Search

Background: Natalizumab was not shown to modify disability in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). This matched observational study compared the effectiveness of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) with natalizumab in progressive MS., Methods: Patients with primary/secondary progressive MS from seven AHSCT MS centres and the MSBase registry, treated with AHSCT or natalizumab, were matched on a propensity score derived from sex, age, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), number of relapses 12/24 months before baseline, time from MS onset, the most effective prior therapy and country. The pairwise-censored groups were compared on hazards of 6-month confirmed EDSS worsening and improvement, relapses and annualised relapse rates (ARRs), using Andersen-Gill proportional hazards models and conditional negative binomial model., Results: 39 patients treated with AHSCT (37 with secondary progressive MS, mean age 37 years, EDSS 5.7, 28% with recent disability progression, ARR 0.54 during the preceding year) were matched with 65 patients treated with natalizumab. The study found no evidence for difference in hazards of confirmed EDSS worsening (HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.70 to 3.14) and improvement (HR 1.50, 95% CI 0.22 to 10.29) between AHSCT and natalizumab over up to 4 years. The relapse activity was also similar while treated with AHSCT and natalizumab (ARR: mean±SD 0.08±0.28 vs 0.08±0.25; HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.39 to 2.82). In the AHSCT group, 3 patients experienced febrile neutropenia during mobilisation, 9 patients experienced serum sickness, 6 patients required intensive care unit admission and 36 patients experienced complications after discharge. No treatment-related deaths were reported., Conclusion: This study does not support the use of AHSCT to control disability in progressive MS with advanced disability and low relapse activity., Competing Interests: Competing interests: TK served on scientific advisory boards for MS International Federation and WHO, BMS, Roche, Janssen, Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis, Merck and Biogen; steering committee for Brain Atrophy Initiative by Sanofi Genzyme; received conference travel support and/or speaker honoraria from WebMD Global, Eisai, Novartis, Biogen, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, BioCSL and Merck; and received research or educational event support from Biogen, Novartis, Genzyme, Roche, Celgene and Merck. SS has nothing to disclose. IR served on scientific advisory boards/steering committees for Novartis and Merck; and received conference travel support and/or speaker honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Biogen, Teva, Sanofi-Genzyme and Merck. JM served on scientific advisory board for Roche; and received conference travel support and/or speaker honoraria from Novartis, Biogen, Roche and Merck. IS received compensation for an educational activity from Biogen. BW has nothing to disclose. MSF has nothing to disclose. HA has nothing to disclose. EKH received honoraria/research support from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche and Teva; and has been supported by the Czech Ministry of Education–project Cooperatio LF1, research area Neuroscience and the project National Institute for Neurological Research (Programme EXCELES, ID project no LX22NPO5107)–funded by the European Union-Next Generation EU. EK has nothing to disclose. MT received honoraria from Janssen, Gilead Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, Amgen, AbbVie, Roche, MorphoSys and Novartis; served as an advisor to Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, AbbVie, Amgen, Roche, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, MorphoSys and Novartis; and received conference travel support from Gilead Sciences, Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Janssen and AbbVie. TK has nothing to disclose. JB has nothing to disclose. RM received compensation for travelling, conference fees and consulting fees from Merck, Teva, Sanofi Genzyme, Biogen Idec, Novartis, Roche, BMS and Celgene. OT received speaker honoraria from and served on scientific advisory boards for Biogen, Sanofi-Aventis, Teva, Merck and Novartis. LB received speaker honoraria from Novartis, and consultant fees from Viatris. AKL did not declare any disclosures. BS has nothing to disclose. JS declares honoraria for educational events from Jazz, Gilead and Janssen; for advisory board membership from Medac and Vertex; and for trial IDMC membership from Kiadis Pharma., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is a highly effective treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS). The impact of previous long-lasting disease-modifying treatments (DMT) for safety and efficacy of AHSCT is unknown., Objective: To explore whether previous DMTs with long-lasting effects on the immune system (anti-CD20 therapy, alemtuzumab and cladribine) affect treatment-related complications, long-term outcome and risk of new MS disease activity in patients treated with AHSCT., Methods: Retrospective observational study of 104 relapsing remitting patients with MS treated by AHSCT in Sweden and Norway from 2011 to 2021, grouped according to the last DMT used ≤6 months prior to AHSCT. The primary outcomes were early AHSCT-related complications (mortality, neutropenic fever and hospitalisation length), long-term complications (secondary autoimmunity) and proportion of patients with No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-3 status): no new relapses, no MRI activity and no disease progression during the follow-up., Results: The mean follow-up time was 39.5 months (range 1-95). Neutropenic fever was a common AHSCT-related complication affecting 69 (66%) patients. There was no treatment-related mortality. During the follow-up period, 20 patients (19%) were diagnosed with autoimmunity. Occurrence of neutropenic fever, hospitalisation length or secondary autoimmunity did not vary dependent on the last DMT used prior to AHSCT. A total of 84 patients (81%) achieved NEDA-3 status, including all patients (100%) using rituximab, alemtuzumab or cladribine before AHSCT., Conclusion: This study provides level 4 evidence that AHSCT in patients previously treated with alemtuzumab, cladribine or rituximab is safe and efficacious., Competing Interests: Competing interests: SASK has received unrestricted grants from Novartis and Biogen Idec. LB has received speaker honoraria from Novartis. ØT has received speaker honoraria from and served on scientific advisory boards for Biogen, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck and Novartis., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)