Search

In the retina, modulation of the amplitude of dim visual signals primarily occurs at axon terminals of rod bipolar cells (RBCs). GABA and glycine inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors and the excitatory amino acid transporter 5 (EAAT5) modulate the RBC output. EAATs clear glutamate from the synapse, but they also have a glutamate-gated chloride conductance. EAAT5 acts primarily as an inhibitory glutamate-gated chloride channel. The relative role of visually evoked EAAT5 inhibition compared with GABA and glycine inhibition has not been addressed. In this study, we determine the contribution of EAAT5-mediated inhibition onto RBCs in response to light stimuli in mouse retinal slices. We find differences and similarities in the two forms of inhibition. Our results show that GABA and glycine mediate nearly all lateral inhibition onto RBCs, as EAAT5 is solely a mediator of RBC feedback inhibition. We also find that EAAT5 and conventional GABA inhibition both contribute to feedback inhibition at all stimulus intensities. Finally, our in silico modeling compares and contrasts EAAT5-mediated to GABA- and glycine-mediated feedback inhibition. Both forms of inhibition have a substantial impact on synaptic transmission to the postsynaptic AII amacrine cell. Our results suggest that the late phase EAAT5 inhibition acts with the early phase conventional, reciprocal GABA inhibition to modulate the rod signaling pathway between rod bipolar cells and their downstream synaptic targets. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Excitatory amino acid transporter 5 (EAAT5) glutamate transporters have a chloride channel that is strongly activated by glutamate, which modulates excitatory signaling. We found that EAAT5 is a major contributor to feedback inhibition on rod bipolar cells. Inhibition to rod bipolar cells is also mediated by GABA and glycine. GABA and glycine mediate the early phase of feedback inhibition, and EAAT5 mediates a more delayed inhibition. Together, inhibitory transmitters and EAAT5 coordinate to mediate feedback inhibition, controlling neuronal output.

The retina is the first stage of visual processing. It encodes elemental features of visual scenes. Distinct cone bipolar cells provide the substrate for this to occur. They encode visual information, such as color and luminance, a principle known as parallel processing. Few studies have directly examined whether different forms of spatial information are processed in parallel among cone bipolar cells. To address this issue, we examined the spatial information encoded by mouse ON cone bipolar cells, the subpopulation excited by increments in illumination. Two types of spatial processing were identified. We found that ON cone bipolar cells with axons ramifying in the central inner plexiform layer were tuned to preferentially encode small stimuli. By contrast, ON cone bipolar cells with axons ramifying in the proximal inner plexiform layer, nearest the ganglion cell layer, were tuned to encode both small and large stimuli. This dichotomy in spatial tuning is attributable to amacrine cells providing stronger inhibition to central ON cone bipolar cells compared with proximal ON cone bipolar cells. Furthermore, background illumination altered this difference in spatial tuning. It became less pronounced in bright light, as amacrine cell-driven inhibition became pervasive among all ON cone bipolar cells. These results suggest that differential amacrine cell input determined the distinct spatial encoding properties among ON cone bipolar cells. These findings enhance the known parallel processing capacity of the retina., (Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.)

While connections between inhibitory interneurons are common circuit elements, it has been difficult to define their signal processing roles because of the inability to activate these circuits using natural stimuli. We overcame this limitation by studying connections between inhibitory amacrine cells in the retina. These interneurons form spatially extensive inhibitory networks that shape signaling between bipolar cell relay neurons to ganglion cell output neurons. We investigated how amacrine cell networks modulate these retinal signals by selectively activating the networks with spatially defined light stimuli. The roles of amacrine cell networks were assessed by recording their inhibitory synaptic outputs in bipolar cells that suppress bipolar cell output to ganglion cells. When the amacrine cell network was activated by large light stimuli, the inhibitory connections between amacrine cells unexpectedly depressed bipolar cell inhibition. Bipolar cell inhibition elicited by smaller light stimuli or electrically activated feedback inhibition was not suppressed because these stimuli did not activate the connections between amacrine cells. Thus the activation of amacrine cell circuits with large light stimuli can shape the spatial sensitivity of the retina by limiting the spatial extent of bipolar cell inhibition. Because inner retinal inhibition contributes to ganglion cell surround inhibition, in part, by controlling input from bipolar cells, these connections may refine the spatial properties of the retinal output. This functional role of interneuron connections may be repeated throughout the CNS.

Synaptic integration is modulated by inhibition onto the dendrites of postsynaptic cells. However, presynaptic inhibition at axonal terminals also plays a critical role in the regulation of neurotransmission. In contrast to the development of inhibitory synapses onto dendrites, GABAergic/glycinergic synaptogenesis onto axon terminals has not been widely studied. Because retinal bipolar cells receive subclass-specific patterns of GABAergic and glycinergic presynaptic inhibition, they are a good model for studying the development of inhibition at axon terminals. Here, using whole cell recording methods and transgenic mice in which subclasses of retinal bipolar cells are labeled, we determined the temporal sequence and patterning of functional GABAergic and glycinergic input onto the major subclasses of bipolar cells. We found that the maturation of GABAergic and glycinergic synapses onto the axons of rod bipolar cells (RBCs), on-cone bipolar cells (ON-CBCs) and off-cone bipolar cells (OFF-CBCs) were temporally distinct: spontaneous chloride-mediated currents are present in RBCs earlier in development compared with ON- and OFF-CBC, and RBCs receive GABAergic and glycinergic input simultaneously, whereas in OFF-CBCs, glycinergic transmission emerges before GABAergic transmission. Because on-CBCs show little inhibitory activity, GABAergic and glycinergic events could not be pharmacologically distinguished for these bipolar cells. The balance of GABAergic and glycinergic input that is unique to RBCs and OFF-CBCs is established shortly after the onset of synapse formation and precedes visual experience. Our data suggest that presynaptic modulation of glutamate transmission from bipolar cells matures rapidly and is differentially coordinated for GABAergic and glycinergic synapses onto distinct bipolar cell subclasses.

Mutations in the NYX gene that encodes the protein nyctalopin cause congenital stationary night blindness type 1. In no b-wave (nob) mice, a mutation in Nyx results in a functional phenotype that includes the absence of the electroretinogram b-wave and abnormal spontaneous and light-evoked activity in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). In contrast, there is no morphological abnormality in the retina at either the light or electron microscopic levels. These functional deficits suggest that nyctalopin is required for normal synaptic transmission between retinal photoreceptors and depolarizing bipolar cells (DBCs). However, the synaptic etiology and, specifically, the exact location and function of nyctalopin, remain uncertain. We show that nob DBCs fail to respond to exogenous application of the photoreceptor neurotransmitter, glutamate, thus demonstrating a postsynaptic deficit in photoreceptor to bipolar cell communication. To determine if postsynaptic expression of nyctalopin is necessary and sufficient to rescue the nob phenotype, we constructed transgenic mice that expressed an EYFP-nyctalopin fusion protein on the dendritic tips of the DBCs. Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural studies verified that fusion protein expression was limited to the DBC dendritic tips. Fusion gene expression in nob mice restored normal outer and inner visual function as determined by the electroretinogram and RGC spontaneous and evoked responses. Together, our data show that nyctalopin expression on DBC dendrites is required for normal function of the murine retina.

The inhibitory surround signal in retinal ganglion cells is usually attributed to lateral horizontal cell signaling in the outer plexiform layer (OPL). However, recent evidence suggests that lateral inhibition at the inner plexiform layer (IPL) also contributes to the ganglion cell receptive field surround. Although amacrine cell input to ganglion cells mediates a component of this lateral inhibition, it is not known if presynaptic inhibition to bipolar cell terminals also contributes to surround signaling. We investigated the role of presynaptic inhibition by recording from bipolar cells in the salamander retinal slice. TTX reduced light-evoked GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) in bipolar cells, indicating that presynaptic pathways mediate lateral inhibition in the IPL. Photoreceptor and bipolar cell synaptic transmission were unaffected by TTX, indicating that its main effect was in the IPL. To rule out indirect actions of TTX, we bypassed lateral signaling in the outer retina by either electrically stimulating bipolar cells or by puffing kainate (KA) directly onto amacrine cell processes lateral to the recorded cell. In bipolar and ganglion cells, TTX suppressed laterally evoked IPSCs, demonstrating that both pre- and postsynaptic lateral signaling in the IPL depended on action potentials. By contrast, locally evoked IPSCs in both cell types were only weakly suppressed by TTX, indicating that local inhibition was not as dependent on action potentials. Our results show a TTX-sensitive lateral inhibitory input to bipolar cell terminals, which acts in concert with direct lateral inhibition to give rise to the GABAergic surround in ganglion cells.

Evidence from toxicological studies suggested that an ionotropic GABA receptor of novel pharmacology (picrotoxin-insensitive, bicuculline-sensitive) exists in the chick embryo retina. In this report, we provide direct morphological and electrophysiological evidence for the existence of such an iGABA receptor. Chick embryo retinas (14-16 days old) incubated in the presence of kainic acid showed pronounced histopathology in all retinal layers. Maximal protection from this toxicity required a combination of bicuculline and picrotoxin. Individual application of the antagonists indicated that a picrotoxin-insensitive, bicuculline-sensitive GABA receptor is likely to be present on ganglion and amacrine, but not bipolar, cells. GABA currents in embryonic and mature chicken retinal neurons were measured by whole cell patch clamp. GABA was puffed at the dendritic processes in the IPL. Picrotoxin (500 microM, in the bath) eliminated all (>95%) the GABA current in the majority of ganglion and amacrine cells tested, but many cells possessed a substantial picrotoxin-insensitive component. This current was eliminated by bicuculline (200 microM). This current was not a transporter-associated current, since it was not altered by GABA transport blockers or sodium removal. The current-voltage relation was linear and reversed near E(Cl), as expected for a ligand-gated chloride current. Both pentobarbital and lorazepam enhanced the picrotoxin-insensitive current. We conclude that chicken retinal ganglion and amacrine cells express a GABA receptor that is GABA-A-like, in that it can be blocked by bicuculline, and positively modulated by barbiturates and benzodiazepines, but is insensitive to the noncompetitive blocker picrotoxin. Understanding the molecular properties of this receptor will be important for understanding both physiological GABA neurotransmission and the pathology of GABA receptor overactivation.

This study addresses how gamma-aminobutyric acid-A(GABAA) and GABAC receptors confer distinct temporal properties to neuronal synaptic responses. The retina is a model system for the study of postsynaptic contributions to synaptic responses because GABAergic amacrine cells synapse onto neurons, which have different combinations of GABAA and GABAC receptors. It is not known, however, how GABAA versus GABAC receptors influence the time course of retinal synaptic responses or what proportion of inhibitory input is mediated by each receptor type. We examined the time courses of synaptic responses mediated by GABA receptors in ganglion and bipolar cells by recording currents evoked by activating amacrine cells with a stimulating electrode in the salamander retinal slice. The pharmacologically isolated, GABAergic synaptic currents were long-lasting in bipolar cells and relatively brief in ganglion cells. The receptors that mediated these temporally distinct synaptic responses exhibited different pharmacological properties. In ganglion cells, GABAergic synaptic currents were abolished by the GABAA receptor antagonists bicuculline or SR95531. In bipolar cells, the GABAC receptor antagonist 3-aminopropyl[methyl]phosphonic acid (3-APMPA) largely blocked GABAergic synaptic responses; the remaining response was blocked by bicuculline or SR95531. The GABAA receptor component of the bipolar cell response was relatively brief compared with the GABAC receptor component. Puffing GABA onto ganglion cell dendrites or bipolar cell terminals yielded similar pharmacological and kinetic results, indicating that transmitter release differences did not determine the response time courses. Moreover, the GABAC receptors on bipolar cells may be different from those reported in rat or fish retina because imidazole-4-acetic acid (I4AA), which acts as an antagonist in these preparations, acts as an agonist in salamander. Our data show that the prolonged synaptic responses in bipolar cells were mediated predominantly by GABAC receptors, whereas transient synaptic responses in ganglion cells were mediated by GABAA receptors.

Pharmacological studies were performed to determine whether alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoazoleprionic acid (AMPA)- and/or kainate (KA)-preferring receptors mediate excitatory synaptic inputs to tiger salamander retinal ganglion cells. Excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs), evoked either by light or by stimulating bipolar cells with puffs of K+, were measured using whole cell recording techniques in the tiger salamander retinal slice. The AMPA/KA component of the EPSCs was isolated by including antagonists of glycine-, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)- and NMDA-receptors in the bath. The AMPA-preferring receptor antagonists, 1-(4-aminophenyl)-4-methyl-7,8-methylenedioxy-5H-2,3-benzodiazepine hydrochloride (GYKI-52466) and 1-(4-aminophenyl)-3-methylcarbamyl-4-methyl-7,8-methylenedioxy-3,4 - dihydro-5H-2,3-benzodiazepine (GYKI-53665), reduced light-evoked EPSCs and K+ puff-evoked EPSCs amplitudes in a concentration-dependent manner. The IC50 values for GYKI-52466 were 3.6 and 4.2 microM for the light- and puff-evoked responses, respectively. The more potent GYKI-53665 had IC50 values of 0.7 microM for both the light- and puff evoked responses. KA activates both KA- and AMPA-preferring receptors. KA-evoked currents were completely blocked by 10-40 microM GYKI-53665, indicating that little or no excitatory synaptic current was mediated by KA-preferring receptors. Concanavalin A, a compound that preferentially potentiates responses mediated by KA-preferring receptors, did not enhance either EPSCs or glutamate-evoked responses. By contrast, cyclothiazide, which selectively enhances AMPA-preferring receptor mediated responses, was found to enhance both EPSCs and glutamate-evoked currents. Our results indicate that the non-NMDA component of ganglion cell EPSCs is mediated by AMPA-preferring receptors and not significantly by KA-preferring receptors.