Search

on and off auditory responses were examined in the medial geniculate body (MGB) of the guinea pig. Single- and multiunit recordings were carried out on 12 anesthetized animals, and noise-burst or pure-tone stimuli were applied to the ear contralateral to the recording hemisphere. One hundred and thirty-fiveoff or on-off neurons and 160 onneurons were studied, and the tuning curves of 21 on-off oroff neurons were examined from various nuclei of the MGB. The mean minimum threshold of the off responses (40.8 ± 20.0 dB SPL, mean ± SD; range: 0–80 dB SPL) was significantly higher than that of the on responses (28.5 ± 17.6 dB SPL, range: 0–60 dB SPL; n = 17, P < 0.001). Of 10 on-off neurons that showed identifiable tuning frequencies for both on andoff responses, 7 showed a higher off thanon best frequency (BF), 2 showed the same BF for bothon and off, and only 1 showed a slightly loweroff than on BF. Most off responses sampled from the borders of the ventral (MGv) and the rostromedial (MGrm) nuclei of the MGB showed single-peaked tuning curves, similar to those of the on responses in the MGv. The neurons located in the shell (MGs) and dorsal (MGd) nuclei of the MGB showed complicated—either multi-peaked or broad—tuning curves. Alloff responses showed long-duration-selectivity for acoustic stimuli: the mean half-maximum duration was 116.5 ± 114.8 ms ( n = 19, range: 27–411 ms). The latencies of 135off responses were studied in various divisions of the MGB. The ventral border region of MGv showed the shortest latency, followed by the dorsal border region of the MGv, the MGrm, and the caudomedial nucleus (MGcm) of the MGB. The posterior nucleus of the thalamus (Po), the MGd, and the MGs showed much longer mean latencies of >30 ms ( P < 0.05 compared with the border regions of the MGv, ANOVA), with Po showing the greatest mean latency of 60.3 ms and the greatest deviation of 25.5 ms). The latency of the offresponse (29.0 ± 14.0 ms, n = 135) was significantly greater than that of the on response (15.6 ± 9.6 ms, n = 160, P < 0.001). The present results provide valuable information about the threshold, frequency tuning characteristics, minimal response latency, and duration selectivity of off neurons in the auditory thalamus.

Responses to repeated auditory stimuli were examined in 103 neurons in the auditory region of the thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN) and in 20 medial geniculate (MGB) neurons of anesthetized rats. A further six TRN neurons were recorded from awake rats. The TRN neurons showed strong responses to the first trial and weak responses to the subsequent trials of repeated auditory stimuli and electrical stimulation of the MGB and auditory cortex when the interstimulus interval (ISI) was short (

Electrical stimulation of the auditory cortex (AC) causes both facilitatory and inhibitory effects on the medial geniculate body (MGB). The purpose of this study was to identify the corticofugal inhibitory pathway to the MGB. We assessed two potential circuits: 1) the cortico-colliculo-thalamic circuit and 2) cortico-reticulo-thalamic one. We compared intracellular responses of MGB neurons to electrical stimulation of the AC following bilateral ablation of the inferior colliculi (IC) or thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN) in anesthetized guinea pigs. Cortical stimulation with intact TRN could cause strong inhibitory effects on the MGB neurons. The corticofugal inhibition remained effective after bilateral IC ablation, but it was minimized after the TRN was lesioned with kainic acid. Synchronized TRN neuronal activity and MGB inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) were observed with multiple recordings. The results suggest that corticofugal inhibition traverses the corticoreticulothalamic pathway, indicating that the colliculi-geniculate inhibitory pathway is probably only for feedforward inhibition.

Corticofugal modulation on both on andoff responses in various nuclei in the medial geniculate body (MGB) was examined by locally activating the auditory cortex and looking for effects on the neuronal responses to acoustic stimuli. In contrast with a major corticofugal facilitatory effect on theon neurons in the lemniscal nucleus of the MGB of the guinea pigs, of 132 on neurons tested in three conditions with cortical activation through each of three implanted electrodes, the majority of the tested conditions (319/396) that were sampled from the nonlemniscal nuclei of the MGB received inhibitory modulation from the activated cortex. This inhibitory effect was >50% for 99 cases while the auditory cortex was activated. Most of the offand on-off MGB neurons (44/54) showed a facilitatory effect of 111.4 ± 99.9%, and three showed a small inhibitory effect of 25.7 ± 5.8% on their off responses. Thirty neurons in the border region between the lemniscal and nonlemniscal MGB showed mainly facilitatory corticofugal effects on both on andoff responses. Meanwhile, cortical stimulation induced almost exclusive inhibitory effects on the on response and facilitatory effects on the off response in the MGcm. It is suggested that the off response is produced as a disinhibition from the inhibitory input of the auditory stimulus. The present results provide a possible explanation for selective gating of the auditory information through the lemniscal MGB while switching off other unwanted sensory signals and the interference from the limbic system, leaving the other auditory cortex prepared to process only the auditory signal.

He, Jufang. Modulatory effects of regional cortical activation on the onset responses of the cat medial geniculate neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 896–908, 1997. Corticofugal modulation on activity of the medial geniculate body (MGB) was examined by locally activating the primary auditory cortex (AI) and looking for effects on the onset responses of MGB neurons to acoustic stimuli. Of 103 MGB neurons recorded from 13 hemispheres of 11 animals, 91 neurons (88%) showed either a facilitatory or inhibitory effect or both; of these neurons, 72 showed facilitatory effects and 25 inhibitory effects. The average facilitatory effect was large, with a mean increase of 62.4%. Small inhibitory effects (mean: −16.2%) were obtained from a few neurons (6 of 103) when a pure tone stimulus was used, whereas the effect became larger and more frequent when a noise burst stimulus was used (mean: −27.3%, n = 22 of 27 neurons). Activation of an AI site having the same best frequency (BF) as the MGB neuron being recorded from produced mainly a facilitatory effect on MGB neuronal responses to pure tones. Activation of AI at a site neighboring the BF site produced inhibitory effects on the MGB response when noise burst stimuli were used. We found that the effective stimulation sites in AI that could modulate MGB activity formed patchlike maps with a diameter of 1.13 ± 0.09 (SE) mm (range 0.6–1.9 mm, n = 15) being larger than the patches of thalamocortical terminal fields. Examining the effects of sound intensities, of 18 neurons tested 9 neurons showed a larger effect for low-sound-intensity stimuli and small or no effects for high-sound-intensity stimuli. These were named low-sound-intensity effective neurons. Five neurons showed high sound intensity effectiveness and four were non-intensity specific. Most low-sound-intensity effective neurons were monotonic rate-intensity function neurons. The AI cortical modulatory effect was frequency specific, because 15 of 27 neurons showed a larger facilitatory effect when a BF stimulus was used rather than a stimulus of any other frequency. The corticothalamic connection between the recording site in MGB and the most effective stimulation site in AI was confirmed by injecting wheat germ agglutinin–horseradish peroxidase tracer at the stimulation site and producing a small lesion in the recording site. The results suggest that 1) the large facilitation effects obtained by AI activation at the region that directly projected to the MGB could be the result mainly of the direct projection terminals to the MGB relay neurons; 2) the large size patches of the effective stimulation site in AI could be due to widely ramifying corticothalamic projections; and 3) the corticofugal projection selectively gates auditory information mainly by a facilitatory effect, although there is also an inhibitory effect that depends on the sound stimulus used.