1. The Effects of Shared Decision Making on Different Renal Replacement Therapy Decisions in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.
- Author
-
HO, Ya-Fang, CHEN, Yu-Chi, HUANG, Chiu-Chin, HU, Wen-Yu, LIN, Kuan-Chia, and LI, I-Chuan
- Subjects
- *
TREATMENT of chronic kidney failure , *CHI-squared test , *CLINICAL trials , *COMPARATIVE studies , *DECISION making , *FISHER exact test , *INTERVIEWING , *KIDNEY diseases , *RESEARCH methodology , *QUESTIONNAIRES , *STATISTICS , *T-test (Statistics) , *THERAPEUTICS , *JUDGMENT sampling , *DATA analysis , *SYMPTOMS , *TREATMENT effectiveness , *PRE-tests & post-tests , *EVALUATION of human services programs , *DATA analysis software , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics - Abstract
Background: The prevalence and incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Taiwan are the highest of any country in the world. The different renal replacement therapies that are adopted by patients with ESRD significantly affect their social roles and daily life. However, because of the complexities of different renal replacement therapies, patients may be unsure of which to choose. Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness of a shared decision-making (SDM) program regarding different renal replacement therapies for patients with chronic kidney disease. Methods: A quasi-experimental design was conducted at two similar regional hospitals in Miaoli County, Taiwan. One hospital hosted the intervention group, and the other hospital hosted the control group. The 31 participants in the intervention group took part in a SDM program. The 36 control group participants took part in the pre-ESRD care program. Data collection included demographic and disease characteristics, decisional conflict scale, and decision self-efficacy scale. Results were analyzed using independent t test, Fisher's exact test, generalized estimating equation, and paired t tests. Results: The study results revealed that the intervention group experienced a significant increase in decision self-efficacy and a significant decrease in decisional conflict at 1 month after receiving the SDM intervention in comparison to before and immediately after receiving the intervention. Moreover, the intervention group had higher decision self-efficacy and lower decisional conflict than the control group. Conclusions/Implications for Practice: The SDM program may be an effective intervention for complex decision-making processes, such as the process involved in making renal replacement treatment decisions. The SDM program group intervention improved decisional conflict and decision self-efficacy. Thus, to improve patients' decision-making processes, the application of an SDM program focused on the personal values and opinions of patients with ESRD will be necessary. Physicians and case managers of patients with ESRD should act in complementary and cooperative roles in SDM programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF