Search

Previous studies using muscimol inactivations in the frontal eye fields (FEFs) have shown that saccades generated by recall from working memory are eliminated by these lesions, whereas visually guided saccades are relatively spared. In these experiments, we made reversible inactivations in FEFs in alert macaque monkeys and examined the effect on saccades in a choice response task. Our task required monkeys to learn arbitrary pairings between colored stimuli and saccade direction. Following inactivations, the percentage of choice errors increased as a function of the number of alternative (NA) pairings. In contrast, the percentage of dysmetric saccades (saccades that landed in the correct quadrant but were inaccurate) did not vary with NA. Saccade latency increased postlesion but did not increase with NA. We also made simultaneous inactivations in both FEFs. The results following bilateral lesions showed approximately twice as many choice errors. We conclude that the FEFs are involved in the generation of saccades in choice response tasks. The dramatic effect of NA on choice errors, but the lack of an effect of NA on motor errors or response latency, suggests that two types of processing are interrupted by FEF lesions. The first involves the formation of a saccadic intention vector from associate memory inputs, and the second, the execution of the saccade from the intention vector. An alternative interpretation of the first result is that a role of the FEFs may be to suppress incorrect responses. The doubling of choice errors following bilateral FEF lesions suggests that the effect of unilateral lesions is not caused by a general inhibition of the lesioned side by the intact side.

Recent evidence implicates the superior colliculus (SC) in cognitive processes, such as target selection and control of spatial attention, in addition to the execution of saccadic eye movements. We report here the presence of a cognitive response in some cells in the SC in a task that requires the long-term association of spatial location with an arbitrary color. In this study, using a visual choice response task, we demonstrate that visuomotor neurons in the SC were activated by the appearance of a central symbolic cue delivered outside of the visual response fields of the recorded neurons. This procedure ensures that cognitively generated activity in these SC cells is not confounded with modulation of activity from previous visual stimuli that appeared in the response field of the neurons. The experiments suggest that cognitive signals can activate SC cells by themselves instead of only being able to modulate activities already evoked by visual events. Furthermore, a substantial fraction of these cells accurately reflected cue-aligned target selection in advance of saccade initiation. Our results add further support to other studies that have demonstrated that internally generated signals exist in SC cells.

Important insights into the neural organization of the saccadic system have been gained when the usually stereotyped movement trajectories of saccades have been altered by experimental manipulation. In the present study we produced trajectory variability in monkeys by using a visual search task in which both the location and color of an odd-colored target were changed randomly trial by trial, and the number of distractors was varied on each trial. We wished to determine whether increasing the number of distractors also increased the movement trajectory variation, i.e., the amount of initial directional deviation, endpoint deviation (averaging), and curvature of saccades. Overall, saccade latencies and the proportion of saccades directed to distractors decreased as the number of homogenous distractors increased. We also found that saccades have much more dispersion in their initial direction when distractors are present in comparison to the case when only a single target without distractors appears. However, initial dispersion decreases systematically as the number of distractors increases. The percentage of averaging saccades produced in the search task was not consistently dependent on the number of distractors. A significant fraction of averaging saccades still occurred for much wider spatial separations of stimuli than in previous studies using two visual stimuli with no specified target. The curvature of saccade trajectories increased dramatically when distractors were present, but the amount of curvature was not systematically affected by the number of distractors. Errors present in saccade trajectory in the search task were only poorly compensated. We conclude that these variable saccade trajectories result from incomplete or inaccurate specification of the target when competing stimuli are present and that a smaller number of more widely spread distractors facilitate saccade variability, perhaps due to the greater difficulty of target selection.

When saccadic eye movements are made in a search task that requires selecting a target from distractors, the movements show greater curvature in their trajectories than similar saccades made to single stimuli. To test the hypothesis that this increase in curvature arises from competitive interactions between saccade goals occurring near the time of movement onset, we performed single-unit recording and microstimulation experiments in the superior colliculus (SC). We found that saccades that ended near the target but curved toward a distractor were accompanied by increased presaccadic activity of SC neurons coding the distractor site. This increased activity occurred approximately 30 ms before saccade onset and was abruptly quenched on saccade initiation. The magnitude of increased activity at the distractor site was correlated with the amount of curvature toward the distractor. In contrast, neurons coding the target location did not show any significant difference in discharge for curved versus straight saccades. To determine whether this pattern of SC discharge is causally related to saccade curvature, we performed a second series of experiments using electrical microstimulation. Monkeys made saccades to single visual stimuli presented without distractors, and we stimulated sites in the SC that would have corresponded to distractor sites in the search task. The stimulation was subthreshold for evoking saccades, but when its temporal structure mimicked the activity recorded for curved saccades in search, the subsequent saccades to the visual target showed curvature toward the location coded by the stimulation site. The effect was larger for higher stimulation frequencies and when the stimulation site was in the same colliculus as the representation of the visual target. These results support the hypothesis that the increased saccade curvature observed in search arises from rivalry between target and distractor goals and are consistent with the idea that the SC is involved in the competitive neural interactions underlying saccade target selection.

Because real-world scenes typically contain many different potential objects of interest, selecting one goal from many is clearly a fundamental problem faced by the saccadic system. We recorded from visual, movement, and visuo-movement (VM) neurons in the superior colliculus (SC) of monkeys performing a reaction-time visual-search task requiring them to make saccades to an odd-colored target presented with distractors. First, we compared the responses of SC neurons in search with their responses when a single target was presented without distractors (single-stimulus task). Consistent with earlier reports, initial visual activity was smaller in search than in the single-stimulus task, while movement-related activity in the two tasks was comparable. Further experiments showed that much of the reduction in the initial visual response during search was due to lateral inhibition, although a top-down task-related component was also evident. Although the initial visual activity did not discriminate the target from the distractors, some neurons showed a biphasic pattern of visual activity. In VM burst neurons, the second phase of this activity was significantly larger when the target, rather than a distractor, was in the response field. We traced the time course of target/distractor discrimination using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and found that VM burst neurons, VM prelude neurons, and pure movement neurons discriminated the target from distractors before saccade onset but that phasic and tonic pure visual neurons did not. We also examined the relationship between target/distractor discrimination time and saccade latency. Discrimination in VM burst neurons having a biphasic pattern of visual activity and in many VM prelude neurons occurred after a consistent delay that did not depend on saccade latency, suggesting that these neurons are involved in target selection as well as movement initiation. In contrast, VM burst neurons lacking a biphasic pattern of visual activity, pure movement neurons, and a subset of VM prelude neurons discriminated the target at a time that was well correlated with saccade latency, suggesting that this latter group of neurons is involved in triggering movement execution but not in target selection. Thus a mix of signals likely related to target selection and movement initiation co-exists in different groups of SC neurons. This suggests that certain types of SC neurons participate in the target selection process and that the SC as a whole represents a gateway for target selection signals to be converted into a saccadic command.

The premotor pathways subserving saccades and smooth-pursuit eye movements are usually thought to be different. Indeed, saccade and smooth-pursuit eye movements have different dynamics and functions. In particular, a group of midline cells in the pons called omnipause neurons (OPNs) are considered to be part of the saccadic system only. It has been established that OPNs keep premotor neurons for saccades under constant inhibition during fixation periods. Saccades occur only when the activity of OPNs has completely stopped or paused. Accordingly, electrical stimulation in the region of OPNs inhibits premotor neurons and interrupts saccades. The premotor relay for smooth pursuit is thought to be organized differently and omnipause neurons are not supposed to be involved in smooth-pursuit eye movements. To investigate this supposition, OPNs were recorded during saccades and during smooth pursuit in the monkey (Macaca mulatta). Unexpectedly, we found that neuronal activity of OPNs decreased during smooth pursuit. The resulting activity reduction reached statistical significance in approximately 50% of OPNs recorded during pursuit of a target moving at 40 degrees /s. On average, activity was reduced by 34% but never completely stopped or paused. The onset of activity reduction coincided with the onset of smooth pursuit. The duration of activity reduction was correlated with pursuit duration and its intensity was correlated with eye velocity. Activity reduction was observed even in the absence of catch-up saccades that frequently occur during pursuit. Electrical microstimulation in the OPNs' area induced a strong deceleration of the eye during smooth pursuit. These results suggest that OPNs form an inhibitory mechanism that could control the time course of smooth pursuit. This inhibitory mechanism is part of the fixation system and is probably needed to avoid reflexive eye movements toward targets that are not purposefully selected. This study shows that saccades and smooth pursuit, although they are different kinds of eye movements, are controlled by the same inhibitory system.

Saccades are typically separated by inter-saccadic fixation intervals (ISFIs) of > or =125 ms. During this time, the saccadic system selects a goal and completes the preparatory processes required prior to executing the subsequent movement. However, in tasks in which competing stimuli are presented, two sequentially executed movements to different goals can be separated by much shorter ISFIs. This suggests that the saccadic system is capable of completing many of the preparatory requirements for a second saccade concurrently with the execution of an initial movement. We recorded single neurons in the superior colliculus (SC) during rapid saccade sequences made by rhesus monkeys performing a search task. We found that during the execution of an initial saccade, activity related to the goal of a quickly following second saccade can be simultaneously maintained in the SC motor map. This activity appears to signal the selection or increased salience of the second saccade goal even before the initial saccade has ended. For movements separated by normal ISFIs (> or =125 ms), we did not observe activity related to concurrent processing, presumably because for these longer ISFI responses, the goal of the second saccade is not selected until after the end of the first saccade. These results indicate that, at the time of an initial saccade, the SC does not necessarily act as a strict winner-take-all network. Rather it appears that the salience of a second visual goal can be simultaneously maintained in the SC. This provides evidence that selection or preparatory activity related to the goal of a second saccade can overlap temporally with activity related to an initial saccade and indicates that such concurrent processing is present even in a structure which is fairly close to the motor output.

Direct projections from the superior colliculus (SC) to the paramedian pontine reticular formation (PPRF) have been demonstrated anatomically. The PPRF contains cells called excitatory burst neurons (EBNs) that execute the final premotoneuronal processing for saccadic eye movements, as well as other burst cells called long-lead burst neurons (LLBNs). Previous electrophysiological tests in monkey have failed to find evidence for monosynaptic connections from the SC to EBNs, but have shown that direct projections to LLBNs exist. The validity of these results has been questioned because EBNs are known to be inhibited during periods of fixation by cells called omnipause neurons (OPNs). In later experiments in cat, the stimulus in the SC was triggered during saccades (when OPNs are off) and direct connections to EBNs were found. The present experiments were conducted to determine whether direct connections from the SC to EBNs could be demonstrated in monkey. LLBNs located near EBNs were also recorded. Single-pulse stimuli were delivered at sites in the SC at current levels well above those required to evoke saccades with pulse train stimuli. The stimuli were triggered shortly after the onset of ipsilateral or contralateral saccades and also slightly after the end of saccades. A sample of 21 EBNs was recorded and none were activated by postsaccadic stimulation or during contralateral saccades. The high spontaneous discharge rates of EBNs during ipsilateral saccades made activation of these cells more difficult to detect; however, when the results were quantified by peristimulus time histograms aligned on stimulus onset, only 1/21 EBNs showed evidence of activation in the monosynaptic range of latencies (<1.6 ms), 13 EBNs were activated at di- or polysynaptic latencies, and 7 were not activated. In contrast, 15/21 LLBNs were activated with latencies in the monosynaptic range. Further evidence supporting the absence of direct connections to EBNs was obtained by realigning the peristimulus time histograms for a subset of EBNs with similar firing rates on the time of occurrence of the last spike before stimulus onset. A subset of EBNs was also studied during drowsy ipsilaterally directed eye drifts, during which these cells were firing at low spontaneous rates and OPNs were off. No evidence for direct connections to EBNs was found in this behavioral state. The variance in results obtained for cat and monkey may be due to a species difference that reflects the more complex signal processing required in the monkey's saccadic system.

Over the past decade, considerable research efforts have been focused on the role of the rostral superior colliculus (SC) in control of saccades. The most recent theory separates the deeper intermediate layers of the SC into two functional regions: the rostral pole of these layers constitutes a fixation zone and the caudal region comprises the saccade zone. Sustained activity of fixation neurons in the fixation zone is argued to maintain fixation and help prevent saccade generation by exciting the omnipause neurons (OPNs) in the brain stem. This hypothesis is in contrast to the traditional view that the SC contains a topographic representation of the saccade motor map on which the rostral pole of the SC encodes signals for generating small saccades (<2 degrees ) instead of preventing them. There is therefore an unresolved controversy about the specific role on the most rostral region of the SC, and we reexamined its functional contribution by quantifying and comparing spatial and temporal trajectories of 30 degrees saccades perturbed by electrical stimulation of the rostral pole and more caudal regions in the SC and of the OPN region. If the rostral pole serves to preserve fixation, then saccades perturbed by stimulation should closely resemble interrupted saccades produced by stimulation of the OPN region. If it also contributes to saccade generation, then the disrupted movements would better compare with redirected saccades observed after stimulation of the caudal SC. Our experiments revealed two significant findings: 1) the locus of stimulation was the primary factor determining the perturbation effect. If the directions of the target-directed saccade and stimulation-evoked saccade were aligned and if the stimulation was delivered within approximately the rostral 2 mm (<10 degrees amplitude) of SC, the ongoing saccade stopped in midflight but then resumed after stimulation end to reach the original visually specified goal with close to normal accuracy. When stimulation was applied at more caudal sites, the ongoing saccade directly reached the target location without stopping at an intermediate position. If the directions differed considerably, both initial and resumed components were typically observed for all stimulation sites. 2) A quantitative analysis of the saccades perturbed from the fixation zone showed significant deviations from their control spatial trajectories. Thus they resembled redirected saccades induced by caudal SC stimulation and differed significantly from interrupted saccades produced by OPN stimulation. The amplitude of the initial saccade, latency of perturbation, and spatial redirection were greatest for the most caudal sites and decreased gradually for rostral sites. For stimulation sites within the rostral pole of SC, the measures formed a smooth continuation of the trends observed in the saccade zone. As these results argue for the saccade zone concept, we offer reinterpretations of the data used to support the fixation zone model. However, we also discuss scenarios that do not allow an outright rejection of the fixation zone hypothesis.

Stimulation of the rostral approximately 2 mm of the superior colliculus (SC) during a large, visual target-initiated saccade produces a spatial deviation of the ongoing saccade and then stops it in midflight. After the termination of the stimulation, the saccade resumes and ends near the location of the flashed target. The density of collicular projections to the omnipause neuron (OPN) region is greatest from the rostral SC and decreases gradually for the more caudal regions. It has been hypothesized that the microstimulation excites the OPNs through these direct connections, and the reactivation of OPNs, which are normally silent during saccades, stops the initial component in midflight by gating off the saccadic burst generator. Two predictions emerge from this hypothesis: 1) for microstimulation triggered on the onset of large saccades, the time from stimulation onset to resumption of OPN discharge should decrease as the stimulation site is moved rostral and 2) the lead time from reactivation of OPNs to the end of the initial saccade on stimulation trials should be equal to the lead time of pause end with respect to the end of control saccades. We tested this hypothesis by recording OPN activity during saccades perturbed by stimulation of the rostral approximately 2 mm of the SC. The distance of the stimulation site from the most rostral extent of the SC and the time of reactivation with respect to stimulation onset were not significantly correlated. The mean lead of reactivation of OPNs relative to the end of the initial component of perturbed saccades (6.5 ms) was significantly less than the mean lead with respect to the end of control (9.6 ms) and resumed saccades (10.4 ms). These results do not support the notion that the excitatory input from SC neurons-in particular, the fixation neurons in the rostral SC-provide the major signal to reactivate OPNs and end saccades. An alternative, conceptual model to explain the temporal sequence of events induced by stimulation of the SC during large saccades is presented. Other OPN activity parameters also were measured and compared for control and stimulation conditions. The onset of pause with respect to resumed saccade onset was larger and more variable than the onset of pause with respect to control saccades, whereas pause end with respect to the end of resumed and control saccades was similar. The reactivated discharge of OPNs during the period between the end of the initial and the onset of the resumed saccades was at least as strong as that following control movements. This latter observation is interpreted in terms of the resettable neural integrator hypothesis.

To help understand how complex visual stimuli are processed into short-latency saccade motor programs, the activity of visuomotor neurons in the deeper layers of the superior colliculus was recorded while two monkeys made express saccades to one target and to two targets. It has been shown previously that the visual response and perimotor discharge characteristic of visuomotor neurons temporally coalesce into a single burst of discharge for express saccades. Here we seek to determine whether the distributed visual response to two targets spatially coalesces into a command appropriate for the resulting saccade. Two targets were presented at identical radial eccentricities separated in direction by 45 degrees. A gap paradigm was used to elicit express saccades. Express saccades were more likely to land in between the two targets than were saccades of longer latency. The speeds of express saccades to two targets were similar to those of one target of similar vector, as were the trajectories of saccades to one and two targets. The movement fields for express saccades to two targets were more broad than those for saccades to one target for all neurons studied. For most neurons, the spatial pattern of discharge for saccades to two targets was better explained as a scaled version of the visual response to two spatially separate targets than as a scaled version of the perimotor response accompanying a saccade to a single target. Only the discharge of neurons with large movement fields could be equally well explained as a visual response to two targets or as a perimotor response for a one-target saccade. For most neurons, the spatial properties of discharge depended on the number of targets throughout the entire saccade-related burst. These results suggest that for express saccades to two targets the computation of saccade vector is not complete at the level of the superior colliculus for most neurons and an explicit process of target selection is not necessary at this level for the programming of an express saccade.

The two-dimensional distribution of population activity in the superior colliculus (SC) during saccadic eye movements in the monkey was estimated using radial basis functions. To make these ensemble activity estimates, cells in the deeper layers of the SC were recorded over much of the rostrocaudal (caudal to 3.8 mm from the rostral tip), mediolateral extent of this structure. The dynamic movement field of each cell was determined at 2-ms intervals around the time of saccades for a wide variety of horizontal and oblique movements. Collicular neurons were divided into partially overlapping dorsal and ventral cell layers on the basis of recorded depth in SC. The pattern of presaccadic activity was used as an additional discriminant to sort the cells in the two layers into separate burst (dorsal) and buildup (ventral) cell classes. Rostrocaudal and medioventral cell location on the colliculus was estimated from the optimal target vector for a cell's visual response rather than from the optimal motor vector. The former technique was more reliable for locating some buildup neurons because it produced locations that compared better with the locations suggested by electrical stimulation. From the movement field data and from the estimates of each cell's anatomic location, a similar algorithm was used to compute the two-dimensional population activity in the two layers of the SC during horizontal and oblique saccades. A subset of the sample of neurons, located near the horizontal meridian of the SC, first was used to compute one-dimensional dynamic population activity estimates for horizontal saccades to allow partial comparison to previous studies. Statistical analyses on the one-dimensional data were limited to saccades of

One proposed role of the superior colliculus (SC) in oculomotor control is to suppress or excite the activity of brain stem omnipause neurons (OPNs) to initiate or terminate saccades, respectively. Although connections from the SC to the OPNs have been demonstrated, the spatial distribution and discharge characteristics of the projecting neurons from the SC remain unknown. We mapped the spatial distribution of the deeper-layer neurons of the SC by stimulating the region of the OPNs to identify antidromic projections and found that the density of direct projections from the SC to the OPNs was greatest in the most rostral region and decreased gradually for more caudal sites. On the basis of saccade-related discharge characteristics, the antidromically driven neurons were predominantly fixation and buildup neurons. The spatially distributed SC projections to the OPNs and the discharge characteristics of the SC neurons suggest that the direct projections from SC to OPNs are excitatory. Finally, we propose how excitation and disfacilitation from SC activity can contribute to modulation of OPN response and control saccades.

1. The discharge of neurons in the deeper layers of the monkey superior colliculus was recorded during saccades made to stationary and to smoothly moving visual targets. 2. All neurons that discharged for saccades made to stationary targets also discharged during saccades made to moving targets, but there was a systematic shift in the saccade vector yielding maximal activity (i.e. center of the movement field) of collicular neurons for the latter class of movements. The shift moved the center of the movement fields toward larger-amplitude pursuit saccades for target motion away from the fovea, in comparison with saccades made to stationary targets. However, the discharge at the center of the movement field for pursuit saccades was 14% lower when averaged over the sample of recorded cells. 3. The saccades made during pursuit tracking of moving visual stimuli have different dynamics than saccades made to stationary targets. At similar amplitudes pursuit saccades are slower, and their velocity profiles often show secondary velocity peaks or inflection points and have longer-duration decelerating phases. 4. The combined experimental observations of a change in saccade dynamics and the shift in movement fields in collicular neurons for pursuit saccades are compatible with the hypothesis that saccades made to moving targets are controlled by neural processing in two partially separate pathways. In this theory, one path is concerned with correction of a presaccadic retinal position error (a path that includes the colliculus) and another path is concerned with position extrapolations based on the velocity of the moving target (a path that does not include the colliculus).

1. We recorded visuomotor burst neurons in the deeper layers of the superior colliculus while two monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) made short-latency saccades known as express saccades to visual targets in order to determine whether the visual discharge normally seen for these cells served as the premotor burst during express saccades. We then compared saccade-related activity during express saccades with that recorded during regular latency saccades and delayed saccades. 2. Saccade latency histograms for two monkeys during trials with a temporal gap between fixation-point offset and target onset showed a distinct peak of saccades around 70-80 ms. One monkey also showed an additional peak around 125 ms. 3. Express saccades were found on the average to have the same relationship of saccade peak velocity to saccade amplitude as regular latency saccades and delayed saccades. Express saccades tended to be somewhat more hypometric than the other classes of saccades. However, express saccades were clearly visually guided and not anticipatory responses. 4. For most cells studied (33/40), express saccades were accompanied by a single, uninterrupted burst of activity beginning 40-50 ms after target onset and continuing until sometime around the end of the saccade. For a smaller group of cells (7/40), two peaks of burst activity were seen, although the second peak was smaller and tended to occur late, after saccade onset. Across all cells, the peak of visuomotor cell activity during express saccades correlated just as well with target onset as it did with saccade onset. 5. When considered as discharge temporally aligned to the onset of the saccade, bursts accompanying express saccades tended to begin at approximately the same time as that for regular and delayed saccades. However, this discharge generally peaked earlier for express than for regular and delayed saccades. Also, the magnitude of discharge for express saccades was higher than that for delayed saccades throughout the burst. 6. When considered as discharge temporally aligned to the appearance of the target, bursts began earlier for express and regular saccade trials than for delayed saccade trials. Peak discharge tended to be greater for express saccades than for the other classes of saccades. 7. The results of this investigation are consistent with the suggestion that the visual burst of visuomotor neurons in the deeper layers of the superior colliculus plays a role in the initiation of express saccades similar to that played by the premotor burst for saccades of longer latency. The elevated discharge for express saccades supports the idea that the superior colliculus plays a more critical role in express saccade generation than in the generation of longer-latency saccades. The elevated discharge also suggests that visuomotor bursters do not code one-to-one for saccade velocity nor for saccade dynamic motor error.

1. We recorded the spatial and temporal dynamics of saccade-related burst neurons (SRBNs) found in the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus (SC) in the alert, behaving monkey. These burst cells are normally the first neurons recorded during radially directed microelectrode penetrations of the SC after the electrode has left the more dorsally situated visual layers. They have spatially delimited movement fields whose centers describe the well-studied motor map of the SC. They have a rather sharp, saccade-locked burst of activity that peaks just before saccade onset and then declines steeply during the saccade. Many of these cells, when recorded during saccade trials, also have an early, transient visual response and an irregular prelude of presaccadic activity. 2. Because saccadic eye movements normally have very stereotyped durations and velocity trajectories that vary systematically with saccade size, it has been difficult in the past to establish quantitatively whether the activity of SRBNs temporally codes dynamic saccadic control signals, e.g., dynamic motor error or eye velocity, where dynamic motor error is defined as a signal proportional to the instantaneous difference between desired final eye position and the actual eye position during a saccade. It has also not been unequivocally established whether SRBNs participate in an organized spatial shift of ensemble activity in the intermediate layers of the SC during saccadic eye movements. 3. To address these issues, we studied the activity of SRBNs using an interrupted saccade paradigm. Saccades were interrupted with pulsatile electrical stimulation through a microelectrode implanted in the omnipauser region of the brain stem while recordings were made simultaneously from single SRBNs in the SC. 4. Shortly after the beginning of the stimulation (which was electronically triggered at saccade onset), the eyes decelerated rapidly and stopped completely. When the high-frequency (typically 300-400 pulses per second) stimulation was terminated (average duration 12 ms), the eye movement was reinitiated and a resumed saccade was made accurately to the location of the target. 5. When we recorded from SRBNs in the more caudal colliculus, which were active for large saccades, cell discharge was powerfully and rapidly suppressed by the stimulation (average latency = 3.8 ms). Activity in the same cells started again just before the onset of the resumed saccade and continued during this saccade even though it has a much smaller amplitude than would normally be associated with significant discharge for caudal SC cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

1. In this study we sought to characterize the visual motion processing that exists in the dorsolateral pontine nucleus (DLPN) and make a comparison with the reported visual responses of the middle temporal (MT) and medial superior temporal (MST) areas of the monkey cerebral cortex. The DLPN is implicated as a component of the visuomotor interface involved with the regulation of smooth-pursuit eye movements, because it is a major terminus for afferents from MT and MST and also the source of efferents to cerebellar regions involved with eye-movement control. 2. Some DLPN cells were preferentially responsive to discrete (spot and bar) visual stimuli, or to large-field, random-dot pattern motion, or to both discrete and large-field visual motion. The results suggest differential input from localized regions of MT and MST. 3. The visual-motion responses of DLPN neurons were direction selective for 86% of the discrete visual responses and 95% of the large-field responses. Direction tuning bandwidths (full-width at 50% maximum response amplitude) averaged 107 degrees and 120 degrees for discrete and large-field visual motion responses, respectively. For the two visual response types, the direction index averaged 0.95 and 1.02, indicating that responses to stimuli moving in preferred directions were, on average, 20 and 50 times greater than responses to discrete or large-field stimulus movement in the opposite directions, respectively. 4. Most of the DLPN visual responses to movements of discrete visual stimuli exhibited increases in amplitude up to preferred retinal image speeds between 20 and 80 degrees/s, with an average preferred speed of 39 degrees/s. At higher speeds, the response amplitude of most units decreased, although a few units exhibited a broad saturation in response amplitude that was maintained up to at least 150 degrees/s before the response decreased. Over the range of speeds up to the preferred speeds, the sensitivity of DLPN neurons to discrete stimulus-related, retinal-image speed averaged 3.0 spikes/s per deg/s. The responses to large-field visual motion were less sensitive to retinal image speed and exhibited an average sensitivity of 1.4 spikes/s per deg/s before the visual response saturated. 5. DLPN and MT were quantitatively comparable with respect to degree of direction selectivity, retinal image speed tuning, and distribution of preferred speeds. Many DLPN receptive fields contained the fovea and were larger than those of MT and more like MST receptive fields in size.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

1. Anatomical and single-unit recording studies suggest that the dorsolateral pontine nucleus (DLPN) in monkey is a major link in the projection of descending visual motion information to the cerebellum. Such studies coupled with cortical and cerebellar lesion results suggest a major role for this basilar pontine region in the mediation of smooth-pursuit eye movements. 2. To provide more direct evidence that this pontine region is involved in the control of smooth-pursuit eye movements, focal chemical lesions were made in DLPN in the vicinity of previously recorded visual motion and pursuit-related neurons. Eye movement responses were subsequently recorded in these lesioned animals under several behavioral paradigms. 3. A major deficit in smooth-pursuit performance was produced after unilateral DLPN lesions generated either reversibly with lidocaine or more permanently with ibotenic acid. Pursuit impairments were observed during steady-state tracking of sinusoidal target motion as well as during the initiation of pursuit tracking to sudden ramp target motion. Through the use of the latter technique, initial eye acceleration was reduced to less than one-half of normal for animals with large lesions of the dorsolateral and lateral pontine nuclei. 4. The pursuit deficit in all animals was directional in nature and was not dependent on the visual hemifield in which the motion stimulus occurred. The largest effect for horizontal tracking occurred in all animals for pursuit directed ipsilateral to the lesion. Animals also showed major deficits in one or both directions of vertical pursuit, although the primary direction of the vertical impairment was variable from animal to animal. 5. Chemical lesions in the DLPN also produced comparable deficits in the initiation of optokinetic-induced smooth eye movements in the ipsilateral direction. In contrast to this effect on the initial optokinetic response, in the one lesioned animal studied during prolonged constant velocity optokinetic drum rotation, smooth eye speed increased slowly over a 10- to 15-s period to reach a level that closely matched drum speed. These results suggest that pathways outside the DLPN can generate the steady-state optokinetic response. 6. Saccades to stationary targets were normal after DLPN lesions, but corrective saccades made to targets moving in the direction ipsilateral to the lesion were much more hypometric than similar prelesion control saccades. 7. The pursuit deficits produced by lidocaine injections recovered within 30 min. The ibotenic acid deficits were maximal approximately 1 day after the injection and recovered rapidly thereafter over a time period of 3-7 days.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

A small region in the dorsal midline portion of the nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis (NRTP) in monkeys contains neurons that respond to focal visual stimuli or during saccadic eye movements or both. None of these cells or any others in this region respond to the motion of large visual fields (optokinetic stimulation), although such responses were specifically sought. Thus, this group of NRTP neurons forms a completely different set of cells than those previously described in more rostral but closely adjacent portions of the pontine nuclei which respond well to optokinetic stimulation. The most frequently encountered cell type in this region of NRTP (153 neurons) produced a high-frequency burst of discharges during saccadic eye movements. Neural discharge (burst intensity or duration) was not related to saccade metrics. Instead, peak burst frequency and/or the number of spikes in a unit's burst reached a maximum when the saccade moved the eyes to a circumscribed region (movement field) of the animal's visual field. There were two subtypes of these burst neurons. In one type (44%) the movement fields were smaller and entirely contained within the oculomotor range. In the other type (56%) the movement fields consisted of a whole sector (some as wide as 180 degrees) of the entire oculomotor range. All the neurons in this sample that we were able to test in total darkness continued to produce bursts of discharges of similar profile during spontaneous saccades into their movement field. All the movement fields were retinotopically organized, although a few cells (22%) showed a marked variation of burst metrics with initial eye position. Another small group of cells in NRTP (8 neurons) responded to small spots of light turned on within a circumscribed region of the visual field while the animal maintained fixation on a separate spot of light. These visual neurons produced no saccade-related discharge. A larger group of neurons (24 out of 52 tested cells) produced both a visual response and a saccadic burst. The visual field of this type of cell was always smaller and was contained within the movement field of the cell. The response of both types of NRTP visual neurons was enhanced when the visual stimulus was to be the target for a saccadic eye movement. On double-saccade trials the visual stimulus was never present in the hemifield containing the cell's visual field.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

1. The observation of smooth-pursuit eye and retinal image velocity signals in lobules VI and VII of the vermis has given rise to the hypothesis that a neural correlate of a target velocity signal exists in this region of the cerebellum (29). However, activity signaling head velocity is also required to regenerate a target velocity signal. Vermal Purkinje cell activity was, therefore, recorded during the performance of paradigms designed to dissociate head movement-related responses. 2. The activity of 107 Purkinje cells was found to be related to horizontal head velocity. Of these, 52% increased their discharge rate for ipsilaterally directed passive head movement (type I), and 48% were excited by contralateral head movements (type II). 3. In five Purkinje cells in which sufficient data were obtained, cell discharge rate increased monotonically with head velocity over the range of 5-40 deg/s. The sensitivity to head velocity at 0.4 Hz +/- 25 deg/s averaged approximately 0.5 spikes.s-1/deg.s-1 in a larger sample of cells (n = 39). The sensitivities to head velocity, at this same frequency and velocity, of type I and type II Purkinje cells were comparable at 0.44 and 0.51 spikes.s-1/deg.s-1, respectively. 4. The Purkinje cell responses led head velocity by an average of 12 degrees at 0.4 Hz +/- 25 deg/s of passive head rotation. The phase shifts associated with type I and II responses were similar with phase leads of 13 and 9 degrees with respect to head velocity, respectively. 5. A linear interaction of smooth-pursuit eye and head velocity signals was observed during the performance of a variety of antiphase and inphase eye and head movement paradigms. The results support the conclusion that some Purkinje cells in lobules VI and VII of the cerebellar vermis encode a gaze velocity signal. Contributions of the head velocity signal to the regeneration of target velocity are considered in a companion paper (32).

1. Purkinje cell activity was recorded from lobules VI and VII of the cerebellar vermis during the performance of visuooculomotor tasks designed to dissociate the signals related to head, smooth-pursuit eye, and retinal image movements. Task-related modulations in the simple spike discharge rates of 157 cells were observed in three alert monkeys. 2. Of 65 Purkinje cells that were completely tested for all three signals, all exhibited smooth-pursuit eye movement-related activity. An additional vestibular or visual response was observed in 17 and 11% of the cells, respectively. Eye, head, and retinal image velocity signals were all recorded in the same unit in 52% of the Purkinje cells. The responses of 5% of the fully tested cells were associated with changes in the direction of eye, head, and retinal image movement. 3. The observed sensorioculomotor responses were direction selective in 98% of the Purkinje cells. For the Purkinje cells that were fully tested, 60% of the cells exhibited peak discharge rates for ipsilateral and 40% for contralateral eye velocity. Of these Purkinje cells, 45% exhibited eye, head, and retinal image velocity signals with equivalent direction preferences. 4. Of 42 Purkinje cells tested, 88% demonstrated some kinds of interactive responses during combined eye and sensory stimulation. The interaction of eye and head velocity signals has been discussed in a companion paper (38). The modulation in discharge rate observed during tracking in the presence of a random dot background pattern could be predicted from the dissociated responses to smooth pursuit in the dark and to movements of the background pattern during suppression of eye movements. 5. The sensitivity to smooth-pursuit eye velocity averaged 1.4 times the sensitivity to head velocity. In 80% of the Purkinje cells, however, the sensitivity to eye velocity exceeded the sensitivity to head velocity by an average of only 10%. The sensitivity to smooth-pursuit eye velocity averaged 1.6 times the sensitivity to retinal image velocity. 6. An increase in Purkinje cell discharge rate was observed during the open-loop period of the initiation of smooth-pursuit eye movements. This open-loop response was consistent with the presence of a visual signal during ocular pursuit, since these cells were also shown to be responsive to a dissociated retinal image velocity signal. Furthermore, the magnitude of the open-loop response indicated an enhancement of the sensitivity to retinal image velocity when visual information became behaviorally significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)