Search

Objective: We characterised the clinical and neuro-otological characteristics of patients with Susac syndrome., Methods: The medical records of 30 patients with Susac syndrome were reviewed for details of their clinical presentation and course, neuro-otological symptoms, investigation results including audiology and vestibular function tests, treatment and outcomes., Results: Our findings demonstrate that 29 of our 30 patients with Susac syndrome developed neuro-otological symptoms such as hearing loss, disequilibrium, tinnitus or vertigo during their disease course. Hearing loss was the most common neuro-otological symptom occurring in 93% of patients. A rising configuration of low-frequency greater than the high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss was the most characteristic finding on audiological testing (37% of reviewed audiograms). Disproportionately poor speech discrimination was identified in 20% of cases, and one case demonstrated a retrocochlear pattern on electrophysiological testing. Four patients required hearing aids and a further two patients required a cochlear implant due to severe hearing loss. Two out of two treated patients had improvements in hearing after the prompt administration of corticosteroids, indicating the potential for recoverable hearing loss if relapses are treated early. Effects on vestibular function were variable in ten patients who were tested, with most showing preservation of function despite significant hearing loss., Conclusions: Neuro-otological symptoms in Susac syndrome are almost universal. In the correct clinical context, a rising configuration of low to high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss should prompt consideration of Susac syndrome. Treatment of inner ear symptoms in Susac syndrome requires further research as early immunotherapy may be beneficial.

The medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF) is the final common pathway for all conjugate adducting horizontal eye movements, as well as for the vertical-torsional vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). MLF lesion causes adduction paresis of ipsilesional (adducting) eye with dissociated nystagmus of contralesional (abducting) eye-the well-known clinical syndrome of internuclear ophthalmoplegia (INO). We measured the VOR stimulation and also any catch-up saccades, from individual semicircular canal (SCC) evoked by the head impulse test (HIT), using head and binocular 3-dimensional scleral search coils in 27 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, 8 with unilateral, 19 with bilateral INO. In unilateral INO, VOR gain (normal >0.90) from ipsilesional lateral SCC stimulation was 0.48 for the adducting eye and 0.81 for the abducting eye; 0.61 from contralesional anterior SCC stimulation and only 0.29 from contralesional posterior SCC stimulation. In bilateral INO, there were VOR gain deficits from all six SCCs: lateral SCC gains were asymmetrically reduced to 0.45 in the adducting eye and 0.66 in the abducting eye; anterior SCC gain was 0.48 and posterior SCC gain was only 0.19. Horizontal VOR versional dysconjugacy between adducting and abducting eyes at 0.66 was less severe than horizontal catch-up saccade versional dysconjugacy (0.44); normal >0.80. Unexpected partial preservation of horizontal VOR with greater catch-up saccade impairment from the adducting than abducting eye suggests that the ascending tract of Deiters (ATD), an extra-MLF pathway, also mediates the horizontal VOR, but not adducting horizontal saccades. Vertical VOR deficits will produce vertical oscillopsia with any vertical head movement and measurement of the vertical VOR could help with the diagnosis and quantitative evaluation of MLF lesions in suspected MS. Horizontal VOR deficits and catch-up saccade versional dysconjugacy in INO will cause gaze instability and horizontal oscillopsia during active horizontal head movements.