reductions in aqueous and non-aqueous solvents. The potentials for these complexes follow expected trends relating to the charge on the phosphine and the pH of the aqueous solutions. The ligand dependent trends are compared with those of the previously reported corresponding decacarbonyls. The interactions of the positively and negatively charged clusters with albumin have been investigated using the transverse and longitudinal relaxation times of the hydride resonances as probes of binding to the protein. Evidence of binding is observed for both the positive and negative clusters but the positive and negative clusters exhibit distinctly different rotational correlation times. Two additional complexes [Os3(CO)9(μ-η2-Bz)(μ-H)L] (HBz=2-methylbenzimidazole, L=L+ (8); L=L- (10) and HBz=quinoline-4-carboxaldehyde, L=L+ (9); L=L- (11)) are reported in connection with these studies. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The reaction of [Os3(CO)10(μ-dppm)] (4) with diphenyldiselenide in refluxing toluene at 110 °C affords the dinuclear compound [Os2(CO)4(μ-SePh)2(μ-dppm)] (5), three 50 electron isomeric triosmium compounds 6, 7 and 8 with the formula [Os3(CO)8(μ-SePh)2(μ-dppm)], two triosmium benzyne compounds [Os3(CO)6(μ-CO)(μ-η2-Se)2(μ-C6H4)(μ-dppm)] (9) and [Os3(CO)9(μ-SePh)2(μ-η2-C6H4)(μ-dppm)] (10) in 11%, 19%, 15%, 5%, 18% and 6% yields, respectively. Thermolysis of both 6 and 8 in refluxing toluene gives the dinuclear compound 5 in moderate yield, whereas a similar thermolysis of 7 yields 5 and 9 in 20% and 27% yields, respectively. Compound 10 converts to 9 refluxing in octane. Treatment of the unsaturated compound [(μ-H)Os3(CO)8{Ph2PCH2P(Ph)C6H4}] (11) with diphenyldiselenide in refluxing benzene gives 5, 6, 7 and 8 in 8%, 20%, 25% and 10% yields, respectively. The molecular structures of 5, 6, 7 and 9 have been determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction studies. The molecular structure of 5 shows classical “sawhorse” structure with two bridging phenylselenido ligands as well as a dppm ligand. The solid-state structure of 6 reveals that two SePh groups span the open Os–Os edges of the Os3 triangle, while the dppm ligand bridges one of the closed Os–Os edges. In compound 7, one SePh spans the open Os–Os site, while the other spans one of the two closed Os–Os edges and the dppm ligand bridges the third Os–Os vector. Compound 9, which exists as a mixture of two isomers in solution, contains two triply bridging selenido ligands and a benzyne ligand, which are believed to have been formed by the cleavage of Se–Se bond of the PhSeSePh ligand followed by C–Se and C–H activation of the SePh group. The 54 electron compound 10 has been characterized by elemental analysis, IR, 1H NMR, 31P{1H} NMR and mass spectroscopic data. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]