Search

Background: Aneurysmal ruptures typically cause subarachnoid bleeding with intraparenchymal and intraventricular extension. However, rare instances of acute aneurysmal ruptures present with concomitant, non-traumatic subdural hemorrhage (SDH). We explored the incidence and difference in outcomes of SDH with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) as compared with aSAH alone., Methods: Retrospective cohort study from 2012 to 2015 from the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) (20% stratified sample of all hospitals in the United States). NIS database (2012 to September 2015) queried to identify all patients presenting with aSAH. From this population, the patients with concomitant SDH were identified., Results: A total of 10 075 patients with both cerebral aneurysms and aSAH were included. Of these, 335 cases of concomitant SDH and aSAH were identified. There was no significant change in the rate of SDH in aSAH over time. SDH with aSAH patients had a mortality of 24% compared with 12% (p=0.003) in the SAH only group, and only 16% were discharged home vs 37% (p=0.003) in the SAH group., Conclusions: There is a 3.5% incidence of acute SDH in patients presenting with non-traumatic aSAH. Patients with SDH and aSAH have nearly double the mortality, higher rate of discharge to nursing home and rehabilitation, and a significantly lower rate of discharge to home and return to routine functioning. This information is useful in counseling and prognostication of patients with concomitant SDH and aSAH., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: Atraumatic convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage is a subtype of spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage that often presents a diagnostic challenge. Common etiologies include cerebral amyloid angiopathy, vasculopathies, and coagulopathy; however, aneurysm is rare. Given the broad differential of causes of convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage, we assessed the diagnostic yield of common tests and propose a testing strategy., Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective study on consecutive patients with atraumatic convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage over a 2-year period. We obtained and reviewed each patient's imaging and characterized the frequency with which each test ultimately diagnosed the cause. Additionally, we discuss clinical features of patients with convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage with respect to the mechanism of hemorrhage., Results: We identified 70 patients over the study period (mean (SD) age 64.70 (16.9) years, 35.7% men), of whom 58 patients (82%) had a brain MRI, 57 (81%) had non-invasive vessel imaging, and 27 (38.5%) underwent catheter-based angiography. Diagnoses were made using only non-invasive imaging modalities in 40 patients (57%), while catheter-based angiography confirmed the diagnosis in nine patients (13%). Further clinical history and laboratory testing yielded a diagnosis in an additional 17 patients (24%), while the cause remained unknown in four patients (6%)., Conclusion: The etiology of convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage may be diagnosed in most cases via non-invasive imaging and a thorough clinical history. However, catheter angiography should be strongly considered when non-invasive imaging fails to reveal the diagnosis or to better characterize a vascular malformation. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate this algorithm., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)