Search

Background: Sorghum is the fifth most consumed cereal grain but limiting in the indispensable amino acid lysine. Complementing sorghum with lentils can improve the quality of sorghum-based diets. However, knowledge of lysine bioavailability in sorghum is lacking.Objectives: The study objectives were to determine the bioavailability of lysine in sorghum and to assess the effect of complementation of sorghum and lentils in a mixed-meal format.Methods: We studied 5 healthy young men (≤30 years; BMI <25 kg/m2) in a repeated-measure design using the indicator amino acid oxidation (IAAO) method, with L-[1-13C] phenylalanine as the indicator. Each subject participated in 8 determinations in random order. On the reference diet, subjects received 4 amounts of L-lysine (5, 8, 12, and 15 mg. kg-1 . d-1) from a crystalline amino acid mixture patterned after egg protein. On the test diet, they received 3 levels of lysine (8.2, 12.5, and 15.7 mg. kg-1 . d-1) from sorghum, and on the complementation diet they received 1 level of lysine from a mixed meal of sorghum and lentils. The bioavailability of lysine in sorghum was estimated by comparing the IAAO response to the test diet with the IAAO response to the reference diet using the slope-ratio method. Effectiveness of complementation was assessed by comparing the IAAO response to the mixed meal to the IAAO response to the test protein.Results: The bioavailability of lysine from sorghum was 94%. Upon complementation with lentils, there was a decline in the oxidation of L-[1-13C] phenylalanine by 19% (P < 0.0495), reflecting an improvement in available lysine in the mixed meal due to increased lysine intake.Conclusions: Although the bioavailability of lysine in sorghum is high, its lysine content is limiting. Complementation with lentils in a 1:1 ratio is recommended to achieve the lysine requirement for adult men consuming a sorghum-based diet. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03411005. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Accurate measurement of dietary intake is vital for providing nutrition interventions and understanding the complex role of diet in health. Traditional dietary assessment methods are very resource intensive and burdensome to participants. Technology may help mitigate these limitations and improve dietary data capture.Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of a novel mobile application (PIQNIQ) in capturing dietary intake by self-report. Our secondary objective was to assess whether food capture using PIQNIQ was comparable with an interviewer-assisted 24-h recall (24HR).Methods: This study was a single-center randomized clinical trial enrolling 132 adults aged 18 to 65 y from the general population. Under a provided-food protocol with 3 menus designed to include a variety of foods, participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 food capture methods: simultaneous entry using PIQNIQ, photo-assisted recall using PIQNIQ, and 24HR. Primary outcomes were energy and nutrient content (calories, total fat, carbohydrates, protein, added sugars, calcium, dietary fiber, folate, iron, magnesium, potassium, saturated fat, sodium, and vitamins A, C, D, and E) captured by the 3 methods.Results: The majority of nutrients reported were within 30% of consumed intake in all 3 food capture methods (n = 129 completers). Reported intake was highly (>30%) overestimated for added sugars in both PIQNIQ groups and underestimated for calcium in the photo-assisted recall group only (P < 0.001 for all). However, in general, both PIQNIQ methods had similar levels of accuracy and were comparable to the 24HR except in their overestimation (>30%) of added sugars and total fat (P < 0.001 for both).Conclusions: Our results suggest that intuitive, technology-based methods of dietary data capture are well suited to modern users and, with proper execution, can provide data that are comparable to data obtained with traditional methods. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03578458. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Height is an indicator of nutritional status; linear growth faltering has recognized consequences for cognitive, emotional, and chronic disease risk. Although height is routinely studied in developing countries, less attention is given to height in the United States.Objective: The objective of this study was to identify longitudinal associations between childhood and adolescent beverage intakes, nutrient adequacy, or energy intake and height in a birth cohort.Methods: Data for participants through ages 2-17 y (n = 717; 353 males, 364 females) recruited at birth for the longitudinal Iowa Fluoride Study (IFS) were used in the current cohort analyses. Beverage intakes (n = 708) were collected by beverage-frequency questionnaires at 3- to 6-mo intervals, whereas nutrient data (n = 652) were obtained from 3-d food diaries completed at 3- to 6-mo intervals through age 8.5 y and from Block Kids' food-frequency questionnaires at 2-y intervals after age 8.5 y. Nutrient adequacy ratios were calculated with the use of age- and sex-specific Estimated Average Requirements. Height was measured at clinic visits when the participants were approximately ages 5, 9, 11, 13, 15, and 17 y. Linear mixed models were used to identify longitudinal associations between dietary variables and height. A baseline model that adjusted for changing growth patterns during adolescence was established. Dietary and potential confounding variables were added to this baseline model.Results: Milk intake adjusted for mean adequacy ratio, energy intake, and baseline socioeconomic status was associated with height; for each additional 8 ounces (236 mL) of milk consumed per day throughout childhood and adolescence, height increased, on average, by 0.39 cm (95% CI: 0.18, 0.60 cm; P < 0.001).Conclusions: IFS participants' height increased by 0.39 cm for each additional 8 ounces (236 mL) of milk consumed throughout childhood and adolescence. The clinical implications of the mild linear growth faltering observed in healthy youth are unknown. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as 199112665. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Population-based studies report differences in folate status indicators among Mexican American (MA), African American (AA) and Caucasian (CA) women. It is unclear, however, whether these differences are due to variations in dietary folate intake. The present study was designed to investigate the influence of ethnicity/race on folate status parameters in MA, AA, and CA women (18-45 y; n = 14 in each group) under conditions of strictly controlled folate intake. In addition, the adequacy of the 1998 folate U.S. recommended dietary allowance (RDA), 400 micro g/d as dietary folate equivalents (DFE), for non-Caucasian women was assessed. Subjects (n = 42) with the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677 CC genotype consumed a low-folate diet (135 micro g DFE/d) for 7 wk followed by repletion with 400 (7 MA, 7 AA, 7 CA) or 800 micro g DFE/d (7 MA, 7 AA, 7 CA) for 7 wk. AA women had lower (P

The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of the dietary fat composition on LDL peak particle diameter. Therefore, we measured LDL size by gradient gel electrophoresis in 56 (30 men, 26 women) healthy participants in a controlled dietary study. First, all participants received a baseline diet rich in saturated fat for 2 wk; they were then randomly assigned to one of three dietary treatments, which contained refined olive oil [rich in monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), n = 18], rapeseed oil [rich in MUFA and (n-3)-polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), n = 18], or sunflower oil [rich in (n-6)-PUFA, n = 20] as the principal source of fat for 4 wk. Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a small, but significant reduction in LDL size during the oil diet phase (-0.36 nm, P = 0.012), which did not differ significantly among the three groups (P = 0.384). Furthermore, affiliation with one of the three diet groups did not contribute significantly to the observed variation in LDL size (P = 0.690). In conclusion, our data indicate that dietary unsaturated fat similarly reduces LDL size relative to saturated fat. However, the small magnitude of this reduction also suggests that the composition of dietary fat is not a major factor affecting LDL size. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Epidemiologic and clinical studies have shown that nut consumption is associated with favorable plasma lipid profiles and reduced cardiovascular risk. These effects may result from their high monounsaturated fat (MUFA) content but nuts contain constituents other than fatty acids that might be cardioprotective. We conducted a study to compare the effects of whole-almond vs. almond oil consumption on plasma lipids and LDL oxidation in healthy men and women. Using a randomized crossover trial design, 22 normolipemic men and women replaced half of their habitual fat (approximately 14% of approximately 29% energy) with either whole almonds (WA) or almond oil (AO) for 6-wk periods. Compliance was ascertained by monitoring dietary intake via biweekly 5-d food records, return of empty almond product packages and weekly meetings with a registered dietitian. Fat replacement with either WA and AO resulted in a 54% increase in percentage of energy as MUFA with declines in both saturated fat and cholesterol intake and no significant changes in total energy, total or polyunsaturated fat intake. The effects of WA and AO on plasma lipids did not differ compared with baseline; plasma triglyceride, total and LDL cholesterol significantly decreased, 14, 4 and 6% respectively, whereas HDL cholesterol increased 6%. Neither treatment affected in vitro LDL oxidizability. We conclude that WA and AO do not differ in their beneficial effects on the plasma lipid variables measured and that this suggests that the favorable effect of almonds is mediated by components in the oil fraction of these nuts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We evaluated the ability of a biological marker (nitrogen excretion expressed as protein) to accurately reflect the protein intake of 12 healthy subjects consuming a low protein diet (0.6 g protein/kg standard body wt). In this crossover study, protein intake was confirmed by chemically analyzing a duplicate of the constant diet each subject consumed for 3 d and by calculating protein content of self-selected diets recorded during two additional 3-d periods. Diet analysis matched excretion (difference 0.03 +/- 0.04 g protein/kg standard body wt, means +/- SEM). Self-selected intake manually calculated by subjects using educational materials matched the prescription [0.60 (0.42, 0.86) g protein/kg standard body wt, median (range)], but underestimated excretion by 0.18 +/- 0.02 g protein/kg standard body wt (means +/- SEM). Self-selected intake recalculated by the authors using a computerized database was only +0.05 (-0.08, +0.44) g protein/kg standard body wt higher than subjects' calculations, suggesting that discrepancies between databases and/or subject calculation errors only partially accounted for how greatly self-selected intake underestimated excretion. In a secondary analysis of self-selected intake, the three dietitian subjects consumed more energy and excreted less protein than nondietitians (137 +/- 4.9 vs. 94 +/- 3.5 kJ/standard body wt; 0.72 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.83 +/- 0.02 g protein/kg standard body wt), suggesting that adequate energy intake and/or additional training might improve agreement between intake and excretion. Thus, discrepancies between protein excretion and reported intake may reflect factors other than willful noncompliance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]