Search

Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique. cTBS modulation is an effective treatment for motor dysfunction rehabilitation in post-stroke patients. However, there's currently a lack of research on the effects of cTBS stimulation on the contralesional hemisphere. To better understand the role of cTBS in motor rehabilitation, we investigated the neuroregulatory mechanisms of cTBS in the contralateral cortex using transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked electroencephalography (TMS-EEG). In this randomized, sham-controlled, single-blind study, 18 healthy subjects received two separate stimulation conditions: cTBS or sham stimulation applied to the left primary motor cortex (M1). TMS-EEG measurements were taken before and immediately after stimulation. We investigated the TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs), evoked oscillatory responses (EOR), and phase synchronization index (PSI) of TMS-EEG. The effects of cTBS were analyzed using two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (RMANOVA). There was a significant "cTBS condition × time" interaction effect on the theta and gamma bands of EOR, and on interhemisphere PSI (inter-PSI) and global PSI in both cTBS stimulation conditions. (theta: F = 4.526, P = 0.041; gamma: F = 5.574, P = 0.024; inter-PSI: F = 5.028, P = 0.032; global PSI: F = 5.129, P = 0.030). After real cTBS modulation, the energy in the theta and gamma frequency bands was significantly higher than before (theta: F = 5.747, P = 0.022; gamma: F = 5.545, P = 0.024). The inter-PSI and global PSI significantly increased after real cTBS modulation (inter-PSI: F = 6.209, P = 0.018; global PSI: F = 6.530, P = 0.015). cTBS modulation significantly increased EOR and PSI in contralateral brain regions, thereby enhancing cortical excitability and cortical functional connectivity throughout the brain. This provides a theoretical basis for cTBS neuromodulation in patients with stroke. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: In right-handed individuals, the left hemisphere exhibits higher excitability. According to hemispheric competition theory, applying continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) to inhibit excitability in the left hemisphere can reduce its inhibitory effect on the right, thereby promoting neural excitability. This study applied cTBS to the left M1 of healthy individuals and, for the first time, recorded transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) from the right M1 to analyze the effects of cTBS on cortical oscillations and network connectivity in the contralateral cortex. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the human motor cortex induces changes in excitability within cortical and spinal circuits that occur during and after the stimulation. Recently, transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) has been shown to modulate spinal conduction properties, as assessed by somatosensory-evoked potentials, and transynaptic properties of the spinal neurons, as tested by postactivation depression of the H reflex or by the RIII nociceptive component of the flexion reflex in the lower limb. To further explore tsDCS-induced plastic changes in spinal excitability, we examined, in a double-blind crossover randomized study, the stimulus-response curves of the soleus H reflex before, during, at current offset and 15 min after anodal, cathodal, and sham tsDCS delivered at the Th11 level (2.5 mA, 15 min, 0.071 mA/cm², 0.064 C/cm²) in 17 healthy subjects. Anodal tsDCS induced a progressive leftward shift of the recruitment curve of the soleus H reflex during the stimulation; the effects persisted for at least 15 min after current offset. In contrast, both cathodal and sham tsDCS had no significant effects. This exploratory study provides further evidence for the use of tsDCS as an expedient, noninvasive tool to induce long-lasting plastic changes in spinal circuitry. Increased spinal excitability after anodal tsDCS may have potential for spinal neuromodulation in patients with central nervous system lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The everyday experience of stepping onto a stationary escalator causes a stumble, despite our full awareness that the escalator is broken. In the laboratory, this "broken escalator" phenomenon is reproduced when subjects step onto an obviously stationary platform (AFTER trials) that was previously experienced as moving (MOVING trials) and attests to a process of motor adaptation. Given the critical role of M1 in upper limb motor adaptation and the potential for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to increase cortical excitability, we hypothesized that anodal tDCS over leg M1 and premotor cortices would increase the size and duration of the locomotor aftereffect. Thirty healthy volunteers received either sham or real tDCS (anodal bihemispheric tDCS; 2 mA for 15 min at rest) to induce excitatory effects over the primary motor and premotor cortex before walking onto the moving platform. The real tDCS group, compared with sham, displayed larger trunk sway and increased gait velocity in the first AFTER trial and a persistence of the trunk sway aftereffect into the second AFTER trial. We also used transcranial magnetic stimulation to probe changes in cortical leg excitability using different electrode montages and eyeblink conditioning, before and after tDCS, as well as simulating the current flow of tDCS on the human brain using a computational model of these different tDCS montages. Our data show that anodal tDCS induces excitability changes in lower limb motor cortex with resultant enhancement of locomotor adaptation aftereffects. These findings might encourage the use of tDCS over leg motor and premotor regions to improve locomotor control in patients with neurological gait disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Convergent findings point to a left-sided specialization for the representation of learned actions in right-handed humans, but it is unknown whether analogous hemispheric specialization exists for motor skill learning. In the present study, we explored this question by comparing the effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over either left or right motor cortex (M1) on motor skill learning in either hand, using a tDCS montage to better isolate stimulation to one hemisphere. Results were compared with those previously found with a montage more commonly used in the field. Six groups trained for three sessions on a visually guided sequential pinch force modulation task with their right or left hand and received right M1, left M1, or sham tDCS. A linear mixed-model analysis for motor skill showed a significant main effect for stimulation group (left M1, right M1, sham) but not for hand (right, left) or their interaction. Left M1 tDCS induced significantly greater skill learning than sham when hand data were combined, a result consistent not only with the hypothesized left hemisphere specialization for motor skill learning but also with possible increased left M1 responsiveness to tDCS. The unihemispheric montage effect size was one-half that of the more common montage, and subsequent power analysis indicated that 75 subjects per group would be needed to detect differences seen with only 12 subjects with the customary bihemispheric montage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The primary motor cortex (M1) area recruitment enlarges while learning a finger tapping sequence. Also M1 excitability increases during procedural consolidation. Our aim was to investigate whether increasing M1 excitability by anodal transcranial DC stimulation (AtDCS) when procedural consolidation occurs was able to induce an early consolidation improvement. Forty-seven right-handed healthy participants were trained in a nine-element serial finger tapping task (SFTT) executed with the left hand. Random series blocks were interspersed with training series blocks. Anodal or sham tDCS was administered over the right M1 after the end of the training session. After stimulation, the motor skills of both trained and a new untrained sequential series blocks were tested again. For each block, performance was estimated as the median execution time of correct series. Early consolidation of the trained series, assessed by the performance difference between the first block after and the last block before stimulation normalized by the random, was enhanced by anodal and not by sham tDCS. Stimulation did not affect random series execution. No stimulation effect was found on the on-line learning of the trained and new untrained series. Our results suggest that AtDCS applied on M1 soon after training improves early consolidation of procedural learning. Our data highlight the importance of neuromodulation procedures for understanding learning processes and support their use in the motor rehabilitation setting, focusing on the timing of the application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]