Search

The human pituitary gland may be the size of a pea, but it punches well above its weight due to secretion of hormones that regulate essential homeostatic processes ranging from growth to stress. Recent advances in imaging and genetics have allowed large-scale interrogation of pituitary structure and function, and in doing so, have revealed that output relies on its organisation into highly plastic networks., (© 2013 British Society for Neuroendocrinology.)

Interleukin (IL)-6 deficient mice develop mature-onset obesity. Furthermore, i.c.v. administration of IL-6 increases energy expenditure, suggesting that IL-6 centrally regulates energy homeostasis. To investigate whether it would be possible for IL-6 to directly influence the energy homeostasis via hypothalamic regulation in humans and rodents, we mapped the distribution of the ligand binding IL-6 receptor α (IL-6Rα) in this brain region. In the human hypothalamus, IL-6Rα-immunoreactivity was detected in perikarya and first-order dendrites of neurones. The IL-6Rα-immunoreactive (-IR) neurones were observed posterior to the level of the interventricular foramen. There, IL-6Rα-IR neurones were located in the lateral hypothalamic, perifornical, dorsal and posterior hypothalamic areas, the hypothalamic dorsomedial nucleus and in the zona incerta. In the caudal part of the hypothalamus, the density of the IL-6Rα-IR neurones gradually increased. Double-labelling immunofluorescent studies demonstrated that IL-6Rα immunoreactivity was localised in the same neurones as the orexigenic neuropeptide, melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH). By contrast, IL-6Rα-immunoreactivity was not observed in the orexin B-IR neurones. To determine whether the observed expression of IL-6Rα is evolutionary conserved, we studied the co-localisation of IL-6Rα with MCH and orexin in the mouse hypothalamus, where IL-6Rα-immunoreactivity was present in numerous MCH-IR and orexin-IR neurones. Our data demonstrate that the MCH neurones of the human hypothalamus, as well as the MCH and orexin neurones of the mouse hypothalamus, contain IL-6Rα. This opens up the possibility that IL-6 influences the energy balance through the MCH neurones in humans, and both MCH and orexin neurones in mice., (© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Neuroendocrinology © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis plays a key role in the neuroendocrine response to stress. Dynamic changes in HPA axis regulation and hence HPA responsivity occur over the lifetime of an animal. This article focuses on two extremes of the spectrum. The first occurs naturally during pregnancy when stress responses are dampened. The second, at the opposite end of the scale, occurs in offspring of mothers who were exposed to stress during pregnancy and display exaggerated HPA axis stress responses. Reduced glucocorticoid output in response to stress in pregnancy may have important consequences for conserving energy supply to the foetus(es), in modulating immune system adaptations and in protecting against adverse foetal programming by glucocorticoids. Understanding the mechanisms underpinning this adaptation in pregnancy may provide insights for manipulating HPA axis responsiveness in later life, particularly in the context of resetting HPA axis hyperactivity associated with prenatal stress exposure, which may underlie several major pathologies, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus type 2, obesity, cognitive decline and mood disorders., (© 2010 The Authors. Journal of Neuroendocrinology © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

In this review, we examine how far the increased understanding that we have of the events in excitation contraction can explain the effects of the oestrous cycle and sex hormones on uterine function. Observational studies of electrical and mechanical activity in the rat myometrium have shown a relative quiescence during pro-oestrous, with little propagation of any electrical events. Thus, uterine activity can be said to approximately inversely reflect plasma 17beta-oestradiol concentrations. We show that Ca(2+) signalling and mechanical activity are greatest in metoestrous and dioestrous compared to pro-oestrous and oestrous. These data are discussed in terms of hormonal effects on Ca(2+) and K(+) channels. Finally, the influence of sex hormones on lipid rafts and caveolae are considered and discussed in relation to recent findings on their role in uterine signalling and contractility, and cholesterol levels and obesity.

We still do not understand the pathogenesis of the majority of pituitary adenomas or why, once formed, their behaviour tends to be so benign. Understanding trophic activity in the normal pituitary may be the key. Despite the fact that changes in indices of cell division and programmed cell death that are too small to measure can produce highly significant fluxes in cell populations, little by little, the fascinating patterns of integrated responses of pituitary cells to hormonal stimuli are now being revealed.

The adipose hormone, leptin, not only restrains appetite, but also influences energy expenditure. One such influence is to promote sexual maturation and fertility. The neuromodulatory circuits that mediate this effect are not well known but the present study suggests that one mediator could be melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH). We show that the long-form receptor (Ob-Rb) is expressed in the zona incerta of the rat and that administration of leptin (both 0.5 microg and 1.0 microg/side) into this area of ovariectomized, oestrogen-primed rats stimulated the release of luteinizing hormone (LH) within 1 h, the effect enduring for a further 1 h. Injections of leptin into the arcuate nucleus induced a smaller, transient rise in LH while injections into the paraventricular and ventromedial nuclei were without effect. MCH neurones are present in the zona incerta and administration of this hormone into the medial preoptic area (mPOA) stimulates LH release, therefore we investigated the possibility that MCH might mediate this effect of leptin. An injection of MCH antiserum into mPOA prevented the rise in LH normally induced by leptin injected into the zona incerta. In addition, melanocortin receptor antagonists ([D-Arg8]ACTH(4-10) and [Ala6]ACTH(4-10)), previously shown to inhibit the stimulatory effect of MCH on LH release, also inhibited the effect of leptin. We propose that one route by which leptin may promote reproductive activity is by enhancing MCH release from fibres within the mPOA. Speculative mechanisms for the action of MCH include the following possibilities: MCH may be acting on the specific MCH receptor which in turn interacts with a melanocortin or melanocortin-like receptor; MCH may bind directly to one of the melanocortin receptors; or melanocortin antagonists may interact with the MCH receptor.

Melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) is a neuropeptide, identified by its ability to either mimic or antagonize the melanin-dispersing action of alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone (alphaMSH) on skin melanophores. MCH and alphaMSH also have antagonistic actions in the brain affecting feeding behaviour, aggression, anxiety, arousal and reproductive function through the release of luteinizing hormone (LH). It is not clear, however, how they exert their opposite effects in the central nervous system (CNS). One possibility is that they act via a common receptor. In this study we have examined the effect of a number of MC receptor antagonists, with relative selectivity for the MC3, 4 and 5 subtypes, on the actions of MCH on LH release. We confirmed that bilateral administration of MCH (100 and 200 ng/side) into the medial preoptic area of oestrogen-primed (oestradiol benzoate 5 microgram) ovariectomized anaesthetized rats, stimulated the release of LH. This effect was blocked by the concomitant administration into the medial preoptic area of the MC4/5 antagonist ([D-Arg8]ACTH(4-10) and the MC3/5 antagonist ([Ala6]ACTH(4-10)-both at 500 ng/side-but not by the MC3/4 antagonist, SHU9119 (200 ng/side). Furthermore, the MC3 agonist [Nle3]-gamma2 MSH failed to affect LH release. These results indicate that the MC3 and MC4 receptors are not involved in mediating the action of MCH but are consistent with an action via the MC5 subtype. Preputial glands, which express MC5 receptors, were also stimulated by MCH which is in keeping with this idea. In HEK293 cells transfected with the MC5 receptor MCH increased the production of IP3. However, it was much less potent than alphaMSH and unlike alphaMSH, had no effect on the production of cAMP. MCH (10-10 to 10-5 M) also failed to displace I125NDP-MSH from cells transfected with MC5 receptors indicating that it was not acting as a competitive antagonist and its binding site was distinct from that of alphaMSH. Thus while MCH may function as an agonist at the MC5 receptor, its stimulation of LH release is more likely to be mediated via a specific MCH receptor that has common properties with the MC5 receptor.